Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03COLOMBO202 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03COLOMBO202 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Colombo |
| Created: | 2003-02-05 10:32:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN |
| Tags: | PGOV PTER PINR PARM ECON CE GM LTTE |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 051032Z Feb 03
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 COLOMBO 000202 SIPDIS NOFORN DEPARTMENT FOR SA, SA/INS, EUR/AGS; NSC FOR E. MILLARD LONDON FOR POL/RIEDEL E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/05/13 TAGS: PGOV, PTER, PINR, PARM, ECON, CE, GM, LTTE - Peace Process SUBJECT: Senior GSL Minister G.L. Peiris previews Berlin round and next steps for peace process Refs: Colombo 194, and previous (U) Classified by Lewis Amselem, Deputy Chief of Mission. Reasons 1.5 (b,d). 1. (C/NF) SUMMARY: In a February 3 meeting with the Ambassador, senior Sri Lankan Minister Peiris -- like other contacts -- set low expectations for the February 7-8 GSL-LTTE talks in Berlin. He said he primarily wanted to use Berlin to lay the groundwork for future rounds, including by raising division of power issues. He also underscored the importance of phased disarmament/demobilization by the LTTE. He said the GSL was newly focused on the need to show economic progress. Peiris was as sharp as ever, but seemed a bit weary with the weighty issues he is contending with. END SUMMARY. ---------------- PEIRIS ON BERLIN ---------------- 2. (C/NF) The Ambassador and polchief met February 3 with G.L. Peiris, the GSL Minister of Constitutional Affairs and Enterprise Development, and a key player on peace process issues. As with other contacts (see Reftels, including comments by GSL Minister Moragoda), Peiris set low expectations for the GSL talks with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) slated to take place in Berlin, February 7-8. (Note: The Berlin talks will constitute the fifth round of talks held between the two sides since September 2002. The Norwegian government is facilitating the talks.) One of the key reasons for low expectations, Peiris related, was that LTTE senior negotiator Anton Balasingham will not have been able to receive a briefing from LTTE leaders before Berlin and, thus, would not have received a "new mandate" from them. Given this situation, Balasingham would probably be reluctant to make any new commitments in Berlin. (Note: Balasingham had been scheduled to visit the LTTE-controlled Wanni region in northern Sri Lanka in January, but postponed the visit due to health concerns.) 3. (C/NF) One item on the agenda for Berlin, Peiris noted, was that of humanitarian and developmental assistance to LTTE-controlled areas. The Tigers had been vociferously complaining that the GSL's delivery of such assistance was poor and plagued by bureaucracy. Admitting to the Ambassador that the GSL was having a problem coordinating such assistance, Peiris wanted to use Berlin to assure the LTTE that the government was committed to do doing a better job in this area. (Note: In addition to assistance, human rights in LTTE- controlled areas are another agenda item.) ------------- THE WAY AHEAD ------------- 4. (C/NF) To stimulate LTTE thinking about the way ahead, Peiris remarked that he planned to hold a "private" meeting with Balasingham on the margins of the Berlin talks. At that meeting and in other discussions in the near-term, he wanted to touch on a number of issues with the LTTE, including: -- DIVISION OF POWERS: In his private chat with Balasingham, he wanted to raise possible division of power options relating to the north and east. The idea would be for the two sides to come up with a document that set out which powers would remain with the "center" and which would be given to a north/east unit. This document would represent a blueprint for a possible final settlement down the road. It might be possible to publicize an agreement on this issue at the March round if Balasingham was able to vet it with his authorities during his planned trip to the Wanni in early March. (Note: The sixth round of talks is scheduled to take place in Japan, March 18-21.) Re another division of powers issue, Peiris said the Muslim demand for a separate unit was not feasible. Muslims needed some protections, but these would have to worked out once a GSL-LTTE constitutional framework had been settled on -- and not before. It was unfortunate that Muslim leader Rauf Hakeem continued to demand a unit, but he was a weak leader trying to score points with his community. (Note: Peiris noted that in a visit to India later this month he planned to study how the Indian government dealt with minority issues in Darjeeling. What the GoI did regarding this region might be a possible model for what the GSL did regarding the Muslims, i.e., providing a community protections without creation of a full-blown constitutionally-mandated entity.) -- DISARMAMENT/DEMOBILIZATION: Peiris noted that disarmament/demobilization issues were important and needed to be discussed soon with the LTTE. The GSL's strong view was that the LTTE had to take phased steps along the road toward disarmament and demobilization. The idea was for the LTTE's military to be eventually brought into the Sri Lankan military structure. If all the LTTE's