Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03HARARE653 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03HARARE653 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Harare |
| Created: | 2003-04-01 14:43:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | EAGR ECON EINV ETRD ZI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 011443Z Apr 03
UNCLAS HARARE 000653 SIPDIS SENSITIVE STATE FOR AF/S NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR JFRAZER USDOC FOR 2037 DIEMOND PASS USTR ROSA WHITAKER TREASURY FOR ED BARBER AND C WILKINSON STATE PASS USAID FOR MARJORIE COPSON E. O. 12958: N/A TAGS: EAGR, ECON, EINV, ETRD, ZI SUBJECT: GOZ Ups Grain Subsidy Ref: a) Harare 152 b) Harare 489 1. (U) Summary: The GOZ has increased nearly 4-fold the amount it pays growers for maize. By leaving the crop's low consumer price intact, however, the cash-starved GOZ assumes a weighty subsidy. End summary. 2. (U) The GOZ also announced an approximate doubling of the producer price for wheat. Through its Grain Marketing Board (GMB), the GOZ plays a middleman role between growers and millers/retailers. At present prices, the GOZ will subsidize 93 percent of the maize cost and 81 percent of the wheat cost. Candid Assessment from Within GOZ --------------------------------- 3. (SBU) A high-level GOZ official told DCM he was scheduled to go to State House and attempt to convince the powers-that-be that it is also necessary to raise the price of maize to consumers. He said past arguments for a price hike had been rebuffed on grounds that it would drive the population toward the opposition. The official argued that shortages and corruption spawned by artificially-low prices does the same, minus any palliative effect. He concludes that the point may be moot anyway: The new producer price is still far enough below prevailing market prices that he doubts the GMB will capture much of this year's harvest. Comment ------- 4. (U) As with fuel (ref a) and energy (ref b), the GOZ's intervention in grain markets amid a free-falling economy has created a no-win predicament. At artificially low prices, producers/suppliers have no incentive to sell fuel, energy and food. If prices rise to market equilibrium, however, most Zimbabweans -- who now take home less than US$ 20/month -- cannot afford food and transport. Through the new subsidy, the GOZ seeks to avert shortages and mollify consumers (i.e., shift the supply-curve outward to intersect with demand at lower price levels). But it has simply swapped one macroeconomic distortion (low producer prices) for another (an unaffordable subsidy), another futile stunt to mask Zimbabwe's dizzying impoverishment. Sullivan
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04