Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03COLOMBO513 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03COLOMBO513 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Colombo |
| Created: | 2003-03-25 13:13:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV PTER PHUM PINS CE NO JA CH LTTE |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 COLOMBO 000513 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR SA, SA/INS, S/CT; NSC FOR E. MILLARD LONDON FOR POL/RIEDEL E.O. 12958: DECL: 3-26-13 TAGS: PGOV, PTER, PHUM, PINS, CE, NO, JA, CH, LTTE - Peace Process SUBJECT: Peace process update: More re sinking of Chinese fishing boat; Tamil leader takes on the LTTE Refs: (A) FBIS Reston Va DTG 251820Z Mar 03 - (B) FBIS Reston Va DTG 251313Z Mar 03 - (C) Colombo 485 - (D) Colombo 381 - (E) Colombo 261 (U) Classified by Lewis Amselem, Deputy Chief of Mission. Reasons 1.5 (b, d) 1. (C) This update of Sri Lanka's peace process reviews the following: >> Sinking of Chinese fishing boat still under investigation, but Tigers look more-and-more like the culprits >> In brave but dangerous move, Tamil leader hits out at the Tigers >> Unconfirmed reports that the Tigers are killing opponents >> Alliance between major Opposition grouping and radical JVP close, but no agreement yet on how to handle peace process >> Latest poll indicates strong public support for the peace process =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= More on Sinking of Chinese Boat =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2. (SBU) The Sri Lankan government and the peace process monitors continue to investigate the March 20 attack on a Chinese fishing trawler off the northeastern coast of Sri Lanka. (Note: Seventeen crewmen, Chinese and Sri Lankan, are believed to have died in the incident. Ref C reviews the incident in additional detail.) The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) organization has been accused of perpetrating the attack, although the group continues to deny any involvement. The Sri Lankan government has stated that it has now recovered the bodies of seven victims, and is continuing its search operations for the rest who are missing and presumed dead. In addition, the GSL has released a press statement condemning the "unprovoked" attack (without mentioning the LTTE) (Ref B). For its part, China -- per Ref A statement by the Chinese MFA -- continues to demand a full-and-complete investigation into the incident. 3. (C) In the meantime, the Norwegian-run Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission (SLMM) expects to present its findings re the incident to the GSL and LTTE on March 28. A public statement by the SLMM will be released two or three days later. When pressed, SLMM Spokesman Teitor Torkelson told us that the monitors could not confirm that the LTTE sunk the boat. That said, based on the totality of the evidence, the SLMM strongly believes the LTTE is responsible. He expects that the SLMM's forthcoming press release will implicate the LTTE without directly assigning blame. 4. (C) COMMENT: The sinking of the vessel remains mysterious. All indications are that the LTTE did indeed attack and sink the fishing trawler, but there is no apparent rationale for the group doing so. The LTTE has no bone to pick with China, and the group has not attacked fishing boats, in general, in the past. As reported in Ref C, however, the Sea Tigers (the LTTE's "navy") appear to be on a hair trigger following recent confrontations with the Sri Lankan navy and it is possible they are lashing out. END COMMENT. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Tamil Leader Hits Out at LTTE =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 5. (C) In a courageous, but potentially dangerous move, senior Tamil leader V. Anandasangaree has publicly hit out at the LTTE. Anandasangaree, head of the Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF) and a senior MP, stated publicly on March 23 that he does not accept the LTTE's claim to be "the sole representative of the Tamil people." (Note: Anandasangaree has often voiced similar opinions about the LTTE to Mission personnel during private conversations in the past, but this is the first time he has opened up in public.) He went on to complain that the LTTE would not permit the TULF to commemorate the life and works of its former leader, A. Amirthalingam, who was assassinated by the LTTE in July 1989 in Colombo. 6. (C) In addition to Anandasangaree, a second TULF MP from Jaffna, N. Raviraj, appears to be trying to distance himself from the LTTE. Referring to a recent announcement that there might be local elections in the north and east (Ref A), Raviraj announced publicly on March 24 that he might run independently of the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) (apparently for the job of mayor of Jaffna, a post which he formerly held). (Note: The TNA is composed of four generally pro-LTTE Tamil parties, including the TULF, which is its major constituent element. Most members of the TNA are pro- LTTE.) (Note: The Ambassador is scheduled to meet with Raviraj next week and will get his take on the situation at that time.) 7. (C) COMMENT: Anandasangaree's decision to criticize the LTTE in public is a brave one. His comments may have been prompted by the LTTE's recent decision not to permit the reopening of Jaffna's Library (Ref E). This decision upset Ananadasangaree and other Tamils, who had worked long-and-hard to reopen the cultural landmark. In any case, Anandasangaree's decision to go public is a potentially dangerous one, as highlighted by what happened to Amirthalingam (see above) and what may be happening to other opponents of the LTTE (see below). END COMMENT. