Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ROME3111 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ROME3111 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2003-07-09 05:18:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | AORC EAGR KUNR FAO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ROME 003111 SIPDIS USDA FOR FAS/LYNN REICH AND DICK HUGHES USDA/APHIS FOR JOHN GREIFER USDA/FSIS FOR ED SCARBROUGH STATE FOR IO/EDA SETH WINNICK AND IO/S GEORGE ABRAHAMS USAID FOR RALPH CUMMINGS PARIS FOR UNESCO MONTREAL FOR ICAO FROM FODAG E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: AORC, EAGR, KUNR, FAO SUBJECT: REPORT OF 124TH FAO COUNCIL Ref: a) Rome 02589, b) Rome 01658, c) Rome 02546 1. Summary: The 124th Session of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Council met June 23-28 in Rome. In a successful outcome to a four-year campaign by assorted OECD members, the Council agreed to transmit to the 32nd FAO Conference an amendment to the FAO Basic Texts to introduce a two-term, 10-year limit for the FAO Director General (DG) position. The G-77 (particularly African members) pushed hard to have Council explicitly acknowledge the DG's eligibility to run again at the next elections; after prolonged negotiations, USDel succeeded in ensuring that the Council decision is silent concerning the incumbent. The Council also endorsed a U.S. agenda item and proposal on improving reporting on World Food Summit follow-up. As expected, the Council did not take a final position on the 2004-2005 budget level, but did acknowledge the need for the Secretariat to prepare a zero nominal growth (ZNG) budget scenario. Although the DG may still choose not to prepare such a scenario, this is an important step for the U.S. and other ZNG supporters. Citing budget woes at home, the Japanese delegation requested a "less than ZNG scenario" and argued (unsuccessfully) for the Council to consider its proposal to increase Asian participation in the FAO Finance and Program Committees. The Japanese delegation told USDel that their government was re-examining Japan's continued participation in FAO. End summary. 2. The 124th session of the FAO Council met June 23-28, 2003 in Rome. USDA Deputy Undersecretary Jim Butler headed the U.S. delegation, with Ambassador Tony P. Hall serving as Alternate. The Independent Chair of Council, Ambassador Aziz Mekouar (Morocco) chaired the session. The United States represented North America in the drafting committee. 3. Agenda item 1, Adoption of the Agenda. ------------------------------------------ The Council agreed to add new agenda items on "Reporting on World Food Summit Follow-up" (U.S. proposal) and "Composition of the Program and Finance Committees" (Japanese proposal). 4. Agenda Item 3, Summary Program of Work and Budget --------------------------------------------- ------- As expected, the Council did not take a final position on the budget level for the Summary Program of Work and Budget (SPWB) 2004-2005. The United States, Australia and Canada requested a ZNG scenario; the G-77 (with some exceptions, notably Malaysia, which joined in requesting a ZNG scenario) for the most part spoke in support of the DG's real growth (RG) proposal. The EU requested the Secretariat to consider a scenario somewhere between ZNG SIPDIS and ZRG which covered exchange rate losses, but which absorbed cost increases and a first tranche of funding for after-service medical liabilities. Other OECD members also stressed the importance of addressing unfunded after-service medical liabilities, albeit without offering specific solutions. Japan stated that it would only be able to support a budget which saw a "decline in Japan's assessment" and requested that a "less-than-ZNG scenario" be prepared. 5. During Drafting Committee discussion of the SPWB, RG supporters strongly objected to including a request for a ZNG scenario. After extensive negotiations between supporters of ZNG, ZRG and RG, members finally agreed that the Council would "acknowledged the need for the Secretariat to prepare a ZNG scenario in order for SIPDIS members to fully understand the implications of a possible budget decisions." Comment: Budget Director Tony Wade refused to comment on whether the Secretariat would indeed prepare a ZNG budget based on the Report language, indicating that the decision would be taken by the DG. Nonetheless, ZNG supporters considered the language an important first step towards that end. End Comment. 6. Concerning priorities for the 2004-2005 budget, the Council agreed that the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) "should be funded to the level of the biennial business plan, and that FAO should provide its share of the additional resources required for the accepted recommendations of the Joint FAO/WHO evaluation of the Codex Alimentarius Commission to be implemented in the full." The report also notes that, as agreed at the FAO Program Committee (reftel A), the proposed funding for a "Food Chain Approach" which actually related to the failed FAO proposal of the same name (reftel B) would be reallocated to Codex activities. 