Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ROME2657 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ROME2657 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2003-06-12 10:30:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | EAID EAGR AORC PREF KUNR WFP UN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS ROME 002657 SIPDIS AIDAC FROM U.S. MISSION IN ROME SENSITIVE STATE FOR AS/PRM, PRM/P, EUR/WE, EUR/NE AND IO/EDA USAID FOR A/AID, AA/DCHA, AA/AFR, DCHA/FFP LANDIS, PPC/DP, PPC/DC USDA/FAS FOR CHAMBLISS/TILSWORTH/GAINOR GENEVA FOR RMA AND NKYLOH/USAID NAIROBI FOR REFCOORD KAMPALA FOR REFCOORD ISLAMABAD FOR REFCOORD BRUSSELS FOR USAID PLERNER AND PRM REP USUN FOR MLUTZ NSC FOR JDWORKEN OMB FOR TSTOLL E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: EAID, EAGR, AORC, PREF, KUNR, WFP, UN SUBJECT: SECOND REGULAR SESSION OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM EXECUTIVE BOARD, ROME, JUNE 2, 2003 SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED - PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. NOT SUITABLE FOR INTERNET POSTING. ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. (U) In an abbreviated Board session (one day), the Executive Board approved a country program for Pakistan, a school feeding intervention for Lesotho, and protracted relief and recovery operations for Kenya (Somali and Sudanese refugees), Uganda (refugees and internally displaced), and the Central African Republic. USDEL conducted a number of productive side meetings dealing with WFP's relationships with NGOs, UNHCR, and updates on WFP interventions on Pakistan, Uganda and parts of the Great Lakes region of Central Africa. End Summary. --------------------------------------------- ------ Pakistan Country Program and Lesotho school feeding --------------------------------------------- ------ 2. (U) The Board approved the 2004-2008 Pakistan country program with a five-year funding approval amounting to USD 77.9 million. USDEL lauded WFP's efforts to "focus and concentrate" its proposed efforts in 34 districts. Other USDEL comments were as follows: -Stronger capacity for monitoring poverty and the impact of anti-poverty programs needs to be developed; -WFP and its UN sister Agencies are encouraged to work closely with host government partners related to the honoring of stated commitments to protect women and minorities against legal, political and social discrimination; -USDEL strongly agrees with WFP's focus and attention to "promoting safe motherhood" in conjunction with WFP-assisted health programs, especially the emphasis on factors that affect low birth weight, timing of first births, inter-birth intervals, and maternal nutrition; -WFP is encouraged to expand its relationship with NGOs that need to be increasingly recognized as a useful and potentially significant part of Pakistan's development; -We are particularly concerned with beneficiaries, such as Afghan refugees, and ask that WFP focus on pipeline issues. 3. (SBU) In a side meeting with WFP Country Director German Valdivia, implementation of the WFP-UNHCR MOU (whereby WFP assumes responsibility for food deliveries directly to the refugee populations) was discussed as well as the problems resulting from a poorly resourced food pipeline. Valdivia indicated that WFP was dropping 27,500 refugees from the program as the tripartite process had decided (GOP, UNHCR and WFP) to close one camp and repatriate the refugees. (Comment: it was not clear whether this action in cutting off distribution may be de facto coercing the refugees to return to Afghanistan. Refcoord and PRM/ANE may wish to follow up with UNHCR. End comment.) 4. (U) On Lesotho, the Board approved a four year (2004- 2007) school feeding support to the GOL's Free Primary Education undertaking, with a total cost to WFP of USD 14.45 million. The project will assist 285,300 beneficiaries. USDEL noted that Lesotho remains dramatically food insecure and that the "drag" of AIDs on economic growth will further reduce the ability of the government to handle the rising social and healthcare costs. USDEL suggested that where appropriate WFP and its sister UN Agencies should consider revisiting previous methods of shoring up governments and populations in crisis -- including direct support to ministries, organizations and institutions that are losing the human resources and skilled professionals required to function effectively. Note: U.S. Ambassador in Maseru was reportedly thanked profusely by GOL officials for U.S. support of school feeding in Lesotho. End note. --------------------------------------------- ------------- Protracted relief and recovery (PRRO) operation - Kenya --------------------------------------------- ------------- 5. (SBU) WFP'S protracted relief and recovery operation (PRRO) for Kenya (10258.0) - Food assistance to Somali and Sudanese refugees, from October 2003 through September 2005, covering 230,358 beneficiaries, with a total cost to WFP of USD 57.46 million - was approved by the Board. WFP Country Director Tesema Negash commented that at present "about 15 percent of the food delivered to the camps is sold or bartered due to the inability of the other UN Agencies to supply non-food items." He also estimated that some 6 percent of the refugees were presently engaged in income generating activities but this was exceedingly difficult to document. Negash