Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 97AMMAN5383 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 97AMMAN5383 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Amman |
| Created: | 1997-06-05 13:40:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | KISL PGOV PINR PTER JO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
P 051340Z JUN 97 FM AMEMBASSY AMMAN TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2498 INFO ARAB ISRAELI COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 AMMAN 005383 PARIS FOR LEAF LONDON FOR TUELLER SANAA FOR STANLEY E.O. 12958: DECL: 6/05/02 TAGS: KISL, PGOV, PINR, PTER, JO SUBJECT: THE ISLAMIC ACTION FRONT: SOMETIMES A PLATFORM IS MORE TROUBLE THAN IT'S WORTH 1. CLASSIFIED BY POLITICAL COUNSELOR ROBERTA NEWELL FOR REASON 1.5 (D). 2. (U) SUMMARY: A COMMON REFRAIN AMONG OBSERVERS OF JORDAN'S ISLAMIC ACTION FRONT (IAF) IS CONDEMNATION OF THE INFURIATINGLY VAGUE NATURE OF THE PARTY'S POLITICAL PLATFORM. AN OPPONENT OF THE PEACE PROCESS AND A VOCAL CRITIC OF MYRIAD GOJ INITIATIVES, THE IAF OFFERS JORDAN'S VOTERS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE USUAL PARADE OF GOVERNMENT YES-MEN. THE PARTY'S VISION FOR JORDAN'S FUTURE AS AN ISLAMIC STATE IS, HOWEVER, BLURRY AT BEST. THE IAF'S REFUSAL TO DELINEATE ITS OSTENSIBLE RAISON D'ETRE BEYOND A HIGH-MINDED CALL FOR "ISLAM" AS THE BASIS OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION CAN BE SEEN AS PART OF A PRAGMATIC STRATEGY FOR SELF-PRESERVATION. AS JORDAN'S ONLY "ISLAMIC" PARTY, THE IAF STEERS A COURSE DESIGNED TO PLEASE ITS MEMBERSHIP, ITS POLITICAL CONSTITUENCY, AND THE GOJ. END SUMMARY. --------------------------------------------- ------------ WHAT DO THEY STAND FOR? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING (SAY IT AGAIN) --------------------------------------------- ------------ 3. (C) THE GOJ, IN ITS MORE DEFENSIVE MOMENTS, HAS BEEN KNOWN TO CHASTISE THE COUNTRY'S OPPOSITION, AND THE ISLAMIC ACTION FRONT (IAF) IN PARTICULAR, FOR ITS ALMOST PURELY REACTIVE STANCE ON POLICY ISSUES. SIMILAR GRUMBLINGS ABOUT THE IAF'S NOTORIOUSLY DIAPHANOUS PLATFORM CAN BE HEARD AMONG THE GENERAL PUBLIC, WHO WONDER, FOUR YEARS AFTER THE IAF'S OFFICIAL REGISTRATION, JUST WHAT IT IS THE PARTY HOPES TO ACCOMPLISH. THE QUESTION HAS EVEN, OF LATE, RESONATED WITHIN THE PARTY ITSELF, CULMINATING IN RUMORS LAST JANUARY OF A SPLIT BETWEEN SO-CALLED "DOVES" AND "HAWKS" OVER WHETHER THE PARTY SHOULD CONSIDER JOINING THE GOVERNMENT. THE "DOVES," LED BY PARLIAMENTARY DEPUTIES ABDULLAH AKAILEH AND BASSAM EMOUSH, ARGUED THAT IT WAS TIME FOR THE IAF TO REFOCUS ITS ENERGIES ON ADDRESSING THE COUNTRY'S DOMESTIC ILLS. EVEN THOSE SYMPATHETIC TO THE IAF'S STATED AIMS HAVE EXPRESSED FRUSTRATION WITH ITS DITHERING. THEEB ABDULLAH, AN ISLAMIST MP WHO WAS A MEMBER OF THE IAF'S PARLIAMENTARY BLOC BETWEEN 1994 AND 1996, TRACED HIS SPLIT WITH THE PARTY TO THE IAF'S FAILURE TO GO BEYOND THE SLOGAN "ISLAM IS THE SOLUTION" AND "ACTUALLY HELP PEOPLE." THE TENDENCY ACROSS THE BOARD HAS BEEN TO TAKE THE IAF'S FAILURE TO AGREE ON A DETAILED PLATFORM AS EVIDENCE OF ITS FUNDAMENTAL WEAKNESS AS A POLITICAL PARTY. IN REALITY, THE PLATFORM'S VERY VAGUENESS HAS BEEN PART OF A PRAGMATIC AND POLITICALLY SAVVY DECISION BY THE IAF TO DEFER UNNECESSARY AND POTENTIALLY DIVISIVE DEBATES TO THE DISTANT FUTURE. ------------------------------------ THE PLATFORM (YES, THEY DO HAVE ONE) ------------------------------------ 4. (U) THE ISLAMIC ACTION FRONT'S PARTY PLATFORM WAS FORMULATED IN 1993, WHEN THE PARTY WAS FIRST REGISTERED, AND HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED SINCE. MORE AKIN TO A CHARTER, THE PLATFORM SETS OUT BROAD GUIDELINES FOR THE PARTY'S ORIENTATION AND LEAVES THE SPECIFICS TO SOME AS YET UNREACHED FUTURE DATE. THE MOST IMPORTANT GOAL FOR THE IAF IS "THE RESUMPTION OF ISLAMIC LIFE AND THE APPLICATION OF SHARIA LAW IN ALL FIELDS." SECOND IS OPPOSITION TO THE PEACE PROCESS; A KEY OBJECTIVE FOR THE PARTY IS "THE PREPARATION OF THE NATION FOR ARMED CONFLICT AGAINST THE ZIONIST AND IMPERIALIST ENEMIES," AND "NON-RECOGNITION OF THE USURPER JEWISH ENTITY." THE PLATFORM CALLS FOR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF LIBERTY AND DEMOCRACY THROUGH SHURA (CONSULTATION) AND THE PROTECTION OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION. IT ADVOCATES ESTABLISHING AN ECONOMY BASED ON ISLAMIC PRINCIPLES, "WHICH ENSURES SOCIAL EQUALITY, PROTECTING INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY, PROVIDING EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES, AND COMBATTING CORRUPTION AND UNEMPLOYMENT." THE PLATFORM ALSO SETS OUT "MEANS AND METHODS" FOR ACHIEVING THESE OBJECTIVES. THESE ARE PRIMARILY THROUGH THE DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION, STUDIES, AND PARTICIPATION IN PARLIAMENT. 5. (U) IN THE FOUR YEARS SINCE THE PLATFORM'S PROMULGATION THE PARTY HAS, TO A CERTAIN EXTENT, REFINED ITS POSITIONS ON A NUMBER OF ISSUES, PRIMARILY IN THE FORM OF COMMUNIQUES TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. IN THESE STATEMENTS THE IAF HAS BEEN ALMOST ENTIRELY REACTIVE, RESPONDING TO GOJ DECISIONS OR WORLD EVENTS AS THEY ARISE, WITHIN AN ANTI-ISRAELI, ANTI-WESTERN AND ANTI-GOJ FRAMEWORK. IN THE PAST YEAR ALONE THE IAF HAS ISSUED STATEMENTS OPPOSING THE RULE OF THE TALEBAN REGIME IN AFGHANISTAN FOR ITS "UNISLAMIC" CHARACTER, EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE GOVERNMENT IN SUDAN, CONDEMNING U.S. TREATMENT OF MUSA ABU MARZOUK, OPPOSING GOJ POLICY ON PUBLIC FREEDOMS, AND CALLING FOR THE ABROGATION OF THE JORDAN-ISRAEL PEACE TREATY. NOTABLY, THERE HAVE BEEN REMARKABLY FEW COMMUNIQUES DETAILING THE IAF'S VISION OF AN "ISLAMIC" JORDAN, ITS OSTENSIBLE RAISON D'ETRE. 6. (C) IN A MAY 15 MEETING WITH POLOFF, THE ISLAMIC ACTION FRONT'S MODERATE SECRETARY GENERAL, ISHAQ FARHAN (PROTECT), ELABORATED (SEEMINGLY RELUCTANTLY) ON THE ISLAMIST MOVEMENT'S PLANS FOR AN