troops could not fit into the GSL military, then "productive" jobs would need to be found for those that were demobilized. It was also possible, however, that some LTTE units might be devolved into some sort of police or "civil guard" for the north and east. The Ambassador asked whether the GSL had given any thought to the notion that the LTTE might agree to international supervision of its long-range weapons on the Jaffna Peninsula. (Note: The Indian High Commissioner and the Ambassador discussed this idea in a February 3 meeting, per Reftel.) Peiris responded that this was a very constructive idea. (Note: At the request of the GSL, Satish Nambiar, a retired Indian general, has been visiting Sri Lanka the past several days. Nambiar's brief is to review the Sri Lankan military's security zones in Jaffna, and other matters related to possible military drawdowns by the GSL and LTTE.) -- LOCAL ELECTIONS IN NE: Another matter that Peiris said he planned to raise with Balasingham involved local elections in the north and east. These elections had been scheduled to take place last year, but had been postponed at the behest of the LTTE. The government was coming under some pressure to hold the elections because they could not be postponed indefinitely per the Sri Lankan Constitution. He added that he thought the holding of elections would be a good idea because it would test the support of the pro-LTTE Tamil National Alliance (TNA). Although the TNA would probably sweep the board, it would have to do so in a democratic context, with other parties -- including anti-LTTE Tamil parties (the EPDP, EPRLF) -- allowed to participate. Peiris said he planned to review with Balasingham the idea of holding the elections in May 2003. He was not sure what the LTTE's reaction would be. 5. (C/NF) Wrapping up this part of the conversation, Peiris commented that what the government most needed from the LTTE soon was some sort of "signal" from the group. While it was not clear, it seemed that the group was content as things were and it was not considering the next steps. This was creating a problem for the GSL, which needed to show the public in the south that the process still had traction. Given this situation, some sort of move by the Tigers showing that they are intent on ending forced child recruitment or ending taxation or starting disarmament, etc., would be most welcome. It would show to the Sinhalese south that the LTTE was committed to the process and wanted to make it irreversible. He added that he intended to tell Balasingham that positive moves would also help with opening the pockets of donors in the run-up to the international conference planned for Tokyo in June. The Ambassador, underscoring U.S. support for the GSL's peace initiative, remarked that Peiris' thinking was on target in that it was high time that the LTTE did more to move the peace process forward. -------------- ECONOMIC FOCUS -------------- 6. (C/NF) While working on the peace process, Peiris underlined that the government was also focused on the economy. The GSL knew that the president and the rest of the opposition, including the radical Janantha Vimukthi Peramuna party (JVP), were trying to make the economy a big issue. While the government felt relatively positive about rural areas, since the recent harvest had been good, it was a bit worried about urban areas where there had been price rises and other dislocations. The Prime Minister had ordered ministers to travel the country to show their concern about the economy to the public. Peiris related that he had recently visited Matara, a district in the deep south, to highlight various government initiatives. He noted that the United National Party (UNP) -- based on past stints in power -- had a good reputation as a manager of the economy, which it not want to lose. The Ambassador commented that this renewed emphasis on the economy was positive. That said, the U.S. would urge the government to continue to make economic reform and liberalization key priorities. Simply because the government felt vulnerable on the economy, did not mean it should put these priorities on the backburner. Peiris replied that reform and liberalization remained on the agenda, although plans in these areas needed careful modulation. ------- COMMENT ------- 7. (C/NF) Peiris, one of the country's best and most learned lawyers, is known to be extremely bright, and -- true to form -- he was as sharp as ever in the meeting. His comments indicated that he was thinking out complicated next steps in the peace process, including engagement with the LTTE on division of powers and on disarmament/demobilization issues. Whether the LTTE wants to play ball is another question entirely, but Peiris, at least, seemed to have a sensible-sounding outline of a plan. As Peiris discussed these matters, however, there was a bit of weariness about him, as if all the weighty issues he is contending with are getting him down. We had also noticed this seeming fatigue during a recent meeting with Milinda Moragoda, another key minister (see Reftel). It is as if the GSL has its hands full and is sweating it out a bit -- which is probably not the best frame of mind to have when negotiating with the hedgehog-like LTTE. END COMMENT. 8. (U) Minimize considered. WILLS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04