Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ANKARA1305 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ANKARA1305 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2003-02-27 14:53:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ECON PREL TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 001305 SIPDIS SENSITIVE STATE FOR E, P, EUR AND EB TREASURY FOR U/S TAYLOR E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, PREL, TU SUBJECT: TURKEY'S ECONOMY: BUDGET COULD BE PASSED "IN TWO WEEKS;" CONCERN WITH FOREIGN BANK LINES Sensitive but unclassified. Not for internet distribution. 1. (SBU) Summary: The Turkish Ministry of Finance's top budget expert told us the process of enacting the 2003 budget could take as little as two weeks. But the Government is delaying submission of the budget to parliament, per this expert, because it has not agreed with the IMF over measures needed to reach the 6.5 percent of GNP primary budget surplus. This expert confirmed that the IMF position still shows a 1.5 percent of GNP or $3 billion shortfall towards this primary surplus target. By not moving quickly to pass a 2003 budget which the IMF can support, the GOT risks putting itself in a vulnerable situation vis a vis the markets. One foreign bank told us of indications that one of the major European bank lenders to Turkish banks is already limiting or pulling its lines. End Summary. Budget Process "A Matter of Two Weeks" ------------------------------------- 2. (SBU) Turkey's 2003 budget could be enacted into law in as little as two weeks, according to Turkish Finance Ministry Deputy DG for the budget Ahmet Kesik. Kesik outlined the four-step process for us: -- The "Higher Planning Council" (a subset of Cabinet ministers and econ agency heads) must meet and approve the budget law (status: done); -- The full Cabinet must approve and submit the budget to parliament (status: Cabinet has discussed but not yet submitted it to parliament.) -- The Parliament's Budget and Planning Commission approves the budget, and prepares a report recommending its passage by the full parliament (Kesik said this could take as little as two days); -- The full parliament votes on the budget article-by-article (the 2003 budget law has about 50 articles, but the two political parties in parliament could agree to limit debate.) 3. (SBU) Kesik added that the reason the full Cabinet has not yet approved the budget was the impasse with the IMF. He confirmed that the IMF sees the draft budgetary measures they would accept as yielding a 5.0 percent of GNP primary surplus (the IMF cannot accept the GOT's proposed delay of the "Direct Income Support" for farmers, worth about 0.5 percent of GNP), whereas the GOT sees a 6.5 percent primary surplus in its existing draft. (The 1.5 percent of GNP gap is about $ 3 billion). 4. (SBU) Comment: The current interim budget expires March 31. The GOT could in theory pass another interim, and continue negotiating with the IMF over the full year primary surplus measures, but then it risks the following dangerous scenario: a conflict with Iraq, no budget, no IMF agreement and an unhappy bond market. On the IMF front, resrep told us there is still no progress on closing the 1.5 percent of GNP primary surplus gap. In fact, MinFin Unakitan, in a meeting this week, raised with IMF staff the possibility of new VAT tax cuts for certain sectors (milk products and funeral services.) IMF staff believes the GOT still hopes to move the USG off our conditionality language, and thus obviate the need to take difficult budget measures required by the IMF. End Comment. An Initial Sign of Trouble with Foreign Bank Confidence --------------------------------------------- ---------- 5. (SBU) Barclays Bank Turkey managers Matt Vogel and Burak Ince told us 2/27 that they see signs, and are hearing rumors, that one of the major European bank lenders to Turkish banks has pulled or at least limited credit lines to Turkish banks. The sign is that over past two days several Turkish banks approached Barclays seeking short-term "repo" (i.e., Turkish T-bill-backed) loans. Barclays is not a major lender to Turkish banks and the sudden, large-scale demand for these repo deals indicates that one of the three major European lenders (currently Dresdner, Credit Agricole and West LB) has stopped lending. 6. (SBU) Comment: Turkish banks may want to continue to roll-over their T-bill lending to the GOT, even in the absence of a U.S. package or an IMF agreement, but their ability to do so has funding constraints, and foreign bank credit lines are an important element in these constraints. PEARSON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04