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= LTTE Reportedly Kills Opponents =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 8. (SBU) In other news regarding the LTTE and the Tamil community-at-large, the past week has seen multiple unconfirmed reports of the LTTE assassinating, intimidating, and abducting mainly Tamil opponents. On March 18, for example, a former soldier in the Sri Lankan army of Tamil ethnicity was killed in Mount Lavinia, a city located just south of Colombo. Despite reports claiming that the killing was carried out by the LTTE (which, as usual, denies involvement), there has been no confirmation of who perpetrated the killing. In the meantime, additional allegations involving the LTTE have recently surfaced and include: -- The LTTE allegedly assassinating numerous government intelligence sources during the past year; -- A recent attempt to deliver a letter bomb to a military informant, which exploded and injured several people (but not the intended victim); -- Reported use of intimidation and violence to prevent civilians from reporting LTTE-related incidents to the SLMM; and, -- Continued abduction/disappearances of LTTE opponents. 9. (C) COMMENT: Mission is looking into this uptick in reports of egregious human rights violations by the LTTE, especially the reports that they are killing opponents. (Note: FYI. Anandasangaree, in a recent conversation with the Ambassador, asserted that the LTTE was involved in many killings of Tamil opponents.) Many of the reports seem murky, however, and are difficult to confirm. It is also not clear whether the government is investigating the cases fully. (Note: Some suspect that the government is not pressing the cases because it feels that to do so might jeopardize the peace process, or perhaps because Tamil witnesses do not want to cooperate.) END COMMENT. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- PA and JVP near Alliance =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 10. (C) The People's Alliance (PA), the main Opposition grouping, and the radical Janantha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) party continue their efforts to form an alliance. As reported previously (see Ref D), the parties are believed close to sealing a deal. According to contacts, however, one of the key issues dividing the two parties is how to deal with the peace process. Compared with the PA, the JVP is much, much more anti- peace process and does not want to endorse the PA plan for constitutional devolution sent to Parliament by President Kumaratunga, the PA leader, in August 2000. (Note: The plan was not approved by Parliament at that time.) 11. (C) COMMENT: It is understandable that the historical differences between the two parties re the peace process may create some difficulty in coming to a compromise. The JVP has vociferously opposed any agreement that devolves any power to the north and east. The PA, on the other hand, has had a moderate approach to the peace process for quite some time (although some PA elements have taken a more critical stance of late). While overcoming differences may be difficult, indications are that the JVP and PA will find a way to reach a compromise and forge an alliance in the coming days, weeks, or months. END COMMENT. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Public Supports Peace Process =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 12. (C) The latest poll figures continue to show overwhelming support for the peace process. The latest edition of a poll by a well-respected local NGO (the Center for Policy Alternatives) indicates that 83.7 percent of the population supports the peace process. Since the signing of the ceasefire agreement in February 2002, support for the process has remained relatively stable at between about 83 and 87 percent. Norwegian facilitation of the talks also maintains a plurality of support by a substantial margin (with neutral or unknown response receiving substantial numbers). The SLMM, however, is seen as being impartial and effective by only a small plurality of the populace. According to the poll's results, the Tamil-speaking community is much more pro-SLMM than the majority Sinhalese community. 13. (C) COMMENT: Despite recent, strident criticism from some in the south aimed at the peace process, the latest poll confirms our sense that the public-at-large continues to support the ceasefire and discussions with the LTTE. The United National Party (UNP) government, which has problems in such areas as the economy, is clearly benefiting from this support, as it sees its popular standing buoyed by its management of peace- related issues. END COMMENT. 14. (U) Minimize considered. WILLS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04