Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ABUDHABI723 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ABUDHABI723 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Abu Dhabi |
| Created: | 2003-02-09 13:12:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | ETTC PREL PGOV EWWT MOPS IZ TC |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
null
Diana T Fritz 06/05/2007 10:35:13 AM From DB/Inbox: Search Results
Cable
Text:
CONFIDENTIAL
SIPDIS
TELEGRAM February 09, 2003
To: No Action Addressee
Action: Unknown
From: AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI (ABU DHABI 723 - UNKNOWN)
TAGS: ETTC, PREL, PGOV, EWWT, MOPS
Captions: None
Subject: UAEG AND IRAQ FERRY OPERATOR SUBMIT LETTERS TO
SANCTIONS COMMITTEE
Ref: None
_________________________________________________________________
C O N F I D E N T I A L ABU DHABI 00723
SIPDIS
CXABU:
ACTION: POL
INFO: RSO AMB DCM P/M ECON
DISSEMINATION: POL
CHARGE: PROG
APPROVED: CDA:TEWILLIAMS
DRAFTED: CDA:TEWILLIAMS
CLEARED: CGD:RGOLSON, POL:STWILLIAMS, DAO:MWEAVER
VZCZCADI811
OO RUEHC RHRMDAB RUCNRAQ RUEKJCS RUENAAA RHEHNSC
RUEKJCS RUCNDT RUCXONI RUCJACC RUHPFTA RHRMABI RUWDXEU RUEHDE
DE RUEHAD #0723 0401312
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 091312Z FEB 03
FM AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8357
INFO RHRMDAB/COMUSNAVCENT //N2/N3/N31CG// IMMEDIATE
RUCNRAQ/IRAQ COLLECTIVE
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC//J5//
RUENAAA/CNO WASHINGTON DC//N3/N5//
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1133
RUCXONI/ONI WASHINGTON DC
RUCJACC/USCINCCENT MACDILL AFB FL
RUHPFTA/CTF FIVE ZERO
RHRMABI/MARLO BAHRAIN
RUWDXEU/COMDESRON SEVEN
RUEHDE/AMCONSUL DUBAI 2788
C O N F I D E N T I A L ABU DHABI 000723 SIPDIS STATE FOR NEA/ARP, NEA/NGA, IO/UNP AND PM/ISO E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/09/07 TAGS: ETTC, PREL, PGOV, EWWT, MOPS, IZ, TC SUBJECT: UAEG and Iraq ferry operator submit letters to Sanctions Committee REF: DUBAI 300 1.(U) Classified by Charge Thomas E. Williams for reasons 1.5 (B) and (D). 2.(C) UK DCM contacted Charge 2/8 to inquire into USG representations to the UAE on the issue of the Iraq ferries. The UK diplomat noted that the UAEG was claiming in New York to have the support of the U.S. Embassy for the establishment of a U.N.-approved cargo inspection facility in Dubai. Charge noted that our consistent position is that the ferries are not authorized to carry cargo, only passengers. The UK Consul-General in Dubai subsequently provided CG Dubai with texts of letters from the UAE's U.N. mission in New York to the 661 Committee (the latest dated 1/31) alleging -- based on a letter from UAE ferry operator Naif Marine Services -- that an "agreement" has been reached between Naif and "the MIF (Marine (sic) Interdiction Force) and the United States Embassy in Abu Dhabi" to allow inspection of cargo at Port Rashid by "an independent representative reporting to the 661 Committee." 3. (C) This representation by Naif Marine Services, repeated by the UAE mission, is simply incorrect. The idea of establishing a U.N. inspection facility at Port Rashid is an old one, which has been consistently rebuffed because the ferries are not authorized by the U.N. to carry cargo -- legitimate, inspected, or otherwise. This clear message was most recently delivered by the Ambassador directly to Dubai's de facto ruler, Shaykh Mohammed bin Rashid Al-Maktoum (MBR) in January (see reftel). We believe Naif is deliberately seeking to misrepresent our position now because without the cargo, its operations will be unprofitable. In recent low-level, operational discussions with Naif personnel, Mission staff and, we understand, MIF personnel, have been asked to comment on various proposals to work around the cargo restriction, but our response has been consistent: current permission exists for passengers and their personal effects only; any change to that status would need to be decided by the UNSC. WILLIAMS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04