Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03TEGUCIGALPA1655 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03TEGUCIGALPA1655 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Tegucigalpa |
| Created: | 2003-07-14 13:10:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | CASC HO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS TEGUCIGALPA 001655 SIPDIS FOR CI/OCS/WHA, CA/OCS/ACS AND WHA/CEN E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: CASC, HO SUBJECT: CONSULAR MEETING WITH HONDURAN CENTRAL AUTHORITY ON HAGUE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION CASES 1. SUMMARY: On July 10, 2003, Deputy Consul General and LES Consular Specialist met with the Interim Director of the Instituto Hondureno de la Ninez y la Familia (IHNFA), Attorney Luis Erasmo Elvir. The IHNFA is the Designated Central Authority in Honduras for the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Consular reps presented IHNFA Director with a new Hague application and much to our dismay the IHNFA stated that the Hague Convention on Child Abduction could not be applied in Honduras because the GOH had not yet ratified the convention. END OF SUMMARY. 2. On July 9, 2003, Post learned that IHNFA's Director, Attorney Maria Elena de Carbajal had resigned and that Attorney Luis Erasmo Elvir was currently Acting Interim Director. We made an appointment with Attorney Elvin to submit a new application under the Hague for the return of Amcit Kevin Obed Berrios. On July 11, 2003 at 2:00 p.m., Deputy Consul General and LES Consular Specialist met with the Interim Director, Attorney Erasmo Elvir, and his legal assessors, Attorney Melissa Calix and Attorney Alba Cecilia Mena de Beln. As we were submitting the Obed Berrios application, we were informed that the Hague Convention on Child Abduction could not be applied in Honduras because the GOH had not yet ratified the convention. We were surprised to hear this from the IHNFA reps, since we had raised this issue with them back in July 27, 1998, and were under the impression that they understood the mechanics of the Hague Convention. 3. Once again, Consular reps explained that the applicability issue was settled in July 2001 when Ambassador Policarpo Callejas, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Advisor, confirmed that since both Honduras and the USA are signatories to the Vienna Convention, the Hague Convention International Child Abduction is in force between the two countries. The Vienna Convention Article 27 states that a country may not invoke the provisions of its internal law (ratification requirement) as justification for its failure to implement specific provisions of a treaty. 4. The IHNFA reps provided us with a copy of a letter dated May 30, 2003 addressed to the President of the Honduran Congress, Porfiro Lobo, in which they requested that Congress define the applicability of the Hague Convention in Honduras. Consular reps agreed to provide IHNFA with copies of all the documentation we have indicating that this issue has already been resolved. We will also send, via appropriate Embassy channels, a letter to Mr. Lobo, with the same documentation, requesting a prompt response to IHNFA's original inquiry. It would appear that IHNFA is unwilling to apply the Hague without the expressed permission of the Honduran Congress, even though that permission is not required. Post will continue to actively pursue resolution of this matter, as we will continue to receive Hague applications and we wish to see them processed without undue delay by the GOH. Post will advise the Department of any new developments as they become available. PALMER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04