ISLAMIST-GOVERNED JORDAN. FARHAN SPOKE IN VAGUE TERMS ABOUT ISLAM SETTING "GUIDELINES" FOR APPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR, UNTIL PRESSED WITH SPECIFIC QUESTIONS. POLOFF ASKED ABOUT THE IAF'S INTERPRETATION OF CERTAIN ASPECTS OF ISLAMIC LAW. WOULD HANDS BE CUT OFF IN CASES OF THEFT? FARHAN WOULD NOT RULE IT OUT ENTIRELY, COMPARING IT TO THE DEATH PENALTY AS APPROPRIATE FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS GUILTY OF "TERRIBLE CRIMES." HE DISMISSED EXECUTION AS A PUNISHMENT FOR APOSTASY, SAYING THAT INDIVIDUALS ARE FREE TO CHANGE THEIR RELIGION. THE DEATH PENALTY IS ONLY JUSTIFIED, HE SAID, IN CASES WHERE CONVERTS "ATTACK ISLAM" AND TRY TO WOO MUSLIMS AWAY FROM THE FAITH. FARHAN CONCEDED THAT JORDAN IS "FAIRLY ISLAMIC," AND THAT THE IAF AGREES FOR THE MOST PART WITH POLICIES AS THEY ARE TODAY. THE NOTABLE EXCEPTIONS ARE ALCOHOL AND MONETARY INTEREST. THE IAF HAS REPEATEDLY PROPOSED BANNING ALCOHOL. MUSLIMS, SAID FARHAN, SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BUY, SELL, OR PRODUCE ALCOHOL. CHRISTIANS WOULD STILL BE ABLE TO BUY AND CONSUME ALCOHOL. BANKS, HE WENT ON, SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CHARGE INTEREST ON LOANS. FARHAN ALSO EXPRESSED THE HOPE THAT AT SOME TIME IN THE DISTANT FUTURE THERE WOULD EXIST A "UNITED STATES OF ARABIA." THE MUSING TONE OF FARHAN'S RESPONSES DURING THE MEETING LEFT POLOFF WITH THE IMPRESSION THAT THE SECRETARY GENERAL WAS NOT SPEAKING FOR HIS PARTY AS A WHOLE, BUT WAS IN FACT EXTRAPOLATING FROM HIS OWN BELIEFS AND VIEWPOINTS (IN SOME CASES APPARENTLY FOR THE FIRST TIME) AS TO THE APPROPRIATE INTERPRETATION OF ISLAMIC LAW FOR JORDAN. --------------------------------------- LACK OF SPECIFICITY IS THE KEY TO UNITY --------------------------------------- 7. (C) THE IAF'S FAILURE TO COME TO GRIPS WITH THE OVERRIDING ISSUE OF HOW TO INTERPRET ISLAMIC LAW STEMS IN LARGE PART FROM THE SURPRISINGLY WIDE VARIETY OF BELIEF AND PRACTICE AMONG ITS MEMBERS. (PARTY OFFICIALS NUMBER IAF MEMBERSHIP IN THE "THOUSANDS.") MEMBERS TAKE ALL SHAPES: IBRAHIM GHARAIBEH, A THIRTY-SOMETHING MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MEMBER, IS CLEAN-SHAVEN AND SHAKES HANDS WITH WOMEN. NAWAL FAOURI, A MEMBER OF THE IAF'S SHURA COUNCIL, IS THE HEADMISTRESS OF THREE SCHOOLS, AND CONSIDERS POLITICAL ACTIVISM A "RESPONSIBILITY" FOR WOMEN. ABDUL MUNEM ABU ZANT, A PARLIAMENTARIAN KNOWN FOR HIS FIERY RHETORIC, ADVOCATES THE WEARING OF HEADSCARVES BY GIRLS AS YOUNG AS EIGHT YEARS OLD AND, ACCORDING TO A CANADIAN EMBASSY SECURITY SOURCE (PROTECT), HAS BEEN REFUSED ENTRY TO CANADA FOR HIS HAMAS FUNDRAISING ACTIVITIES THERE. EACH OF THESE INDIVIDUALS BELIEVES THAT FOR JORDAN, "ISLAM IS THE SOLUTION." HOWEVER, EACH ONE ALSO HAS A UNIQUE CONCEPTION OF WHAT ISLAM REQUIRES OF ITS BELIEVERS AND OF THE MOST APPROPRIATE WAY FOR ISLAM TO BE IMPLEMENTED. GHARAIBEH, ECHOING THE PARTY LINE, HAS CALLED THIS DIVERGENCE IN OPINION "A SOURCE OF STRENGTH" FOR