concluded that at present the camps were reasonably secure, given that the UN had supplied patrol vehicles to the local police. Germany stated that it was willing to consider placing experts into Kenya's "line ministries" to strengthen implementation efforts. --------------------------------------------- ------------- Protracted relief and recovery (PRRO) operation - Budget increase Uganda --------------------------------------------- ------------- 6. (U) A budget increase for PRRO Uganda 10121.0 - Targeted Food Assistance for Relief and Recovery of Refugees, Displaced Persons and Vulnerable Groups in Uganda, from April 2002 through March 2005, with a revised total cost to WFP of USD 178.9 million and an additional beneficiary caseload is 567,276, which brings the overall caseload to 1,596,691 persons - was approved by the Board. 7. (SBU) In a USDEL side meeting, Uganda Country Director Ken Davies gave an overview of WFP operations for 154,000 refugees, over 800,000 IDPs, and now an additional 535,000 drought victims and 6,000 especially vulnerable new Congolese refugees (out of 30,000 recent new arrivals). Of the 6,000 vulnerable new arrivals, most of them are women and children, and about half are expected to accept UNHCR's offer to relocate to a refugee camp. A contribution from the European Commission is expected to prevent a break in the PRRO pipeline before September. Furthermore, USAID/FFP plans to contribute to the PRRO through an approved call- forward this month. 8. (SBU) Davies said that resourcing a PRRO with such a diverse caseload has been especially difficult over the last year. Many donors diverted contributions to southern Africa and other crises while attacks by the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) and instability in the north exacerbated needs for IDPs in particular and resulted in increased acute malnutrition among IDP children under five years old. 9. (U) As for the refugees, Davies felt that despite some difficulties, the Self Reliance Strategy (SRS) had been successful in many respects and enabled WFP to remove 40,000 refugees from its caseload, as they received land and became self-sufficient. He added that the best land had already been distributed, and other refugees included in the SRS would need to rely on WFP to meet 10-40 percent of their food needs. As the largest buyer of food in Uganda, WFP has had a positive impact on small-scale agricultural production. In effect, it has supported small farmer cooperatives and greatly strengthened Uganda's commercial agricultural sector. WFP purchased USD 9 million of cereals and pulses locally in 2002 and plans to purchase USD 20 million this year. 10. (SBU) Regarding efforts to prevent exploitation, Davies described how WFP distributes food to clusters of households, many of which are headed by women, and relies upon traditional leaders within each cluster for the allocation to individual households. In refugee camps, WFP plans to move towards family-based distributions. Security conditions preclude advance announcement of distributions. WFP-UNHCR-NGO-GOU joint assessment missions are conducted in 66 settlements every six months. 11. (U) Davies was especially appreciative of PRM's recent cash contribution towards refugee needs in Uganda. He said that the refugees were an easy caseload for WFP to target there. Asked how the local purchase process worked and the timelines involved, he said that upon learning of a PRM contribution, he could immediately issue a tender and then sign a contract within two weeks. The contract would require delivery within four weeks, and the refugees would actually receive the food another two weeks after that. Therefore, the food will be distributed to the refugees no later than two months after the contribution is made. --------------------------------------------- ---------- Other USDEL side meetings - NGOs/UNHCR MOU/ICRC-related --------------------------------------------- ---------- 12. (SBU) USDEL met WFP Deputy Executive Director Shiela Sisulu and Deputy Director of Operations Francesco Strippoli regarding WFP's nascent task force to improve its relations with the NGO community. Sisulu commented that after WFP Executive Director Morris met in April with NGOs in Kansas City, he said he wanted to come out of WFP's October 2003 conference for NGOs "with his head still on." Sisulu comes from the NGO community, and she is making this initiative one of her immediate and top priorities. She acknowledged that WFP and NGOs view each other not only as partners but also as competitiors, and she asked for USDEL views. 13. (SBU) FFP Director Lauren Landis suggested that WFP focus not only on technical issues but also partnership issues with NGOs. WFP and the NGO community could work on a joint framework and ensure its implementation in the field. Strippoli agreed, admitting that country offices have little clear guidance from WFP Headquarters and considerable discretion in how they deal with NGO partners. As part of his efforts to rationalize WFP's guidance and instructions to the field, he has invited NGOs to a meeting in Rome on June 20 to further discuss WFP's draft strategic plan and report out on progress of the WFP-NGO working group. Special focus will be put on a revised risk management plan. For example, in some cases, NGO partners are reimbursed for warehouse costs on the basis of tonnage delivered, though deliveries may be disrupted for reasons beyond their control. Also, WFP's contracts with NGO partners are usually short-term - 3-6 months - due to the vulnerability of pipelines, but Strippoli would like to extend contracts through the period of the PRRO or EMOP, subject to availability of funding. 