Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ANKARA1267 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ANKARA1267 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2003-02-26 12:42:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV ECON ETRD TU IQ |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ANKARA 001267 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/25/2013 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, ECON, ETRD, TU, IQ SUBJECT: IRAQ: CODEL HEFLEY PRESSES FOR TURKISH SUPPORT (U) CLASSIFIED BY: AMBASSADOR W.R. PEARSON FOR REASONS 1.5(B) AND (D). 1. (C) SUMMARY: In February 20-21 meetings, Codel Hefley politely but aggressively pressed Turkey's leadership to permit U.S. forces to use Turkey as a potential base for operations. While recognizing the political difficulties Turkey's elected politicians face, the Codel called upon them to help enforce UNSCR 1441. From the interlocutors that matter, particularly AK Party Chairman Erdogan and PM Gul, the Codel heard assurances that Turkey would stand by its long relationship with the United States when making the decision whether to allow U.S. troops to deploy on Turkish soil. The members elicited less support from President Sezer and FM Yakis. END SUMMARY. 2. (C) COMMENT: Codel Hefley came to Ankara at a crucial juncture in our efforts to convince the Turks of the need for U.S. troops in SE Turkey. The members' consistent, firm, and bipartisan message rounded out a broad series of political and military contacts we have had with the GOT over the last weeks. In the context of our asking the AK Party's relatively new government to make an unpopular choice, face-to-face contact between elected officials helped reinforce to the GOT that the USG understands the dilemma Parliament faces. The Codel, which coordinated its statements well with our ongoing engagement of the GOT on Iraq, left its interlocutors in no doubt of America's determination to disarm Saddam. END COMMENT. 3. (U) Codel Hefley, which had visited Brussels and Paris as the U.S. delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (NPA), came to Ankara at the invitation of the Turkish NPA delegation. The U.S. delegation was headed by Congressman Joel Hefley, who was accompanied by Congressmen John Tanner, Paul Gillmor, Nick Lampson, Scott McInnis, and Dennis Moore. The Codel met with President Sezer, PM Gul, AK Party Chairman Erdogan, FM Yakis, Turkish Grand National Assembly (TGNA) Chairman Arinc, and Foreign Ministry U/S Ziyal. ---------------------- Codel Hefley's Message ---------------------- 4. (C) Codel Hefley presented a bipartisan and consistent appeal to Turkey for its assistance against Iraq. The members emphasized the USG's preference for Saddam's peaceful disarmament. Nonetheless, the experience of the last twelve years argued against his choosing to disarm voluntarily. As Congressmen Hefley and Tanner pointed out to their interlocutors, Saddam had already proven that he would use weapons of mass destruction against his neighbors, as well as against his own people. Turkey, as a "frontline" state, is among those Saddam threatens the most. ------------------------------------- Erdogan & Gul: Political Difficulties ------------------------------------- 5. (C) In separate meetings, PM Gul and AK Party Chairman Erdogan (who is likely to become PM in March) cited the Turkish public's "90 percent opposition to war." Erdogan said that the public remains unconvinced of the case against Saddam. Foremost in Turkish public opinion is the memory of losses incurred during the course of the Gulf War, as well as during the ongoing embargo, which hit Turkey's poor southeast the hardest. Erdogan said the US economic package is critical in winning public and parliamentary support for a U.S. deployment. Gul, ideally, said he would like a second UNSCR. At the Codel's prompting, however, he admitted that Saddam, having long defied many resolutions, would be unlikely to comply with yet another. To Gul, the value of another resolution would be in "establishing the broadest coalition possible" against Saddam's regime. Both Gul and Erdogan averred that Turkey's strategic partnership with the United States is Turkey's most vital relationship. Gul said it is the "best thing Turkey has"; Erdogan said that Turkey will not allow Iraq to overshadow the bilateral alliance. ---------------- MOU Negotiations ---------------- 6. (C) FM Yakis made it clear that Turkey does not wish to "make" the United States abandon what he called the "northern option." He recognized that if there is a war in Iraq, it is in Turkey's interest to have U.S. forces working from Turkish soil. Foreign Ministry U/S Ziyal said that Turkey would "make the right decision" and that the AK Party government would do everything in its power to meet the USG's request. Echoing statements from the PM and Erdogan, he said that Turkey's vital interests require that the GOT stand up against public opinion in regard to Iraq. If negotiations seem difficult, he added, it is because