Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 03KATHMANDU91 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 03KATHMANDU91 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Kathmandu |
| Created: | 2003-01-17 11:38:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREF PGOV PHUM NP Tibetan Refugees |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L KATHMANDU 000091 SIPDIS STATE FOR SA/INS LONDON FOR POL/REIDEL E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/16/2013 TAGS: PREF, PGOV, PHUM, NP, Tibetan Refugees SUBJECT: THREE MORE TIBETANS JAILED IN NEPAL Classified By: Ambassador Michael Malinowski for reasons b,d. 1. (SBU) Summary: Nepali Immigration Courts have sentenced three Tibetans to three years' imprisonment for failure to pay fines and visa fees resulting from their illegal presence in Nepal. UNHCR and the Office of Tibet have objected to the sentences, saying that the three Tibetans were on their way to India, and should have been handed over to UNHCR as "persons of concern." End summary. 2. (U) Three Tibetans, including two teenagers, have been sentenced to approximately three years in jail for failure to pay immigration fines handed down by Nepali courts on January 8. Yanglha Tso (age 15), Samdup (age 15) and Tashi (age 30) were arrested on December 13, 2002 in Boudha, a predominantly Tibetan area of Kathmandu. Nepal's Department of Immigration determined that the three were illegally present in Nepal and fined them each a total of 29085 NRs (372 USD). Unable to pay the fines, the three have been sentenced to "serve off" the amount at a rate of 25 NRs per day. The total sentence is approximately three years imprisonment. 3. (U) According to Wangchuk Tsering, the Dalai Lama's Representative in Nepal, the three Tibetans crossed the border from Tibet without documentation approximately two weeks before their arrest, intending to transit to India. After traveling to Kathmandu, they stayed for approximately three days in Boudha, a predominantly Tibetan area of the capital, before they were picked up by police. The Home Ministry told PolOff that the three Tibetans were in violation of Nepali immigration law, which does not allow Tibetans to settle in Nepal, and indicated to Tsering that the three had overstayed an unspecified "time limit." However, Tsering asserts that the Tibetans had no intention to stay. "They simply didn't know where to go," he said in a phone conversation with PolOff. "They had just arrived, and were trying to find out how to get to India." 4. (C) UNHCR has spoken to the GON on several occasions, reminding them of the "gentleman's agreement," under which GON authorities have informally agreed to report newly arrived Tibetans seeking transit to India to UNHCR for processing as "persons of concern." However, UNHCR Protection Officer Cecilia Becker indicates that the GON has been uncooperative in this case. The GON has not explained why police did not call UNHCR when they first encountered the Tibetans, nor why they did not release them once it was learned that they had only been in Nepal for a short time and were seeking to transit to India. 5. (U) The arrests bring the total number of Tibetans currently in jail for failure to pay immigration fines to twelve, though the number may soon drop back to eleven. Two of the eleven refugees arrested last year have been released following payment of their fines by German philanthropic organizations, and UNHCR told PolOff that a third is likely to be released under the same circumstances on Monday. 6. (C) Comment: These three arrests mark another step backward in the formerly cooperative relationship that UNHCR has enjoyed with the GON. Reported comments about a "time limit" for Tibetans transiting to India are worrisome indications that the "gentleman's agreement" is being increasingly ignored by the GON. Perhaps most worrisome are reports from UNHCR that the current Director of Immigration (DOI), appointed in November, has hinted that he does not believe that any such agreement exists. (Note: The Kathmandu respresentative of the International Campaign for Tibet has confirmed that the DOI told him very bluntly that "no such agreement exists." End note.) Post has called upon the Home Ministry to reinforce the GON's commitment to the "gentlemen's agreement," and will continue to express our support for UNHCR's efforts to facilitate the travel of legitimate asylum seekers on their way to India. MALINOWSKI
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04