Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ROME3277 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ROME3277 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2003-07-18 09:16:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | ECON SENV TSPL KSCA EAID PGOV IT EUN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 003277 SIPDIS DEPT FOR EB, OES/EGC, EUR/ERA,EUR/WE DEPT PLEASE PASS USDA FOR FAS/SIMMONS, BLUM, AND MACKE DEPT PLEASE PASS USDOC FOR 4212/ITA/OEURA/CPD/DEFALCO DEPT PLEASE PASS US EPA OPC STEPHEN JOHNSON DEPT PLEASE PASS USTR/NOUECCI E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/03/2013 TAGS: ECON, SENV, TSPL, KSCA, EAID, PGOV, IT, EUN SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR RAISES CLIMATE CHANGE, EU CHEMICALS POLICY, AND BIOTECHNOLOGY WITH MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENT Classified By: Ambassador Mel Sembler for reasons 1.5 B and d. 1. (C) Summary. Ambassador met Minister of Environment Altero Matteoli July 2 to discuss priority issues that might emerge during the Italian EU Presidency. Ambassador praised Italy's position on climate change and Kyoto, pointing out that PM Berlusconi had taken a significant political risk in promoting research cooperation with the U.S. at a time when most member states were critical of the President's decision to withdraw from the Kyoto protocol. On the EU chemicals proposal (REACH), Matteoli said that industry would have to deal with environment ministries and their concerns, but the days were past when environment ministries were enemies of industry. Matteoli added that he would include economic considerations in the Italian appproach. Despite strong representations from Ambassador on the need for strong science-based policy on biotechnology, Matteoli said the only solution for Italy would be found in a complex, step-by-step political process. He acknowledged the successful blocking role of Agriculture Minister Alemanno. End summary. 2. (U) Ambassador hosted Minister of Environment Altero Matteoli for lunch at the residence on July 2. Matteoli was accompanied by his diplomatic adviser, Gabrielle Sardo, and Director General for International Activities Corrado Clini. Ambassador was joined by ECMIN and EST Counselor. AMBASSADOR'S CALL FOR LEADERSHIP ON BIOTECH UNANSWERED 3. (C) Ambassador contrasted the leadership shown by the GOI on climate change in 2001, when PM Berlusconi announced on the eve of the Genoa G-8 summit a new commitment to research cooperation with the U.S. outside of Kyoto, with the much slower GOI approach to biotechnology policy. Matteoli replied that the biotechnology question was far more complicated politically than Kyoto, in large measure because the ideological convictions of MINAG Alemanno made him less receptive to mediation efforts, even within Alleanza Nazionale (AN), the party of Alemanno and Matteoli. According to the Minister, the only solutions possible for Italy will lie in slow and careful political moves. Matteoli dismissed the weight of scientific opinions, labelling scientists as outliers in the public debate. Matteoli said that he had worked hard on the EU traceability and labeling proposals to keep at least an opening for biotechnology in Europe. While Alemanno might follow him one step, the Minister of Agriculture would not allow himself to be led very far on the issue. Matteoli held out little hope of effective mediation with Alemanno even within AN, pointing out that the wings of the party were sharply divided on biotechnology policy. He claimed that Alemanno's convictions were genuinely felt, and formed under the ideological mentorship of a strong rightwing leader, Pino Rauti, who was for a time Alemanno's father-in-law as well. 4. (C) Embassy comments: Although DG Clini floated the possibility of a "consultation" with the U.S. on biotechnology after the European Parliament votes on F&F and T&L July 2-3, we doubt we can get much leverage with the GOI, as EU President, through a meeting led by the MOE. We continue to worry that Alemanno, a strong supporter of the coexistence language amending 01/018, will use this language to step over the Ministry of Environment and others in the GOI to exclude from Italy even those biotech products approved by the EU under the new directives and regulations. End comment. A BALANCED APPROACH ON CHEMICALS POLICY.... 5. (C) REACH, the European Chemicals Policy, is still caught between the competencies of the Environment Council and the Competitiveness Council, according to Matteoli. The Minister observed that however the decision turns out, the chemicals industry will have to work with environment ministries. These ministries, he argued, are no longer a priori hostile to industry, but do have a responsibility to protect the public and the environment while simultaneously promoting economic growth. Ambassador noted that U.S. companies had invested more than $2.5 billion in Italy, and that U.S. companies were concerned with the potential high costs of the REACH proposal. Matteoli said that a discussion of REACH at European level could take place during the Italian EU Presidency, but that the Irish Presidency would have to carry forward the work. The Minister added that the record of the chemicals industry would make credible work on regulation more difficult in Italy, since state-owned industry had for years not only contributed to dangerous pollution, but had used the threat of job losses in negotiations with unions and local governmental authorities to delay the implementation of environmental safety rules. SOME CLIMATE CHANGE "BUSINESS" WITH THE RUSSIANS, THE EU, AND US... 6.(C) Looking toward COP-9 of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC), to be hosted by the MOE in Milan in early December, the Ministry is preoccupied with what to do if Russia ratifies the Kyoto Protocol, and what to do if it does not. The EU, and Minister Matteoli in particular, has been in Moscow several times in recent months to explore the issue of Russian ratification. According to the Italians, talks have boiled down to the price per ton of carbon dioxide Russia could sell the EU to help the EU meet its targets. The Russians have reportedly opened at USD forty per ton, while the EU started at about USD five per ton. 7.(C) If Russian ratification does not occur, and Kyoto does not come into force, the MOE may open during the Italian EU Presidency an internal EU dialogue on what to do next in the face of the EU and member state ratifications of the Protocol. 8.(SBU) DG Clini confirmed decisions taken in Washington June 17 to organize a bilateral energy meeting in Califiornia in September, and a side event at COP-9 to highlight the results of U.S.-Italy cooperation in climate change. Clini reiterated his hope that a twinning agreement could be struck between the region of Lombardia and the State of California on hydrogen technologies. AND FIRST STEPS TOWARD COOPERATION WITH THE DEVELOPING WORLD 9.(U) Ambassador noted to the Minister our satisfaction with the new agreement on geospatial technologies and applications signed at the June 17-18 S&T bilaterals, and the agreement to work on geothermal projects in East Africa and to cooperate on environmental projects in Iraq. Such partnerships can demonstrate to the developing world the seriousness with which both countries take environmental stewardship. 10.(C) Embassy Comment. Matteoli began the luncheon conversation stiffly but warmed to the Ambassador's questions about coalition politics and its future, having some fun with key ministers like Bossi and Tremonti: the Finance Minister is reportedly the only coalition minister who will dine with Bossi. He spoke clearly to divisions within his own AN party--an internal division is 100 times worse than a controversy between parties, he opined. The Minister is obviously more comfortable in the political arena, in which he characterizes himself as a mediator, than in technical discussions of even the major issues in his portfolio. Sembler NNNN 2003ROME03277 - Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04