14. (U) USDEL/PRM commented that this would go part-way to addressing NGO concerns around implementation of the WFP- UNHCR MOU, but that WFP also needed to consider coordination at the field/camp level, especially since some of UNHCR's NGO partners provide other services to beneficiaries, aside from food distribution. 15. (SBU) While Sisulu and Strippoli are leading WFP's initiative to improve relations with NGOs, Morris has specifically indicated his desire to establish an NGO unit headed by a senior level coordinator by October 2003. Sisulu added that NGOs are also valuable partners in building local capacity in recipient countries. 16. (U) On WFP's relationships with UNHCR, USDEL met with Francesco Strippoli, his Interagency Branch Chief Zlatan Milisic, West Africa Regional Director Manuel Aranda da Silva, Uganda Country Director Ken Davies, and Pakistan Country Director German Valdivia. Each shared their views on the pilot programs under the UNHCR-WFP MOU. Sierra Leone, Uganda, and Pakistan represent three of the five pilot programs whereby UNHCR has transferred all responsibilities for refugee feeding, including end- distribution, to WFP. Zambia is expected to be the fourth pilot when the WFP PRRO is renewed and the costs incorporate WFP's new responsibilities. WFP has proposed Kenya as the fifth pilot to UNHCR. 17. (SBU) Overall, coordination between WFP and UNHCR was characterized very positively. WFP Deputy Executive Director and Director for Operations Jean-Jacques Graisse and UNHCR Assistant High Commissioner (AHC) Morjane and their staffs are in frequent contact on a range of issues. Strippoli again requested PRM support for two joint UNHCR- WFP field workshops to help ensure that this progress translates into training and coordination at the field level and that the respective headquarters get feedback from their country directors and staff. Strippoli said that the implementation of the MOU, particularly in Sierra Leone, has highlighted the need for WFP to re-vamp and improve its relations with NGO partners. 18. (SBU) WFP West Africa Regional Manager Aranda da Silva noted that there had been some rough spots in the implementation of the MOU in Sierra Leone. The West Africa Coastal PRRO did not adequately cover WFP's additional costs in taking over end-distribution, and WFP and UNHCR have used different cost structures and different NGO partners in the region. Both Strippoli and he said that WFP needs to take into account the impact of the transfer on camp management; some UNHCR implementing partners have had other critical responsibilities in the camps, and their presence in some cases became economically feasible only by doing food distribution. Furthermore, WFP wants to find a way to ease some of the pressure on NGO partners in the region by negotiating food distribution contracts for a longer period, rather than the standard 90-days. This effort is part of ED Morris' broader efforts to: (1) improve relations with NGOs, (2) shift risk from beneficiaries to WFP, and (3) strengthen coordination with other UN organizations. 19. (U) Implementation of the MOU seemed to go more smoothly in Pakistan and especially Uganda. Uganda Country Director Davies noted that WFP and UNHCR had the same four major implementing partners. The existing tripartite agreement with the GOU was also useful and provided transparency in costs and negotiating new contracts. WFP has also been able to realize some of the savings anticipated by the MOU and has negotiated lower rail and trucking costs. These savings have helped WFP offset increased security costs. 20. (SBU) Pakistan Country Director Valdivia said that the tripartite agreement and good relations with his UNHCR counterpart helped make the pilot a success thus far. He said that he had negotiated costs with UNHCR's NGO partners downwards, as their costs and international staff had been inflated post-9/11 and were now more in line with rates of other implementing partners. 21. (SBU) On ICRC, Strippoli has begun discussing the revision of their 1996 exchange of letters on cooperation, making these instruments more operational by replicating a number of measures refined in the WFP/UNHCR MOU. He said that WFP and ICRC have cooperated closely and effectively in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other emergencies. The two organizations already consult on dividing up food distributions, coverage of different regions and beneficiaries, hand-off of operations, and other activities. Strippoli wants to work more closely with ICRC on early warning, preparedness, and operational issues. (Note: Strippoli asked us to be discreet in discussing this initiative, in the event the U.S. wishes to sound out ICRC on its views. End note.) ------- Comment ------- 22. (SBU) WFP clearly has a lot on its plate. The next six months will deeply test its ability to cope with a myriad of crises and widespread (ambitious) management improvements. "The harvest truly is plenteous, but the laborers are few." Hall NNNN 2003ROME02657 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04