Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 91MOSCOW35835 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 91MOSCOW35835 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Moscow |
| Created: | 1991-12-13 20:40:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV PNAT PREL UR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
P 132040Z DEC 91 FM AMEMBASSY MOSCOW TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4479 INFO MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 MOSCOW 035835 DEPT FOR D, P, C/E, S/P, AND EUR/SOV E.O. 12356: DECL:OADR TAGS: PGOV, PNAT, PREL, UR SUBJECT: GEORGIAN REPUBLIC'S RELATIONS WITH MOSCOW 1. CONFIDENTIAL - ENTIRE TEXT. 2. SUMMARY: GEORGIANS SEE UKRAINIAN INDEPENDENCE SEALING THE FATE OF THE SOVIET UNION AND RESULTING IN, AT MOST, A MINOR ADVISORY ROLE FOR THE CENTER. REPUBLIC LEADERS CONTINUE TO PRESS FOR U.S. DIPLOMATIC PRESENCE IN TBILISI AND FOR OUR MORAL/POLITICAL SUPPORT FOR GEORGIAN INDEPENDENCE. OPINION ON YEL'TSIN AND RUSSIA IS DIVIDED. MOST SEE THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT AS LESS THREATENING THAN THE SOVIET, BUT FEAR ADDITIONAL COUPS COULD UNSEAT MOSCOW REFORMERS. DISTRUST OF SHEVARDNADZE IS GROWING. END SUMMARY --------------------------------------------- --------- END OF THE SOVIET UNION --------------------------------------------- ---------- 3. DURING DECEMBER 4-7 VISIT BY EMBOFFS TO TBILISI, GEORGIAN INTERLOCUTORS OPINED THE DEMISE OF THE SOVIET UNION IN THE WAKE OF THE UKRAINIAN REFERENDUM. BOTH GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION SOURCES FELT THE UKRAINIAN VOTE FOR INDEPENDENCE OPENED THE FINL ACT FOR THE SOVIET UNION. THE DIRECTOR OF THE GEORGIAN NEWS AGENCY, IRAKLI KENCHASHVILI, SAID GORBACHEV WAS FIGHTING AGAINST A HISTORICAL PROCESS, SINCE EMPIRES CANNOT SURVIVE INTO THE 21ST CENTURY. OPPOSITION PARLIAMENTARIAN AND FORMER HEAD OF THE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE, TEDO PAATASHVILI, SAID THAT IN PRACTICAL TERMS NO REPUBLIC REALLY NEEDS THE CENTER. HE PREDICTED THE MOST CENTER OFFICIALS COULD HOPE FOR IS A VERY LOOSE ASSOCIATION, PROVIDING SUGGESTIONS TO INDEPENDENT STATES. --------------------------------------------- ---------- REQUEST FOR U.S. MORAL AND POLITICAL SUPPORT --------------------------------------------- ---------- 4. EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE BRANCH SOURCES REQUESTED U.S. MORAL AND POLITICAL SUPPORT FOR GEORGIA'S INDEPENDENCE, CLAIMING THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE ARE BEHIND THE CURVE ON THE SOVIET DEMISE. PROCURATOR GENERAL ABAKELIA STATED THERE IS NO REASON FOR THE U.S. TO RECOGNIZE THE UKRAINE, BUT NOT GEORGIA. IN A SESSION WITH PARLIAMENTARIANS, THE FATHER OF JAILED OPPOSITION JOURNALIST GEORGIY HAINDRAVA TOLD EMBOFFS THE U.S. HAD HISTORICALLY LET GEORGIA DOWN, BEING IN 1920 THE ONLY GREAT POWER NOT TO RECOGNIZE ITS INDEPENDENT STATUS, AND NOW AVOIDING ANY STATEMENT CONGRATULATING GEORGIA'S DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. IN APPEALING FOR U.S. SUPPORT, GEORGIANS OF ALL STRIPES POINTED OUT THAT GEORGIA CONTAINS A SEPARATE PEOPLE, LANGUAGE, RELIGION AND CULTURE FROM RUSSIA; HAS AN OLD TRADITION OF STATEHOOD; AND CONSTITUTES NO THREAT TO ITS NEIGHBORS. BY SUPPORTING THE REPUBLICS, THEY ARGUE, THE U.S. CAN DEMONSTRATE THERE IS NO LONGER ANY NEED OF EMPIRES. THEY CLAIMED AN INDEPENDENT, &HRISTIAN GEORGIA, LOCATED IN THE MIDST OF MOSLEM NEIGHBORS, COULD POSITIVELY INFLUENCE EVENTS IN TURKEY, IRAN, AND THE REST OF THE MOSLEM WORLD. THEY ALSO ARGUED THAT AN INDEPENDENT GEORGIA COULD PLAY A GREATER ROLE IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN AZERBAIJAN