Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ROME3607 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ROME3607 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2003-08-08 15:01:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | EAID EAGR AORC PREF KUNR WFP UN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ROME 003607 SIPDIS AIDAC FROM U.S. MISSION IN ROME SENSITIVE STATE FOR A/S PRM DEWEY, IO A/S HOLMES, EUR/NE, EUR/WE, SA/INS, IO/EDA SKOTOK USDA/FAS FOR U/S PENN, MCHAMBLISS, RTILSWORTH AND LPANASUK USAID FOR ADMINISTRATOR NATSIOS, AA/DCHA WINTER, AA/ANE, D/DCHA/OFDA BMCCONNELL, D/DCHA/FFP LANDIS BRUSSELS FOR USAID/PLERNER USUN FOR MLUTZ GENEVA FOR RMA/LYNCH AND USAID/KYLOH NSC FOR JDWORKEN E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: EAID, EAGR, AORC, PREF, KUNR, WFP, UN SUBJECT: Policy dialogue session in Dhaka on WFP post- delivery losses in Bangladesh REF: (A) 02 ROME 02673 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED - PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. NOT SUITABLE FOR INTERNET POSTING. ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. (U) The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) led a July 24 policy dialogue session in Dhaka to review key findings and preliminary recommendations of its WFP commissioned Food Aid Leakages study. Sub-studies on losses linked to discharge in ports, transit losses through the national Public Food Distribution System (PFDS) to the district level, and from Local Supply Depots (LSD) to the beneficiary - were presented. While loss rates were acknowledged to be unacceptably high, GOB affirmed its decision to vigorously pursue the study's recommendations through adoption of a plan of action. End summary. ---------- Background ---------- 2. (U) In May 2001, the WFP Rome Secretariat informed the Executive Board of the commencement of a sustained effort in Bangladesh with bilateral and multilateral food aid donors (U.S., Canada, others) to address the problem of suspected food leakage to non-targeted beneficiaries or elsewhere through GOB-controlled distribution channels. WFP's initial misgivings came from a 1997 request it made to IFPRI to carry out a preliminary study to investigate the magnitude of the problem of food aid leakages in WFP-sponsored activities and develop a monitoring methodology capable of controlling in-country losses. In 1998, a comprehensive food commodity tracking system appraisal was carried out. In 1999, the WFP country office established a food transport and storage-monitoring unit. Since then, efforts have been made to inform vulnerable group and emergency operation beneficiaries, as well as the public at large, of their rights and entitlements related to rations. In recent years WFP has also proceeded to open a number of sub-offices throughout Bangladesh. 3. (U) The latest (and most ambitious) IFPRI study began in October 2002 and fieldwork was concluded by March 2003. A first draft of the findings was issued. With the caveat that donors and the WFP leadership were convinced that this process could not be rushed in order to assure complete GOB ownership of the results, a final report dialogue session was held in Dhaka on July 24, chaired by Dr. Quazi Mesbahuddin Ahmed, Additional Secretary, Economic Relations Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and amply attended by numerous responsible counterpart Ministries. US Mission/Rome Humanitarian Attache Tim Lavelle and Program Analyst Phil Lamade attended this session. -------------- Major findings -------------- 4. (SBU) Port losses for WFP imports are adjudged by IFPRI to be 1.55 percent of listed Bill of Lading Quantities. Transit losses in the Public Distribution System (which moves the commodities from the port to the district level through the Ministry of Food) were calculated at 0.72 percent. Most worrying are losses from the local supply depots (LSD) of the Ministry of Food through the finalS PENN, MCHAMBLISS, RTILSWORTH AND LPANASUK USAID FOR ADMINISTRATOR NATSIOS, AA/DCHA WINTER, AA/ANE, D/DCHA/OFDA BMCCONNELL, D/DCHA/FFP LANDIS BRUSSELS FOR USAID/PLERNER USUN FOR MLUTZ GENEVA FOR RMA/LYNCH AND USAID/KYLOH NSC FOR JD delivery to beneficiaries, which are calculated at 8 percent for WFP's major effort in Bangladesh, the Vulnerable Group Development (VGD) scheme. Part of these local losses are attributed to the pressure to feed additional "ultra poor" or destitute who are not officially listed beneficiaries (i.e., dilution of rations); use of some of the food to pay expenses related to handling and local transport; and deliberate underweighing of rations at distribution sites by local authorities. Note: WFP's VGD activity covers 500,000 vulnerable women on an annual basis. Bangladesh's "ultra poor" are calculated at 30 million and the number of chronically undernourished around 45-50 million, so that there is constant "pressure" to feed more vulnerable people than are listed on official coverage rolls. End note. 5. (U) In practice, GOB has been absorbing the port and in- transit losses and crediting WFP with the Bill of Lading quantities at the LSD level. Even so, port and in- transit/storage losses up to the local level still constitute a loss to the national wealth and failure to seriously consider recurring shortfalls hardly provides any concerted incentive to ratchet down these losses to acceptable levels. 6. (U) At the end of the working session on July 24, it was agreed by IFPRI and the concerned parties that the finalized report and recommendations, in addition to a specific plan of action with timetables - would be made available by mid- September. 