Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 02ANKARA9192 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 02ANKARA9192 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2002-12-31 05:39:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ETRD EAGR KPAO TU USTR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 009192 SIPDIS SENSITIVE STATE FOR EUR/SE, EB/EPD, AND EB/TPP/ABT DEPT PLEASE PASS USTR FOR NOVELLI, DBIRDSEY, JHOFEMEISTER, AND SLOAN USDA FOR FAS FOR ITP/BERTSCH, MACKE, MEYER, THORBURN USDA FOR APHIS/LAMB USDOC FOR DEFALCO VIENNA FOR APHIS/VINCINANZA E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ETRD, EAGR, KPAO, TU, USTR SUBJECT: New Turkish Quarantine Regulations Sensitive but Unclassified. Not for Internet Distribution. 1. (SBU) Summary. Turkey has issued new quarantine regulations governing imports of all plants and plant products that is scheduled to go into effect on January 3, 2003. Turkey did not notify the WTO of the new regulations nor did Turkish officials notify Embassies of these changes. Despite requests for flexibility on implementation, Turkish officials will not postpone implementation. It is too soon to determine the regulation's effect on trade. End Summary. ------------------------- New Regulations Announced ------------------------- 2. (SBU) In July 2002, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA) published new regulations concerning quarantine of plants and commodities. No notification was sent to foreign embassies in Ankara regarding the regulations that are to be implemented on January 3, 2003. AgOffice became aware of the new regulations in October and requested more information. MARA officials from Protection and Control stated that the changes were minor. In addition, MARA officials promised to provide an English version of the 100-page document. ------------------------------- Ministry of Agriculture No Help ------------------------------- 3. (SBU) After repeated delays and promises, MARA provided an English copy of the regulations at the beginning of December. A copy was sent to the regional APHIS official in Vienna who in turn sent it to Washington for review. After consulting with APHIS/Vienna, AgCounselor met with the Turkish General Directorate of Protection and Control, Dr. Huseyin Sungur, on December 19 to discuss the new regulations and request some flexibility in implementation. Dr. Sungur repeatedly stated that he had no authority to postpone implementation and insisted that he foresaw no major problems with the new regulations. Sungur also noted that his country had notified the World Trade Organization of the new regulations. Note: A Subsequent check with the WTO turned out that there had been no formal notification. End note. 4. (SBU) Following the Sungur meeting, AgCounselor met with Sinan Varol, head of the Department for External Relations at MARA. In addition to several other issues, AgCounselor informed Varol of the situation and the difficulties it would cause both U.S. and Turkish businesses. Varol stated that this was the responsibility of Protection and Control and that his office had no control or influence on this issue. ---------------------------- Little Help at Foreign Trade ---------------------------- 5. (SBU) On December 19, AgCounselor and EconOff met with Tuncer Kayalar, the Under Secretary for Foreign Trade. U/S Kayalar was sympathetic to our request and asked some of his staff to contact the Agriculture Ministry regarding our request. However it was clear, given the various comments, that Foreign Trade had to follow MARA's lead on this issue. Moreover, there was little that could be done to change the law by January 3. Kayalar's staff acknowledged that Turkey had not submitted a notification on the new regulations to the WTO but other than looking a little sheepish offered little to rectify the situation. In fact, the Ministry felt that it was MARA's responsibility to inform all parties on the any changes in regulations. --------------- Impact on Trade --------------- 6. (SBU) It is difficult to fully assess the impact the new regulations will have on trade. AgAnkara has already received calls from concerned importers. The initial assessment from APHIS/Washington is that there will be a lot to review and that the changes are not as "minor" as the Turks have stated. On the other hand, the Turkish officials stated that they are based on EU quarantine regulations so that there should not be any major surprises. In any case, Post will monitor the situation after implementation and report any disruption in trade. --------------------------------- Comment: Keeping the Pressure On --------------------------------- 7. (SBU) In recent years, we have consistently raised with GOT our concerns about its failure to notify the WTO systematically of rule changes. We will continue to make this point to the new government, and will emphasize the link between implementing international rules and attracting foreign investment. Pearson
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04