7. Agenda Item 4, Report of the Committee on Commodity Problems --------------------------------------------- -------- Reflecting the U.S. position taken during the Committee on Commodity Problems (CCP), the Council endorsed the report of the 64th Session of the CCP "recalling that one member had disassociated from the consensus adoption of the Report and had maintained that position." 8. Agenda Items 5 and 3, Committees on Forestry and Fisheries --------------------------------------------- --------- The Council endorsed the reports of the Committees on Forestry and Fisheries. 9. Agenda Item 6, Report of the Committee on Agriculture --------------------------------------------- ----------- The Council endorsed the Report of the Committee on Agriculture (COAG) and welcomed the announcement that the DG would convene a special session of COAG in early 2004 to review the Report of the Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation on Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Disease. The Council noted the concerns of some members that the recommendations could result in changes in demand with adverse impacts on small producers and the agricultural economies of developing countries. Under the Report of COAG and the Report of the Committee on Commodity Problems, members also supported having the Secretariat propose ways to reduce the total number of SIPDIS days allotted to the two meetings, possibly by holding them jointly or back to back. A proposal along these lines will be sent to the next Council session. 10. Agenda Item 7, Report of the Committee on World Food Security --------------------------------------------- -------- Ambassador Tony P. Hall delivered the U.S. intervention on the Report of the Committee on World Food Security (CFS). The Council considered the proposal to improve the reporting format for the World Food Summit (WFS) follow- up on the basis of the request put forward by the United States and supported by the EU. The Council endorsed the proposal that the CFS Secretariat, in close collaboration with the Bureau, should: --analyze the difficulties and the underlying reasons in the current reporting process; -- examine ways of improving the existing reporting system; --identify a set of appropriate qualitative and quantitative indicators based on experience with FIVIMS and previous reporting mechanisms, including the impact of HIV/AIDS on food security; --supplement the report with case studies of successfully country experiences from which lessons learned could be extracted. The reporting should be based on simplified and improved methodology. 11. The Council recommended that the draft revised format be developed in consultation with the CFS bureau and submitted to the forthcoming session of the FAO Council. 12. Agenda Item 8, Convening of the Second Global Forum of Food Safety Regulators --------------------------------------------- ------ The Council endorsed the proposal to hold a Second Global Forum of Food Safety Regulators during the second half of 2004 on the main theme of "Building Effective Food Safety Systems." The Government of Thailand offered to host the Forum. 13. Agenda Item 9, Report of the World Food Program --------------------------------------------- ------- Ambassador Tony P. Hall delivered the U.S. intervention on the Report of the World Food Program. The Council "reaffirmed its support for WFP's dual mandate to assist the hungry poor in both emergency situations and in the field of development and expressed its support for WFP's innovative efforts to increase the level of resources provided by non-traditional donors, particularly the private sector." 14. Agenda Item 10, Preparations for the 32nd Session of the FAO General Conference --------------------------------------------- -------- The Minister of Agriculture and Trade of New Zealand will chair the Conference. The Vice-Chairs are: Austria (name not yet known) and Iran (FAO Ambassador Nouri-Naeeni). Canada will represent North America on the Credentials Committee. There will be three ministerial-level round tables. The Secretariat will contact regional groups concerning proposed themes and logistics. The deadline for nominations for the Independent Chair of Council is September 5; for election to Council, November 29 at 12:00. 15. Agenda Item 15, Report of the Finance Committee --------------------------------------------- ------ The Council approved the proposed scale of assessments. The Council took note of Argentina's request to have its assessment be reduced along the lines of the reduction at the UN, but took no action on the request. Concerning the Split Currency Assessment Proposal, the Council took note of the differing views presented (including U.S. objections) and agreed that the matter would need to be considered in greater depth at the upcoming Finance Committee session. 16. Under the Finance Committee Sub-Item on "Methodology for Determination of Equitable Geographic Distribution," the Council noted that the September 2003 Finance Committee session would conduct a further analysis of the options for the methodology prior to submitting a recommendation to the Council at its next session. The Report states the U.S. position as follows: "Another member stated that practices to promote adequate representation of under-represented countries would need to be implemented before looking at any proposal to change the system of equitable geographic distribution." 