Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ANKARA2254 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ANKARA2254 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2003-04-08 07:32:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PBTS PHSA GR TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 002254 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/07/2013 TAGS: PREL, PBTS, PHSA, GR, TU SUBJECT: TURKS: RESOLUTION ON AEGEAN CLAIMS "NOT PRODUCTIVE" (U) Classified by Pol-Mil Counselor Stuart Brown. Reasons 1.5 (b) and (d). 1. (C) Summary. MFA's DDG for Maritime and Aviation Affairs, Vakur Gokdenizler, convoked pol-mil counselor to tell us that Congress' adoption of House Concurrent Resolution 87 on Aegean claims would be a "symbol of deteriorating U.S.-Turkish relations." He asked that the USG do what it could to avoid that, and foresaw that the resolution could further strain Turkey's relationship with the EU and Greece. Post undertook to make Turkey's displeasure with the resolution known to the Department. Text of the MFA's nonpaper on the subject is at para 5. End Summary. 2. (C) On April 7, MFA DDG for Maritime and Aviation Affairs Vakur Gokdenizler convoked pol-mil counselor to express concern regarding House Concurrent Resolution 87. The resolution concerns Aegean claims, mainly regarding the Imia/Kardak islets. Congressman Robert Andrews (D-NJ) is the sponsor, with Congressmen James McGovern (D-MA) and Michael Bilirakis (R-FL) cosponsoring. Gokdenizler said that the resolution, which Con. Andrews submitted to the House Committee on International Relations on March 11, was identical to one submitted in 2001. 3. (C) Mentioning that the GOT saw some "factual errors" in the resolution's text, Gokdenizler said that the MFA could "always get into the details of Aegean problems." At this time, however, he thought that there was a more important "political argument" for the US to avoid taking a stand on Aegean issues. Gokdenizler pointed out that Cyprus and Aegean issues are "going through a bottleneck in 2004" as the EU, Greece, and Cyprus attempt to link Turkish EU membership to solutions in both areas. Asking that the US not aggravate either issue, he noted that resolutions like this seem to come at "critical times." He urged us not to let this resolution become a "symbol of deteriorating Turkish-U.S. relations." Gokdenizler said the Turkish Embassy in Washington was also working the problem. 4. (C) Pol-mil counselor replied that Secretary Powell's April 2 visit had gone a long way toward re-strengthening bilateral ties, but that much work remained. He undertook to make the GOT's concern regarding the resolution known to the Department. 5. (U) Following is the text of the nonpaper Gokdenizler presented: Begin Text: -- Hon. Robert Andrew (D-NJ), Hon. McGovern (D-MA) and Hon. Bilirakis (R-FL) prepared a concurrent resolution on 11 March 2003, entitled "Expressing the Sense of Congress regarding Turkey's claims of sovereignty over islands and islets in the Aegean Sea." The draft resolution was referred to the Committee on International relations. -- This is not the first draft of its kind. The Committee received a similar one on 4 April 2001 but it did not take any action. -- The content of the draft is unacceptable. It contains one-sided, biased, prejudiced arguments. It jumps into hasty conclusions without any detailed legal basis about the status of the Aegean island, islets. -- It also contradicts the declared US position on the Aegean issues. The US has exerted important efforts in the past for the settlement of these issues and has displayed a balanced and evenhanded approach (madrid agreement, bilateral talks, etc.) The US therefore is well aware of the complex and interrelated nature of these issues than any other country. -- Despite these facts, the draft, if accepted, would mean a fundamental change in the US position which would have negative repercussions on the Turkish-US relations at this critical time. The timing of this renewed attempt therefore raises concerns about its real motive as well. -- The draft is also unhelpful and counter productive at a time when the Aegean issues are being discussed between Turkey and Greece in the form of exploratory contacts. -- Turkey hopes this draft, as in the past, will not be supported in the Committee for further action and the US Administration will spare no effort to this end. End Text. PEARSON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04