THE PARTY, BECAUSE IT ALLOWS FOR OPEN DEBATE AND DISCUSSION OF ISSUES. THE IAF LEADERSHIP APPARENTLY ALSO VIEWS IT AS A POTENTIAL SOURCE OF WEAKNESS, AS FINAL DECISIONS, OR EVEN DISCUSSION, ON DIVISIVE ISSUES SUCH AS THE APPROPRIATE ROLE FOR WOMEN COULD CONCEIVABLY UNRAVEL THE PARTY'S DELICATE WEB OF LINKS AMONG ISLAMISTS OF ALL STRIPES. TO AVOID SUCH AN EVENTUALITY THE PARTY HAS STUCK ASSIDUOUSLY TO GENERAL TOPICS: OPPOSITION TO PEACE WITH ISRAEL, PAN-ARAB UNITY, AND PROMOTION OF PUBLIC FREEDOMS. ----------------------------------- THE VOTERS: A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS ----------------------------------- 8. (U) THE PARTY HAS ALSO CLEARLY COME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT IN ATTRACTING SUPPORT (AND VOTES) AMONG THE POPULACE, SPECIFICS ARE MORE OF A LIABILITY THAN AN ADVANTAGE. THE COUNTRY'S ISLAMISTS CONTINUE TO BE SUBJECTED TO PUBLIC RIDICULE FOR THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD'S HANDLING OF THE EDUCATION, SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND AWQAF PORTFOLIOS IN THE GOVERNMENT OF PRIME MINISTER MUDAR BADRAN IN 1990. PUBLIC OPPOSITION TO MINISTER OF EDUCATION ABDULLAH AKAILEH'S PROPOSAL TO BAN FATHERS FROM THE BASKETBALL GAMES OF THEIR SCHOOLGIRL DAUGHTERS IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE MODESTY OF THE OTHER PLAYERS HAS TAUGHT THE IAF THAT WHILE JORDANIANS ARE BY AND LARGE SOCIALLY CONSERVATIVE, THEIR BRAND OF RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCE IS TEMPERED WITH A HEALTHY DOSE OF COMMON SENSE. INSTEAD, THE PARTY PREFERS TO TRADE ON ITS STRENGTH AS JORDAN'S ONLY PARTY PURPORTING TO REPRESENT ISLAM. FOR NOW THE IAF CONTINUES TO GARNER SUPPORT FROM THE MANY JORDANIANS WHO BELIEVE THAT AN "ISLAMIC" PARTY MUST NECESSARILY BE BETTER (MORE HONEST, MORE MORAL, MORE IN LINE WITH GOD'S WILL) THAN NON-ISLAMIC PARTIES, AND GIVE LITTLE THOUGHT TO THE DETAILS. THERE IS SOME EVIDENCE, HOWEVER, THAT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS STRATEGY IS BEGINNING TO WANE. FOUR YEARS AFTER THE PARTY'S FOUNDING, MANY SUCH SUPPORTERS ARE BEGINNING TO QUESTION WHETHER THE IAF IS, IN FACT, DIFFERENT FROM THE REST AND WILL EVER BE EFFECTIVE IN BRINGING ABOUT SOCIAL CHANGE. THESE GRUMBLINGS HAVE LED SOME OBSERVERS TO BELIEVE THAT POPULAR SUPPORT FOR THE IAF IS ACTUALLY DIMINISHING. FOR THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE, HOWEVER, THE IAF SEEMS TO HAVE DETERMINED THAT ITS COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE IN POLICY TERMS LIES WITH INACTION. THE PARTY MAY HAVE TO RETHINK ITS STRATEGY IF, AS IS POSSIBLE, THE IAF SEES A REDUCTION IN ITS PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION AFTER THE NOVEMBER ELECTIONS. --------------------------------------------- -------- JORDAN'S NASCENT DEMOCRACY: NOT READY FOR THE DETAILS --------------------------------------------- -------- 9. (C) THE LIMITED NATURE OF JORDAN'S DEMOCRATIC EXPERIMENT ALSO PUTS