AND ARMENIA. IN ARGUING FOR A U.S. DIPLOMATIC MISSION IN TBILISI, THE GEORGIAN OPPOSITION STATED THAT ISOLATION FROM THE WEST WOULD NOT HELP THE LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION. A U.S. MISSION, THEY SAID, COULD INFLUENCE LOCAL EVENTS AND "CONSTRAIN THE DICTATOR." --------------------------------------------- ---------- HOPE FOR RUSSIAN MODERATION --------------------------------------------- ---------- 5. OPINION WAS DIVIDED ON RUSSIA'S RELATIONS WITH THE REPUBLICS. SOME SOURCES, LIKE PRESIDENTIAL CHIEF OF STAFF, MERAB KLIMIASHVILI, SEEMED LESS WORRIED ABOUT YEL'TSIN AND THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT, FEELING THAT ITS IMPERIAL AMBITIONS, UNLIKE THE SOVIET GOVERNMENT'S, HAVE FINALLY BEEN LAID TO REST. AS HE PUT IT, "THANK GOD RUSSIA FINALLY WANTS TO LIVE ON ITS OWN." KLIMIASHVILI STILL HAD SOME CONCERNS, HOWEVER, SINCE HE SAW DEMOCRATS IN MOSCOW IN THE MINORITY. HE PERCEIVED A CONTINUING DANGER "THAT HEIRS OF THE SOVIET SYSTEM WITH TOTALITARIAN, IMPERIALIST, NON-DEMOCRATIC TENDENCIES COULD REASSERT THEMSELVES." THIS SENTIMENT WAS ECHOED BY OPPOSITION PARLIAMENTARIAN PAATASHVILI, WHO DID NOT FEAR A STRONG RUSSIAN REPUBLIC "IF IT SAYS IT DOESN'T WANT TERRITORIES BEYOND ITS BORDERS." CITING YEL'TSIN'S MODERATE PUBLIC RESPONSE TO THE UKRAINIAN REFERENDUM, PAATASHVILI SAID THAT RUSSIA, UNLIKE THE CENTER, IS A LARGE COUNTRY IN ITS OWN RIGHT, AND IS NOT RELIANT ON AN ARTIFICIAL EMPIRE. HOWEVER, HE ADDED THE CAVEAT OF UNCERTAINTY OVER FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS, SAYING "THE POSSIBILITY EXISTS THAT MORE SERIOUS COUPS COULD LEAD TO CONTROL BY A MILITARY LEADER WHO WOULD TRY TO RESTORE EVERYTHING." HE ALSO ADMITED THAT SMALL NATIONS WITHIN THE RUSSIAN REPUBLIC HAVE MORE TO FEAR THAN THE SEPARATE REPUBLICS. 6. OTHER SOURCES WERE MORE CAUTIOUS ON THE RUSSIAN REPUBLIC. IN GENERAL, SOVIET, RATHER THAN RUSSIAN, TROOPS WERE CASTIGATED FOR INCITING TROUBLES IN OSSETIA (SEPTEL), PROMPTING A CURRENT BILL BEFORE THE LEGISLATURE TO REMOVE SOVIET INTERIOR MINISTRY AND NAVAL ELEMENTS FROM GEORGIAN TERRITORY. AT THE SAME TIME, HOWEVER, RUSSIAN NEWSPAPERS WERE SEEN AS PROVIDING DISINFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE SOVIETS. FORMER PRIME MINISTER TENGIZ SIGUA BLAMED BOTH RUSSIA AND THE CENTER FOR PROBLEMS IN OSSETIA, SAYING COMPETITION BETWEEN THE MOSCOW "WHITE HOUSE" AND THE KREMLIN LEAVES LOCAL SOVIET INTERIOR MINISTRY AND KGB FORCES BEYOND ANYONE'S CONTROL. SEVERAL INTERLOCUTORS ALSO IMPLIED LINGERING FEAR OF RUSSIAN EXPANSIONISM. ONE GEORGIAN LEGISLATOR CLAIMED THAT EVEN DEMOCRATS IN RUSSIA NEVER UNDERSTOOD SMALL NATIONS LIKE GEORGIA. NEWS DIRECTOR KENSCHASVILI HAD NO USE FOR THE CENTER OR RUSSIA. HE SAID "EARLIER WE NEEDED GORBACHEV, THEN WE NEEDED YEL'TSIN, NOW WE DON'T EVEN NEED HIM." ONE OPPOSITION SOURCE TOLD CIRCUIT RIDERS HE FEARED YEL'TSIN AS WELL, SAYING THE RUSSIAN PRESIDENT WILL "SHOW HIS TEETH YET." 7. THERE WAS ALSO SOME DISTRUST OF SHEVARDNADZE WHOSE RE-EMERGENCE AS SOVIET FOREIGN MINISTER WAS SEEN BY THE NEWS DIRECTOR AND OTHERS AS OPPORTUNISTIC. BOTH PRESIDENT GAMASHKURDIA (SEPTEL) AND OPPOSITION LEADERS LABELLED SHEVARDNADZE A REMNANT OF THE BREZHNEV SYSTEM, REMEMBERED FOR HIS ROLE AS REPUBLIC FIRST SECRETARY. GAMSAKHURDIA CALLED SHEVARDNADZE "A GREAT ACTOR" WHO FEIGNED A SPLIT WITH GORBACHEV SO HE COULD RETURN TO GEORGIA AND HOLD IT IN THE UNION. THE GEORGIAN PRESIDENT ADDED THAT SHEVARDNADZE IS TO THIS DAY STILL LEADING THE FIGHT AGAINST GEORGIA'S NATIONAL GOVERNMENT, USING THE LOCAL COMMUNIST MAFIA TO CREATE DISSENT AND ECONOMIC INSTABILITY. COLLINS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04