Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03AMMAN2528 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03AMMAN2528 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Amman |
| Created: | 2003-04-29 15:55:00 |
| Classification: | SECRET//NOFORN |
| Tags: | PGOV PREL MOPS PHUM IZ JO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 AMMAN 002528 SIPDIS NOFORN E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/29/2013 TAGS: PGOV, PREL, MOPS, PHUM, IZ, JO SUBJECT: IRAQ WAR HITS POPULAR CREDIBILITY OF KING ABDULLAH, U.S.; MANY LOOK FOR PROGRESS ON THE PEACE PROCESS Classified By: PolCouns Doug Silliman for reasons 1.5 (B) and (D) ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. (S) The perceived support that King Abdullah gave to the military campaign in Iraq -- which many Jordanians contrast with his statements that U.S. forces in Jordan performed merely a defensive role -- has led to a good bit of anti-government grumbling and, during the war, some open criticism of the King at anti-war protests. Jordanian popular mistrust of U.S. motives -- already significantly heightened over more than two years of the Intifada -- has soared in the wake of the war, with Jordanians expressing resentment and distrust of the U.S. While time and a rebound in economic growth may convince some Jordanians of the wisdom of King Abdullah's decision to support the Coalition, concrete movement on the peace process would much more quickly vindicate the King's decision, and help regain some U.S. credibility as well. END SUMMARY. --------------------------------------------- - KING'S REPUTATION TAKES SOME HITS DOMESTICALLY --------------------------------------------- - 2. (S) Several GOJ officials have expressed to us recently worry over the effect of the Iraq war on King Abdullah's domestic standing in Jordan. During the war, there were several demonstrations in the southern cities of Ma'an, Kerak, and Tafileh in which demonstrators carried signs and chanted slogans critical of the King and his perceived support for American military efforts against Iraq. Several anti-regime pamphlets appeared in those and other cities as well, prompting GOJ security forces to tighten their control over demonstrations and watch opposition groups more carefully. At the same time, there appears to have been a sharp drop in economic activity in the first quarter of 2003 as businesses and individuals put off investment and consumption decisions in the lead-up to war. 3. (S) Labor Minister Mozaheim Mohefen told Embassy FSN last week that, indeed, several protests in Karak and Tafileh during the war had contained "direct attacks" on King Abdullah, something that had traditionally been completely out of bounds. In response, Mohefen -- who has tribal origins in the south -- said he had been dispatched to the region to look into and deal with the anti-King sentiment. Mohefen said the GOJ had offered paper "jobs" to hundreds in the two governorates in an effort to defuse a worrisome situation. 4. (C) Several contacts outside the government have also reported to us that most average Jordanians believe that Jordan provided significant military support to the Coalition war in Iraq. Since GOJ public acknowledgment of U.S. troop deployment was limited to Patriot air defense batteries, many Jordanians have let their imaginations run wild and believe the King permitted the launching of a "secret invasion" of Iraq from Jordanian territory. Sketchy local press reports of sightings of khaki-clad foreigners and strange aircraft in the eastern desert have fueled this speculation -- and a good deal of hyperbole. According to several contacts, many Jordanians have contrasted this popular perception of Jordanian support to the military effort with statements by King Abdullah and other senior GOJ officials that Jordan did not support the war or permit combat operations to be conducted from Jordanian territory. The gap between the King's statements and the perceived reality, they argue, has damaged the King's credibility. 5. (S) Similarly, we have heard reports that there was a certain amount of grumbling in the Jordan Armed Forces (JAF) about Jordanian government support for U.S. military efforts in Iraq. Military contacts tell us that senior JAF officers held meetings with middle and low-ranking officers and troops in an effort to explain Jordan's national interest in supporting the U.S. Sources in the Jordanian JCS indicate that a few soldiers who opposed the war were detained. In the General Intelligence Directorate (GID), there was concern that Jordan's public association with the U.S. campaign would create problems GID would have to deal with -- both internally and from the Iraqi Intelligence Service. ---------------- AS DOES THE U.S. ---------------- 6. (S) U.S. credibility -- already low following two and a half years of the intifada -- has also taken a big hit. Jordanian popular concerns about the U.S. in the aftermath of the Iraq war are numerous: many worry that Syria will be the next country to come under U.S. attack. Others criticize ORHA Chief Jay Garner as a "Zionist" who will try to lead a new Iraqi government into pro-Israel policies. Nearly all see INC leader Ahmed Chalabi -- convicted of bank fraud in Jordan -- as a sinister tool of U.S. policy. Finally, most Jordanians believe -- fed by a long series of press stories making this assumption -- that the U.S. invaded Iraq merely to gain control over Iraq's oil resources and plans for a long-term occupation much like the Israeli presence in the West Bank and Gaza. The Jordanian press refers to both Israeli and U.S. forces as "occupation forces." The number of Jordanians who draw parallels between the U.S. presence in Iraq and the Israeli occupation of the West Bank/Gaza is strikingly high, and the U.S. presence in Iraq is already referred to popularly as an "occupation." ------- COMMENT ------- 7. (S) The damage to the King's standing is real, but is something from which he can recover given the right conditions. The benefits of the King's decision will be more evident if there is concrete progress on the Roadmap. The economic pressures and uncertainties may now also begin to ease, thanks to U.S. financial assistance and optimism about Jordan's economic future in a Saddam-free region. 8. (S) For the U.S., the political cost is in lost goodwill. Average Jordanians now ascribe to the U.S. the worst possible motive for any action. This very negative post-war popular impression of U.S. goals may begin to fade if things move quickly and well in Iraq. Even more important, however, will be U.S. moves to support the Roadmap and secure real progress toward the formation of a Palestinian state. GNEHM
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04