Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ANKARA4593 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ANKARA4593 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2003-07-22 13:51:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR TU Press Summaries |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ANKARA 004593 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EUR/SE, EUR/PD, NEA/PD, DRL JCS PASS J-5/CDR S. WRIGHT E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, TU, Press Summaries SUBJECT: ANKARA MEDIA REACTION REPORT TUESDAY, JULY 22, 2003 THIS REPORT WILL PRESENT A TURKISH PRESS SUMMARY UNDER THREE THEMES: HEADLINES BRIEFING EDITORIAL OPINION --------------------------------------------- - HEADLINES MASS APPEAL Wolfowitz warns Iraq's neighbors not to intervene - Hurriyet Iraqi peacekeeping tough mission for Turkey - Turkiye AKP discusses new decree for troop deployment - Hurriyet Erdogan: U.S. wants Turkish troops for Iraq - Sabah Talabani objects to Turkish troops in N. Iraq - Aksam John Wolf to replace Bremer - Aksam Gul: Northern Iraqis our relatives - Milliyet Bush threatens Iran, Syria - Turkiye Turkey to train Afghan army - Aksam OPINION MAKERS Half of Americans doubt Bush's leadership skills - Yeni Safak Bush, Berlusconi meet in Texas - Cumhuriyet Islamists attack U.S. troops in Iraq - Cumhuriyet Amnesty International criticizes U.S. for mistreatment of Iraqis - Radikal Blair is cornered - Yeni Safak BRIEFING Turkish troops for Iraqi peacekeeping: Dailies report that the issue of Turkey's contribution to the Iraqi peacekeeping mission will be clarified during Foreign Minister Gul's visit to the U.S. 12,000 troops will be deployed in central parts of Iraq, including Baghdad and Tikrit, according to "Milliyet." Turkish forces in Northern Iraq will maintain their positions. The Turkish troops will stay in Iraq for at least three years. Ankara wanted to send troops to Northern Iraq, but the U.S. prefers for the Turks to be in the most troubled Iraqi cities. PUK leader Talabani said on Monday that the Turks have attempted to remove the federal administration and the Kurdish parliament in Northern Iraq, and he voiced strong objection to a Turkish military presence in the north. Ruling AKP deputies, disturbed by the Suleymaniye arrests, are reluctant to send soldiers to Iraq. Some AKP lawmakers told the press that the parliament would be unwilling to approve a motion to that end. "Hurriyet" thinks that because of the opposition by a large number of AKP deputies, the government is planning to use the March 20 motion endorsed by the parliament to send soldiers to Iraq. FM Gul to U.S.: Turkey's contribution to Iraqi peacekeeping, unofficially discussed in Ankara through military channels last week, will be the top issue during Foreign Minister Gul's calls in Washington this week. Gul and Secretary Powell are expected to announce political aspects of U.S.-Turkish cooperation after a meeting on July 24. Cyprus, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and the struggle against terrorism will be other issues of discussion during the Gul visit. "Sabah" expects Gul to offer a helping hand to U.S. efforts to ensure stability in Iraq in exchange for a continuation of Turkey's military presence in Northern Iraq. Ankara did not respond to $1 billion grant offer: U.S. Ambassador to Ankara W. Robert Pearson said on Monday that Ankara has not yet responded to the U.S offer of $1 billion in grants to compensate Turkey's losses for the Iraqi campaign. Pearson told "Hurriyet" that Washington had presented to Ankara a draft agreement about the aid last month. Gallup shows decline in support for U.S.: "Vatan" carries a Gallup survey conducted between April 16 and May 8 in 45 countries. 64 percent of Turks disapprove of the Iraq war. 75 percent regard the U.S. as an aggressor and a threat for the world. Only 13 percent of Turks see the U.S. as a friend. Syrian PM due in Ankara: Papers report that Syrian Prime Minister Mustafa Miro will be in Ankara next week, the first official visit between the two countries in 17 years. Miro will discuss with Turkish leaders issues including Iraq, the struggle against terrorism, economic cooperation, and border security. Miro's meetings might pave the way for a visit by the Syrian head of state, Bashar Assad, this fall. EDITORIAL OPINION: Iraq/WMD controversy "Turkish troops to Iraq" Fehmi Koru argued in the Islamist-intellectual (7/22): "Sending Turkish troops to Iraq has once again been brought onto the agenda; this is like the resurrection of a big mistake. The US is trying to share with others the responsibility of being an occupying force in Iraq. India and France have already said `no' to Washington, and there is no reason for Turkey to act differently. It seems that the US has realized the emerging impasse with respect to its position in Iraq, and there is no need to make it more complicated. The best thing is to arrange a calendar to schedule the departure of the occupation forces from Iraq, and hand over the responsibility to the UN. It is certain that the Iraqis would treat a UN peacekeeping force better than they do the Americans. At that stage, Turkey could join a UN peacekeeping force and also contribute to Iraq's political restructuring. Otherwise, dragging Turkey into the a military swamp is not going to serve US interests, either." "The death of Dr. Kelly" Turgut Tarhanli wrote in the liberal-intellectual Radikal (7/22): "If the David Kelly case turns out to be a suicide, an explanation from the Blair Government's is in the interest not only of the UK, but the whole world. . The Kelly event and the emerging facts about the distortion of intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction clearly indicate an aggressive foreign policy on the part of the US and the UK. The US remains in confusion over the intelligence reports about alleged WMD, and the controversy continues on the political level. The issue has now reached a new level in the UK with the tragic death of Dr. Kelly." PEARSON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04