Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03SANAA374 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03SANAA374 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Sanaa |
| Created: | 2003-02-26 13:17:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PHUM YM HUMAN RIGHTS |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SANAA 000374 SIPDIS DRL FOR CRANER; DEPT FOR NEA-ARP E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/26/2013 TAGS: PHUM, YM, HUMAN RIGHTS SUBJECT: 2002 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT FOR YEMEN MUST BE CREDIBLE Classified By: Ambassador Edmund J. Hull for Reasons 1.5 (b,d) 1. (C) Summary: The Human Rights Report is a vital tool in Post's efforts to improve human rights in Yemen, and its credibility is central to that effort. The draft 2002 Human Rights Report for Yemen is in danger of a damaging lack of credibility unless the report reflects the facts more accurately. End Summary. 2. (C) The Human Rights Report (HRR) is taken seriously in Yemen, both by the government and the public. In the last couple of years, it was translated and published in several newspapers in its entirety. Several conferences were held, and the ROYG published a point-by-point response to the 2001 report in both Arabic and English newspapers. 3. (C) Post's experience is that the HRR is the best tool available in encouraging improvements in Yemen's human rights. Progress was made in several areas over the last few years, at least in part because of the HRR and Post's engagement on the issue. For example, Post has witnessed a marked improvement in the treatment of detainees and prisoners by the Political Security Organization (PSO), in part due to highlighting abuse in past HRRs and training their forces in human rights during counter-terrorism training. Citizens' ability to change their government has also improved over the last few years, with the establishment of local government and more widespread competition between political parties. 4. (C) Because of the importance of the HRR tool in pressing the ROYG for changes in its human rights practices, the HRR must be strongly credible or the chance for change is diminished. There are several areas of the draft 2002 report where credibility is in danger, including the following: -- Terrorist suspects detained by the ROYG at U.S. government request: Post suggests an acknowledgment be made by using phrasing that alludes to "partners in the war on terrorism." -- Prosecution of the USS Cole detainees was delayed at U.S. government request to allow time for investigation: Post suggests language that alludes to "international law enforcement partners" in explaining why detainees were held beyond normal time limits. -- Yemeni security forces did not kill persons this year in an unlawful or extrajudicial manner. All instances of death by security forces in the draft report came about during legitimate law enforcement activities pursuing terrorists, including the November 3 attack on al-Qaeda. Post suggests that the language "Members of the security forces killed a number of persons during the year" be changed to "There were no reports of arbitrary or unlawful deprivation of life committed by the Government or its agents." 5. (C) In President Bush's State of the Union address, the predator attack on November 3 against al-Qaeda was highlighted as a significant success in the war on terror. It is inconsistent that a report from the Department of State would indicate that the same killing is extrajudicial or unlawful. HULL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04