7. (SBU) On specific losses by category, the following: -Ports: operational losses due to normal handling and spillage is estimated to be 0.05 percent and the loss due to pilferage and other forms of misuse is estimated at 1.50 percent. Losses due to pilferage appear to be associated with the involvement of numerous agents and agencies in food aid imports which makes assigning of direct responsibility difficult (i.e., "too many cooks"); the absence of appropriate legal mechanisms to provide financial incentives to stevedores and other parties engaged in discharge; the presence of "tainted" unions in the principal ports; and collusion; -Public Food Distribution System (PFDS): As per IFPRI, in- transit and storage losses in the PFDS have substantially declined in the 1990s. Transit loss of food grains, which was as high as 3.5 percent of total distribution during the 1980s - declined to 0.30 percent between 1998 and 2002, while storage losses were reduced from 1.5 percent to 0.72 percent. Despite progress, IFPRI sees room for further improvements. In particular, an analysis of stock rotation suggests that 35 percent of the food grain distributed to beneficiaries is more than nine months old; -LSD to final beneficiary: District level Union Parishad (UP) chairpersons and members who distribute food grain to beneficiaries report lengthy delays or non-receipt of transport or handling commissions. Further, the approved rates are generally not sufficient to cover all the costs involved. Moreover, an absence of standardized and reliable weighing techniques makes monitoring of correct rations amounts difficult. IFPRI (through independent weighing of a random sample size of beneficiaries) determined that under delivery to the beneficiary averaged 7.53 percent and discrepancies in beneficiary lists accounted for a further 0.48 percent loss, bringing the total leakage level in the VGD program at the local level to 8.01 percent.S FOR U/S PENN, MCHAMBLISS, RTILSWORTH AND LPANASUK USAID FOR ADMINISTRATOR NATSIOS, AA/DCHA WINTER, AA/ANE, D/DCHA/OFDA BMCCONNELL, D/DCHA/FFP LANDIS BRUSSELS FOR USAID/PLERNER USUN FOR MLUTZ GENEVA FOR RMA/LYNCH AND USAID/KYLOH NS --------------------- Major Recommendations --------------------- 8. (SBU) The quantity recorded in a Bill of Lading should be considered the reference quantity for agreements between the GOB and donors on the amount of food grains delivered; -The number of independent surveyors/agents involved in food aid imports should be reduced and the process further streamlined. Preferably, all tallies should be performed by independent surveyors; -Preference should be given to the port of Chittagong which is more effectively managed than is Mongla port; -A comprehensive data base should be developed by WFP, Ministry of Food, shipping and lightering agents. This would produce a common information set, available to all parties without time lags; -GOB should expedite payment of incentives to stevedores and others engaged in the discharge process; -In the PFDS system, transporters should assume full responsibility for delivery of full invoiced quantities; -International food aid arrivals should be scheduled so that they do not coincide with the GOB's procurement season; -The GOB and the donors should formulate a single cost sharing arrangement to cover internal transport, shipping and handling (ITSH) costs; -Transportation and handling costs from the LSD to distribution center should be assessed for each Union and necessary allowances allocated in advance; -Weighing of rations at distribution sites should be performed using standard volume weighing measure; -As involuntary sharing of food rations violates program rules, steps should be taken to enforce a ban on this process; -The GOB and WFP should monitor program activity regularly to observe whether unauthorized activities exist, and take corrective measures, including strict disciplinary actions, whenever such activities are detected. 9. (SBU) Note. IFPRI also propounded: a) downsizing of the GOB's national security stock reserve from 800,000 metric tons (mts) to 600,000 mts, now that the private market plays a more important role in price stabilization; and b) PFDS auctioning off donations of red wheat (which commands a higher price on the local market), and delivering only white wheat varieties to WFP beneficiaries, which IFPRI maintains that the poor prefer. These are complex recommendations which will probably require further analysis. End note. ------- Comment ------- 10. (SBU) WFP has a USD 67 million/annum program in Bangladesh. To combat leakages, they have moved away in part from whole grain distribution through promotion of atta FOR A/S PRM DEWEY, IO A/S HOLMES, EUR/NE, EUR/WE, SA/INS, IO/EDA SKOTOK USDA/FAS FOR U/S PENN, MCHAMBLISS, RTILSWORTH AND LPANASUK USAID FOR ADMINISTRATOR NATSIOS, AA/DCHA WINTER, AA/ANE, D/DCHA/OFDA BMCCONNELL, D/DCHA/FFP LANDIS BRU (flour) fortification mills (which produce a readily identifiable product) in a number of rural areas, with support from USAID and CIDA; WFP has also launched a national primary school feeding project using enriched biscuits which contain the WFP-logo. Yet more needs to be done to ensure that beneficiaries do indeed obtain their agreed upon rations. While WFP is to be given due credit for identifying the problem, given the sizable amounts of commodity leakage involved, WFP, the GOB and the principal donors now need to fix what has been well documented (by the highly-respected IFPRI) to be broken. Every case of commodity hemorrhaging in today's constrained budgetary environment has to be swiftly and vigorously addressed. Bangladesh cannot be the exception to this rule. Hall NNNN 2003ROME03607 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04