A CONSIDERABLE DAMPER ON ANY ATTEMPTS BY IAF MEMBERS TO BRING THEIR PARTY'S AIMS MORE CLEARLY INTO FOCUS. THE VAGARIES OF THE CURRENT ELECTORAL LAW, WHICH IS WEIGHTED IN FAVOR OF PRO- GOVERNMENT, TRIBAL CANDIDATES, AND THE CONCENTRATION OF POWER IN THE EXECUTIVE GIVE THE IAF LITTLE INCENTIVE TO GO OUT ON A LIMB IN ITS POLICY PRONOUNCEMENTS. WITH NO CHANCE OF GAINING POWER, THERE IS SIMPLY NO NEED. MOREOVER, BY AGREEING TO ACT AS A PART OF THE COUNTRY'S "LOYAL OPPOSITION" AND OPERATE WITHIN THE GUIDELINES OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES LAW, THE IAF HAS LIMITED LATITUDE TO ADVOCATE TRULY SIGNIFICANT POLITICAL CHANGE. THE 1992 PARTIES LAW REQUIRES THAT ALL PARTIES ABIDE BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION (WHICH RESERVES VIRTUALLY ALL POWERS FOR THE KING) AND WORK TO PRESERE JORDAN'S INDEPENDENCE. THE LAW RULES OUT ANY ACKNOWLEDGMENT ON THE PART OF THE IAF THAT IT MIGHT SOMEDAY SEEK TO FUNDAMENTALLY REORGANIZE THE COUNTRY'S POLITICAL APPARATUS. FARHAN'S UTOPIAN DREAM OF A "UNITED STATES OF ARABIA," NO MATTER HOW IT MIGHT RESONATE AMONG ISLAMISTS (AND THAT IS DEBATABLE), WILL NEVER FIND ITS WAY ONTO THE IAF'S PLATFORM. THE PARTY MAY EVEN BE UNDER PRESSURE FROM THE GOJ TO AVOID STEPS, SUCH AS ARTICULATING A DETAILED PLATFORM, WHICH COULD CAUSE A RUPTURE IN PARTY UNITY. A PARLIAMENTARY CONTACT TOLD POLOFF IN JANUARY OF HIS BELIEF THAT THE GOJ, AND SPECIFICALLY THE GENERAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTORATE, PREFERS TO KEEP THE IAF WHOLE IN ORDER TO KEEP AN EYE ON THE MORE RADICAL ELEMENTS OF THE PARTY'S MEMBERSHIP. ------- COMMENT ------- 10. (U) THE IAF'S PRAGMATIC STREAK HAS WIDENED MARKEDLY DURING ITS FOUR YEARS OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, AND ITS PLATFORM (OR LACK THEREOF) IS JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF HOW THE PARTY HAS LEARNED TO "WORK THE SYSTEM" TO ITS ADVANTAGE. AS LONG AS THE STATUS QUO IN TERMS OF DEMOCRATIC PROGRESS REMAINS IN PLACE, THE IAF WILL CONTINUE TO AVOID SAPPING ITS STRENGTH THROUGH A COSTLY INTERNAL DEBATE ON INTERPRETATION OF SHARIA LAW OR THE MECHANICS OF "ISLAMIC ECONOMICS." SHOULD JORDAN CONTINUE TO PROGRESS ALONG THE PATH TO DEMOCRACY, HOWEVER, THE PARTY WILL BE FORCED TO COME TO TERMS WITH THE WIDE IDEOLOGICAL SPECTRUM CURRENTLY REPRESENTED WITHIN IT. IN A WORST-CASE SCENARIO FOR THE PARTY, THE MOVEMENT WOULD BREAK UP INTO A NUMBER OF SMALLER PARTIES WITH OVERLAPPING BUT COMPETING VISIONS FOR AN ISLAMIC GOVERNMENT FOR JORDAN. THIS IS CURRENTLY THE SITUATION FOR JORDAN'S LEFTIST PARTIES, WHICH ARE DISPROPORTIONATELY WEAK DUE TO THEIR INABILITY TO OVERCOME INTERNECINE SQUABBLES. WHAT IS MORE LIKELY, GIVEN THE PARTY'S INCREASINGLY PRAGMATIC MODUS OPERANDI, IS THAT MEMBERS ON BOTH EDGES MAY DRIFT OFF, BUT THE CENTER WILL HOLD AS THE IAF ADOPTS A PLATFORM DESIGNED TO APPEAL TO JORDAN'S CONSERVATIVE, BUT SENSIBLE, MAJORITY. EGAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04