Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03ANKARA855 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03ANKARA855 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2003-02-03 15:50:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV PREL PHUM TU |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ANKARA 000855 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/04/2008 TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PHUM, TU SUBJECT: GERMAN DIPLOMATS OPTIMISTIC, BUT STILL CONCERNED ABOUT CASE AGAINST DEMOCRACY FOUNDATIONS REF: 02 ANKARA 7680 Classified by Polcouns John Kunstadter; reasons 1.5 b and d. 1. (C) Summary: PM Gul told German FM Fischer be believes five German foundations facing charges in Turkey will be acquitted. German diplomats agree the judge appears to be preparing to acquit, but consider the indictment a form of harassment and warn a conviction could weaken German support for Turkey's EU bid. End Summary. 2. (C) During a January 23 meeting in Istanbul, German FM Fischer told PM Gul he respected the independence of the Turkish judiciary, but hoped the case against the five German foundations (reftel) would quickly end in acquittal. Fischer asked the GOT to provide political support to the foundations -- the Friedrich Ebert, Konrad Adenauer, Heinrich Boll, and Friedrich Naumann foundations, as well as the Orient Institute. Gul agreed the charges against the foundations are "ridiculous." He predicted the case will end in acquittal, but said he cannot interfere in the judicial process. 3. (C) The second hearing of the case, held January 30, featured defense testimony from a former employee of the Normandy mining company. He accused the company of paying for the publication of a book claiming the foundations organized a campaign to prevent Normandy from mining for gold near Bergama in Turkey's Aegean region. The book constitutes the bulk of the evidence for the prosecution. Two German diplomats told poloff prosecutors did not cross examine the witness, giving the impression they believe they have a weak case. They said the judge called on the prosecution to conclude its case, at which point prosecuting attorneys asked for another hearing to prepare. According to the diplomats, attorneys for the foundations believe the judge wants to rule for acquittal soon, and may do so at the next hearing February 27. 4. (C) Fugen Ugur, of the Heinrich Boll Foundation, noted in a meeting with poloffs that judges in Turkey cannot dismiss an indictment without holding at least one hearing. She said the judge might have ruled for acquittal at the first hearing, on December 26, if not for the December 18 murder of Necip Hablemitoglu, the conspiracy theory-obsessed author of the book accusing the foundations. Ugur opined that, given the circumstances, the judge may have feared that closing the case after one hearing would have raised suspicions of a coverup. 5. (C) Despite the positive signals, the German diplomats said their Government is highly concerned about what it considers harassment of the foundations. They said the court is hounding the foundations with constant requests for documents, including birth certificates of foundation staff. The official line of the German Government is that the case has no bearing on Turkey's EU candidacy; however, one of the diplomats said, a conviction would likely cause Germany to seek to delay accession talks. PEARSON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04