Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03KATHMANDU1060 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03KATHMANDU1060 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Kathmandu |
| Created: | 2003-06-09 09:56:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV NP Political Parties |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 001060 SIPDIS STATE FOR SA/INS LONDON FOR POL - GURNEY NSC FOR MILLARD SECDEF FOR OSD/ISA/NESA - TAYLOR E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/08/2013 TAGS: PGOV, NP, Political Parties SUBJECT: NEPALI CONGRESS SAID TO BE JOINING NEW GOVERNMENT REF: KATHMANDU 1011 Classified By: CDA ROBERT K. BOGGS. REASON: 1.5 (B,D). --------- SUMMARY --------- 1. (C) The Nepali Congress will likely join a Cabinet headed by new Prime Minister Surya Bahadur Thapa, according to a party Central Committee member, primarily because of Indian pressure. If the Nepali Congress joins, the Communist Party of Nepal - United Marxist Leninist (UML) will have to overcome its disgruntlement and join, or risk being left out in the cold, the source said. Nepali Congress Party President G.P. Koirala has begun tempering his public statements, noting his party might join the Thapa government if the new Prime Minister commits to reinstating Parliament. The Maoists, meanwhile, likely alarmed at the suggested rapprochement between the Palace and the mainstream parties, continue to try to discredit Thapa's appointment by claiming it was motivated by foreign pressure. End summary. ------------------------------ IF THE NEPALI CONGRESS JOINS, CAN THE UML BE FAR BEHIND? ------------------------------ 2. (U) As of COB on June 9, newly appointed Prime Minister Surya Bahadur Thapa had still not announced any members of the new Cabinet. The local weekend press gave prominent coverage to his efforts to coax such participation from the two largest parties, the Communist Party of Nepal - United Marxist Leninist (UML) and the Nepali Congress, as well as the splinter Nepali Congress (Democratic), led by former PM Sher Bahadur Deuba. The party leaders' public statements since Thapa's appointment on June 4 reiterate their disinclination to join his government, although Nepali Congress Party President G.P. Koirala told the press on June 7 that his party would "support" the new PM if he reinstates Parliament or sets a date for new elections. 3. (C) On June 7 Nepali Congress Central Committee member Ram Thapaliya told poloff that he believes that his party will join the Cabinet within a week or two. Thapaliya pointed to Indian support for Thapa and Indian pressure on Koirala to cooperate as the decisive factors. Koirala had given only nominal support to UML General Secretary Madhav Nepal as the consensus candidate for Prime Minister (Reftel) because Koirala was fairly certain that his long-time rival's candidacy, which was opposed by the Palace, the Maoists, and the Indians, never had a chance of succeeding, Thapaliya indicated. Koirala will be unable to withstand Indian pressure to join the Cabinet, Thapaliya predicted, but will likely exact some assurance that the new PM will reinstate Parliament in return. If the Nepali Congress joins the government, the UML, rather than being left out in the cold, will have to swallow its disgruntlement at not gaining the top post and join as well, he predicted. Although public posturing against Thapa's appointment will persist for "a week or two" for face-saving purposes, ultimately the PM will succeed in broadening his Cabinet, Thapaliya concluded. 4. (U) The public posturing seems likely to continue in the near term. The five parties already have announced the next phase of their "joint agitation" against "royal regression," including a protest at tax offices on June 10, youth rallies in assorted districts on June 13, and a nationwide women's rally on June 18. ------------------------------ MAOIST SHRILLNESS ON "FOREIGN HAND" INTENSIFIES ------------------------------ 5. (U) Maoist rhetoric decrying Thapa's appointment as the result of foreign--including US--interference continues unabated. The insurgents have offered to join the five-party "joint agitation" specifically to denounce "foreign intervention" in Nepal--a theme the five parties so far have not echoed. Speaking at a rally in the mid-western district of Palpa on June 7, Ram Bahadur Thapa (a.k.a. "Badal"), the Maoist military commander, said that his party is reviewing "how we can launch a movement together" with the five parties. On June 8 the Maoist-aligned All Nepal National Independent Student Union - Revolutionary (ANNISU-R) announced that it will support the indefinite strike against educational institutions, set to commence on June 15, called by seven other student unions aligned with the mainstream political parties. 6. (U) Also on June 8 the "National People's Agitation Committee" released a press statement blaming the "involvement of Americans, Indians and other imperialist powers" for obstructing progress in the peace talks and criticizing "the appointment of Surya Bahadur Thapa as the prime minister under the instruction of foreign forces." The Committee's press statement announced its decision to seek "joint agitation" to "create pressure from the people" to make "the regressive forces bow down." -------- COMMENT -------- 7. (C) Indian influence in Nepal's domestic politics in general and the current scenario in particular is taken as an article of faith among a wide range of our interlocutors. Indian influence is believed to be particularly strong in the Nepali Congress Party, which has benefited from covert Indian financial and political support for decades. Koirala's recent public statements indicating a softer stance--if the new PM agrees to reinstate Parliament or at least schedule elections--may well be the result of some of that influence being brought to bear. The Maoists may perceive that Thapa's appointment may array the mainstream political forces against them. Hence their increasingly strident rhetoricical attempts to discredit Thapa as a tool of "foreign intervention." There is no evidence thus far that their anti-American pitch is resonating, either with the political parties or the general public, who largely perceive (correctly, we believe) that Indian support was crucial to Thapa's appointment. BOGGS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04