Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ABUJA819 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ABUJA819 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Abuja |
| Created: | 2003-05-05 14:30:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | KPAO KDEM PREL NI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ABUJA 000819 SIPDIS STATE FOR AF/W AND AF/PD LAGOS FOR PAS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: KPAO, KDEM, PREL, NI SUBJECT: NIGERIAN MEDIA AND THE RECENT ELECTIONS 1. Summary. GON media officials have reacted angrily to what they view as instances of negative foreign press coverage of Nigeria recent elections and to comments by some international observer missions critical of government-owned media treatment of opposition candidates during the campaign period. Minister of Information Gana has threatened to expel foreign media operating in Nigeria if perceived anti- GON reporting continues. End summary. --------------------------------------------- -------- EU Monitoring Report, Foreign Journalists Under Fire --------------------------------------------- ------- 2. In its report following the April 19 elections, the EU monitoring mission noted a number of problems concerning the Nigerian media treatment and coverage of the electoral campaign. The EU report observed that, federal and state-owned media favored ruling party candidates and incumbents at the national and state levels. Equal access to the media, while officially the policy of the National Broadcasting Commission (GON media regulatory and oversight body), was not fully practiced by government-owned broadcasting organizations. The EU gave higher marks to the private media, who provided more airtime to opposition candidates. However, the EU added that funding disparities among the parties also translated into unequal airtime and ad space among the candidates; moreover, the private media were more reluctant to be critical of paying customers. Despite these lapses, the EU concluded that the Nigerian print media overall performance was positive in that election coverage was ample and broad, but also noted that reporting focused on personalities (vice issues). Finally, the EU applauded the Broadcasting Organization of Nigeria (BON) for its organization of election debates. (Note: None of the other observer missions included a critique of the Nigerian media in their reports. End Note.) --------------------------------------------- -- GON Refutes EU Charges; Slams Foreign Reporters --------------------------------------------- -- 3. Following an April 23 press conference, Minister of Information Jerry Gana railed against the foreign press and the EU report for contributing to a negative impression of the recent elections. Gana specifically criticized CNN, BBC, and the VOA for their reporting. He claimed that, ost of the correspondents came with a pre-determined idea of what the election should look like. They came to just find faults; they did not come to cover the elections. That is why they just closed their eyes and prayed that things should happen. Concerning the BBC and VOA, Gana stated, o country would allow the BBC or the VOA to do what it does to Nigeria especially on the Hausa Service. He added that the GON has made known its dissatisfaction to the respective corporate offices of the foreign media organizations with whom the GON is displeased. Gana noted that if such efforts fail, the GON ill have no option but expel them from our country. (Note: The BBC later invited Gana to its Abuja studios for an on-air interview but the Minister refused to appear. End Note.) 4. Gana faulted the EU monitoring report for its criticism of the government media, claiming that no editorial position was biased, manipulated or guided by anything but professionalism. He commended the Nigerian media for its performance throughout the election period. 5. Falling in line with the Minister of Information position, Voice of Nigeria Director General and Chairman of the BON Taiwo Allimi noted that reporting by foreign correspondents as shown that these foreign media have taken a stand against the Nigerian nation as a peaceful and a united country. Anywhere in the world, it is not the function of any free press to deliberately promote an assault on a sovereign nation and a people committed to ensuring the sustenance of democracy. Like Gana, Allimi singled out the BBC, VOA, and CNN for criticism and requested that they eep their politics in the interests of their home countries to themselves and be truly professional. Allimi was reportedly angered by what he considered to be unbalanced reporting bordering on inaccuracy and an insufficient understanding of the problems, constraints, and challenges before the Nigerian nation in carrying out the elections. 6. Similarly, the Director General of the NBC, Dr. Silas Babajiya Yisa, said the Nigerian media performed well during the elections and he congratulated the journalists for their professionalism. He also urged the foreign media to resist negative reporting on Nigeria. --------------------------------------------- --- The U.S. Mission View on Media and the Elections --------------------------------------------- --- 7. The Mission believes that the media provided adequate electoral coverage overall. However, as the EU stated, government-owned media did show favoritism. Although the private media was open to all, airtime and page space were disproportionately allotted to those who could pay. This campaign was short on substantive debate and the media is partially at fault. By and large, journalists did not attempt to veer their political coverage toward issues but instead were content to focus their reporting on personalities and the political horse-trading that has been the traditional fare of Nigerian politics. Thus, the media was competent in covering what was going on owever, the media was not very creative in trying to push the political debate to higher ground. 8. In our own monitoring of Nigerian Television Authority (NTA) coverage during the campaign period, we have seen regular reporting on PDP candidates and only spotty attention paid to the ANPP or others. Of all the government media, the Nigerian national wire service agency (NAN) did the most balanced job in providing a wide array of reporting covering all candidates. We also have monitored VOA and other Hausa language service reporting of the elections, and their reporting has been balanced and aired views of all sides. 9. When government reporters have tried to exercise independence to the detriment of the GON, they have come under fire from superiors, as happened on April 12 to an NTA Kaduna reporter. When he reported during a live national news broadcast that the state INEC Commissioner was consulting with Abuja before releasing the Gubernatorial results (the election law gives each state commissioner authority to announce results independently), the NTA anchor in Abuja reprimanded the reporter on the air not to question the procedure. We also note that where the private press has violated electoral rules regarding the media but the reporting favored Obasanjo, no sanction has been forthcoming. The independent newspaper, his Day, redicted an Obasanjo victory at the polls and published a post-election weekend exit poll in support of the President win prior to the INEC announcement. The questionable poll served to confirm previous non- existent polls published by a group believed to be affiliated with the Vice President office and used to bolster the impression of strong support for the PDP. ------- Comment ------- 10. The Nigerian government pique with foreign broadcasters is not new; Gana frequently criticizes the foreign press when it has reported bad news about Nigeria. The high stakes that occasion the elections have only made Gana and the GON more sensitive. The GON very much wanted the international impression of the Nigerian elections to be one of an uncritical endorsement of the process and the results. As this has not occurred and significant criticisms have been levied, it comes as no surprise that Gana and others would blame the foreign press and international monitors for being anti-Nigerian. JETER
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04