the GOT takes its commitments seriously and fully intends to carry them out. 7. (C) Both Yakis and Ziyal made appeals for U.S. flexibility on the political, military and, particularly, on the economic documents. Yakis cautioned that the current Parliament is untested. The better the package the United States presents, the more likely it is that Parliament will allow U.S. troops into the country. The earlier legislation that approved the site surveys and site preparation was not as sensitive as the proposed troop deployment, which will open Turkish territory for the United States to launch a war against a neighbor. The current Parliament is more open to debate than its predecessors; it is in the United State's interest to give the GOT everything it can to make it comfortable with making a hard decision to go against public opinion. Ziyal underlined the fragility of Turkey's economy even without the threat of war, while Yakis warned that a bankrupt Turkey would be unable to effectively support the United States. He argued for U.S. economic support regardless of Parliament's approval for a U.S. troop deployment. --------------- Saddam and Iraq --------------- 8. (C) Ziyal dwelled on the future of Iraq. He doubted that Saddam is in full "grasp of his faculties" and seems to get "crazier and crazier" over time. Tariq Aziz showed the strain on the regime during his recent visit to Istanbul, when he was at "great unease." Turkey's preference is for peaceful evolution in Iraq rather than revolution. Ziyal said he hoped for a change of attitude in Baghdad and said that the Turkey has worked hard to impress the need for change on the Iraqis. Iraq's future is of immediate interest to Turkey due both to proximity and to "relatives across the border". Ziyal predicted that though the United States could quickly invade Iraq, the military aspect of changing Iraq is just the "tip of the iceberg." We should be ready for a long-term commitment -- rebuilding Iraq will not be like rebuilding Japan. Iraq is an "armed society" with a "culture of violence." The first order of business will be to contain violence -- Turkey understands that a northern front will contribute to containing instability. Turkey is even more willing to cooperate because issues in Iraq may look different to Turkey than from the USG's cross-Altantic perspective. This is especially the case in regard to the vital issue of Iraq's territorial integrity. --------------------------------------------- ------ Sezer Repeats His Call for a Second UNSC Resolution --------------------------------------------- ------ 9. (C) President Sezer sounded a different note than any other interlocutor. He emphasized his interpretation that Article 92 of the Turkish Constitution requires "international legitimacy" for foreign troops to be based in Turkey. The president claimed that the UNSC is the only body that can confer it and that UNSCR 1441 is insufficient. In his view, only a second UNSCR would allow the GOT to clear what he referred to as a "constitutional hurdle." Staking out a tougher position than the Codel heard elsewhere, he said Turkey is already helping the United States more than Turkey had helped during the Gulf War, relative to the lack of a second resolution authorizing force. Absent a second resolution, he predicted that the opposition party (the Republican People's Party) would contest the approval of a U.S. deployment in the Constitutional Court. -------------------------- The Bilateral Relationship -------------------------- 10. (C) All parties praised the Turkish-U.S. strategic partnership. Other than Iraq, four issues came up in two venues: -- President Sezer expressed appreciation for an October 16, 2002, Congressional resolution that thanked Turkey for its support in the war against terror. He cited it as an important, symbolic step in improving relations. Sezer also applauded the creation of a Turkey caucus in the 107th Congress. He hoped that it would be an active grouping in the 108th. -- Urging action, Sezer complained that the GOT has been waiting for more than one year for the United States to finalize arrangements for the establishment of Qualified Industrial Zones in Turkey. -- U/S Ziyal asked the Codel for a "better record from Congress." Just as the USG is now asking Turkey to subordinate some of its interests to America's appeal for help against Iraq, he asked that Congress work to keep the United State's national interest above "ethnic or local considerations." Ziyal asked for a deeper understanding of Turkey's sensitivity toward Armenian genocide resolutions and repeated Turkey's position that the issue is one best left to historians. -- Ziyal asked that the USG and, specifically, Congress try to take a "balanced" approach on Cyprus. He worried that the USG tends to hear only one side of the issue because Turkey lacks a U.S.-based ethnic lobby to match the strength of the Greek-American community. 11. (U) Codel Hefley did not clear this cable. PEARSON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04