Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03AMMAN2007 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03AMMAN2007 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Amman |
| Created: | 2003-04-03 12:02:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PGOV ECON JO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 031202Z Apr 03
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 AMMAN 002007 SIPDIS SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV, ECON, JO SUBJECT: ZARQA BUSINESS COMMUNITY EYES PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS Sensitive but unclassified; please protect accordingly. ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. (sbu) Although they doubt elections will occur as scheduled on June 17, business leaders in Jordan's main industrial center believe a new parliament will redress the balance of political power in Jordan, giving areas outside Amman a greater voice in policy decisions. While a new parliament may complicate the economic reform process, giving elected representatives more say should serve to strengthen economic performance over time as the development of democratic institutions and formal, constructive channels for dissent gives investors greater confidence in the continuity of the application of rule of law in Jordan. End summary. ------------------------------------------ PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS - DOUBTS ON TIMING ------------------------------------------ 2. (sbu) In a March 19 meeting, Board members of the Zarqa Chamber of Industry welcomed the King's announcement that parliamentary elections would be held in June. They doubted, though, that elections would actually be held at that time. They noted that "no one is paying any attention" to the prospect of elections or campaigning by candidates, as most Jordanians have been riveted instead to the (then) prelude to war in Iraq and, to a lesser extent, ongoing Arab-Israeli violence. Indeed, they said most candidates for Zarqa-designated seats were not campaigning vigorously, calculating that the effort would be wasted on a target population that was seemingly uninterested and distracted by more immediate concerns. 3. (sbu) Mohammed Arsalan, Board Secretary and a candidate himself for the "Chechen" seat for Zarqa, echoed these remarks, noting he had put his own campaigning activity on hold for the time being. He said it had become increasingly difficult to solicit endorsements (including, he winked, from the Chamber of Industry), since key interest groups were unwilling to commit to a candidate without sizing up their options, something they had no time for as war loomed. Arsalan and the other Board members predicted elections would more likely be postponed until the fall, to allow for sufficient campaigning time between the shake-out of Iraq and election day. They agreed that such a delay would not cost the government any real political capital, since Jordanians have come to expect such things, and noted that such a delay might benefit more moderate candidates, who would be able to put time between the elections and any remaining raw emotions as a result of the war. ----------------------------- CONSTRUCTIVE ROLE ANTICIPATED ----------------------------- 4. (sbu) Once parliament is convened, though, the board was optimistic about its role in governing Jordan. They saw the parliament playing an important role as a sounding board for popular and regional concerns about government policies, which would - they hoped - prompt the government to be more responsive to constituent concerns. They were specifically NOT worried about the prospects of Islamist control of parliament, either directly through blocs of IAF-controlled seats, or indirectly through election of Islamic sympathizers to regional seats. They pointed out that, even at their height, Islamists held less than 20% of all seats in parliament. Indeed, some Board members thought seats in parliament might serve to moderate the Islamic opposition, giving them a voice in government that had lately been denied to them. 5. (sbu) More importantly, the Zarqa Chamber's leaders saw a new parliament as a vehicle to move some decision-making power on economic issues out of Amman. Board members have long complained (along with their colleagues in Irbid) that government policy is too Amman-centric, rarely taking into account the concerns of large communities outside the capital. They saw influence with MP's as a way to redress this imbalance, notably by educating and encouraging regional MP's to ask for amendments to new legislation - like the new Chambers of Industry Law - that negatively impacted the regions but was drafted by and for Amman business leaders. 6. (sbu) Arsalan noted that parliament gave interest groups a unique opportunity to influence policy. Most MP's, he said, are very weak on substantive issues - especially in the economy - but are willing and eager to accept advice and guidance from constituents. In the last parliament, for example, he said he fed his MP talking points by mobile phone on an economic issue while the issue was being debated on the floor - points the MP repeated verbatim during the debate. ---------------------------------- CHANGES TO TEMPORARY LAWS UNLIKELY ---------------------------------- 7. (sbu) The Board noted that, while they expected to have some entree on new legislation, their ability to effect changes to temporary laws already passed by the government during the parliament's absence was much more restricted. They did not expect a new parliament to attempt to amend any temporary laws brought forward by the government that touched on any of the King's priorities - including most economic reform legislation. 8. (sbu) In a similar vein, since the government controls the order in which temporary laws are brought to the parliament for formal ratification, the board thought it likely that the government would simply back-load any potentially controversial temporary laws until they had time to discuss these laws informally with MP's or until future elections brought more like-minded MP's to the fore. With the raft of temporary laws passed during parliament's absence, the Board said it would in any case be years before any potentially contentious temporary laws made it to the floor. ------- COMMENT ------- 9. (sbu) The Zarqa Chamber is one of Jordan's more forward-looking business bodies and is broadly supportive of the King's economic agenda. Most members support QIZ activity and the FTA and actively participate in trade relation-building events with the Embassy and Jordan's AmCham. They pride themselves on separating business from politics, unlike their sister Chamber in Amman, they claim. They are, however, ritually concerned about center-periphery relations both in politics and economics (despite most of them maintaining residences in Amman), as they have benefited greatly from economic reform policies that have put relatively more economic control into the hands of the private sector - and hence of the regions. 10. (sbu) The Chamber's thoughts on the potentially constructive role for a new parliament is an interesting counterpoint to those who believe parliament will create more opportunities for vested interests to block or slow down economic reforms. We agree with the assessment that a new parliament is unlikely to try to reverse progress made under temporary laws over the past three years. However, bringing new legislation before parliament will provide an excellent opportunity for a host of vested interest groups - many with "old-economy" ties - to use parliamentary procedures to slow the pace of reform, in particular by distorting individual reform initiatives. 11. (sbu) Even a flawed economic reform process, though, would likely serve to legitimize the parliament and Jordan's democratization efforts. A meaningful democratic process would, in turn, enhance investor confidence in the application of the rule of law in Jordan, and thus provide a long-term boost to the country's economic process. It would also force MP's to take responsibility for economic decisions instead of criticizing from the sidelines, thereby moderating some of the anti-government rhetoric often displayed by Islamists and other opposition groups. GNEHM
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04