17. Agenda Item 16, the Number and Length of Term of the Office of the Director General --------------------------------------------- ---------- As reported in Reftel C, documentation for this agenda was still not available at the opening of Council. USDel met numerous times during the week with the Friends of the Chair, seeking to resolve the question of what would be put before the Council for decision. At the outset, the G-77 and the EU supported having the Council "approve" a report of the Friends of the Chair (provided by the Chair on June 20). The Chair's June 20 report contained language concerning the incumbent's eligibility to run again which was inconsistent with the Group's decision to be "silent" on the question of transition measures. (Comment: Other OECD members of the Friends group -- Australia, New Zealand and Canada -- told USDel privately that they could accept the language of the report as a Council decision but were supportive duringTION 04 OF 05 ROME 003111 USDA FOR FAS/LYNN REICH AND DICK HUGHES USDA/APHIS FOR JOHN GREIFER USDA/FSIS FOR ED SCARBROUGH STATE FOR IO/EDA SETH WINNICK AND IO/S GEORGE ABRAHAMS USAID FOR RALPH CUMMINGS PARIS FOR UNESCO MONTREAL F negotiations. End comment). 18. The Group finally agreed to put before Council: -- A Council decision (CL/124/13) which "agreed to transmit the proposed amendment to Article VII.1 of the Constitution that "the DG should be appointed for a term of six years, renewable only once for a further term of four years," to the FAO Committee on Constitutional and Legal Matters, at its 75th Session, in October 2003, along with document CL/123/INF/22 before being submitted to the 32nd Session of the Conference for adoption." -- A Council information document (CL 124/INF/22) containing the Report of the Friends of the Chair (with improved language negotiated by USDel) 19. The Chair put the decision before the Council on Thursday, June 27 after a brief introduction. In his introductory reports, the Chair did not mention the content of the Report of the Friends of the Chair, and made no reference to the incumbent. Te decision was adopted by acclamation with no coments from the floor. 20. The Report of the Frinds of the Chair, in its final form, provided th view of the Legal Counsel that, in the absence f transitional measures, the Conference "would hve the authority to elect under the new system anyof the nominated candidates." The rights of the ncumbent are not specifically mentioned. The Reort also states that the revision of Article VII1 would apply to the election at the 33rd Sessio of Conference in 2005 and govern the mandates o the Directors-General from 1 January 2006. (Commnt: the entry into force was already agreed at te 123rd Council session which established the madate of the Friends of the Chair Group. End commet). 21. Agenda Item 16.5, Japanese request on omposition of Finance and Program Committees --------------------------------------------- ----- Japan, supported by the Republic of Korea, circulaed two proposals to amend FAO's Basic Texts concrning membership of the Program and Finance Commttees in order to increase Asian representation o the Committees. As expected, the proposals wer strongly objected to by other regions that saw threat to their presence on these Committees. he Council agreed that the Asia Regional Group culd continue to hold further consultations with other regional groups to further advance the issue The Council did not agree to place the item onthe agenda for the next session (as the Japaneserequested). 22. Agenda Item 18 - Appointment t the UN Joint Staff Pension Committee --------------------------------------------- ------ The Concil confirmed the appointment of Mr. Bruce Bertn, Alternate Permanent Representative of the Unite States as a member to the Staff Pension Committe for the period ending 31 December 2004 to replace and complete the term of office of Mr. Chris Rchard. 23. Comment: on Term Limits and Japanes participation in FAO --------------------------------------------- --------- Council endorsemet of Term Limits represents a successful outcome to a four-year campaign by assorted OECD members,albeit, with one more hurdle to pass (the 32nd FAO Conference) and without a prohibition on the incumbent running again (as U.S. had originally sought). However, in its final form, the Report of the Chair is neutral on the question of the incumbent and the Council Decision itself makes no mention of transitional measures. 24. The Japanese delegation expressed disappointed to USDel at the outcome of Council and commented that Japan's continued participation in the FAO was being re- examined in Tokyo. The Japanese Perm Rep noted in this context that Japan had not yet paid its 2003 assessment. We understand that the FAO Director General appears to be seriously seeking to increase Japanese staffing at the FAO (another perennial source of unhappiness for the Japanese). Hall NNNN 2003ROME03111 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04