Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ROME4046 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ROME4046 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2005-12-13 08:18:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | KIPR ETRD EINV IT EUN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 130818Z Dec 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 ROME 004046 SIPDIS STATE PASS USTR FOR JIM SANFORD USDOC PASS USPTO COMMERCE FOR DAS ERIC STEWART JUSTICE FOR ARIF ALIKAN E.O. 12356: N/A TAGS: KIPR, ETRD, EINV, IT, EUN SUBJECT: IPR Public Education in Italy: Refining the Message, Medium to Reach All REF: ROME 1569 ------- Summary ------- 1. Uneven IPR enforcement by police remains a problem in Italy, but a lack of respect for intellectual property among the general public also represents a significant hurdle. Some 20 percent of Italian consumers, according to a recent poll, admit to buying fakes. The Embassy, in cooperation with the Italian Ministry of Culture, recently gathered key government and industry IPR experts for a brainstorming session. This outreach session confirmed that GOI public education campaigns, in the eyes of industry observers, have failed to deliver a consistent, effective message about the damage of IPR crime to Italy's economy. American participants shared examples of IPR public outreach programs, particularly DOJ's student-focused "Activate Your Mind" program. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office also discussed its outreach to small businesses as a possible model. As a result of the workshop, the Ministry of Culture has offered to take the lead in future GOI-sponsored public education campaigns. End summary. ---------- Background ---------- 2. Italy is now widely recognized as having adopted adequate IPR laws. However, while there is some progress, much remains to be done on effective street-level enforcement and meaningful sentencing. Italian magistrates still see piracy as a petty offence and remain reluctant to impose jail time. Mission Italy will thus continue its efforts to sensitize Italian judges to the serious nature of IPR crime, including the heavy involvement of Italian and international organized crime. 3. Another weak link, however, is the lack of sensitivity among Italian consumers. A recent poll sponsored by the Guardia di Finanza (Italy's financial police) showed that 20 percent of consumers admit to purchasing counterfeit products. While the GOI is conducting some education efforts, (e.g., officials of SIAE, the Italian government's royalty collection agency, visit schools to speak with students about piracy and illegal downloading), these programs are small in scale. The Mission, along with our contacts in the United States and Italian copyright industries, see the need for a coordinated, wide-scale GOI effort to educate Italian society about the damage of IPR crime--in the form of more organized crime, lower employment in the Italian IP industries, potential safety and health hazards posed by counterfeited goods, and lost investment and tax revenue--to Italy. --------------------------------- First Workshop on Public Outreach --------------------------------- 4. To open this campaign, the Embassy, in collaboration with the Italian Ministry of Culture, hosted a public outreach "brainstorming session" with key GOI officials and U.S. experts. This two- day roundtable workshop took place at ConGen Florence using a format similar to those used in our workshops with Italian judges (reftel). Key to the success of this event was its informal and off-the- record nature, which allowed a more candid and fruitful exchange of ideas. 5. Italian participants included high-level officials from the Italian Ministries of Culture, Education, and Productive Activities; the Italian Society of Authors and Editors (SIAE), Confindustria (Italy's main business association); Italian anti- mafia judges; and Florence city officials. Additionally, communications experts from a think tank and a private consulting firm offered advice on refining the GOI's public education campaigns. Finally, representatives from the Business Software Alliance (BSA), FAPAV (an Italian film industry association affiliated with the Motion Picture Association), and FIMI (a music industry group representing U.S. labels here) provided industry perspectives. 6. From the United States, the Embassy invited Arif Alikan, Vice Chairman and Executive Director of the Department of Justice Task Force on Intellectual Property; Trent Luckinbill, Council to the Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division; Elizabeth Shaw from the U.S. Patent and Trade Office's Department of International Relations; and Deborah Foster, Senior Program Director at Street Law, an NGO that specializes in legal education programs for students and has participated in recent DOJ student outreach efforts. -------------------- Sympathy for Pirates -------------------- 7. Participants generally criticized the (few) public campaigns conducted to date in Italy as ineffective and possibly even confusing for consumers. There was broad consensus that the GOI had not done enough to explain the difference between legal activity (for example, making personal-use copies) and IPR infringement. Similarly, both government and industry have not generated much public sympathy for rights holders as many consumers, frustrated by the high cost of legitimate CDs and DVDs in Italy, tend to believe infringers are doing them a favor. 8. Some participants also noted the need for the GOI itself to set an example on IPR. Some participants commented that, despite recent improvements, some Italian government offices, particularly at the local and regional level, continue to use unlicensed software. BSA representatives said the situation may get worse as many bureaucracies cope with sharper budget cuts. ------------------------------ The Enforcement-Education Link ------------------------------ 9. Several additional themes emerged from the discussions, including: --Link Between Public Education and Enforcement: Many participants commented that better enforcement is the best public education tool. Participants observed that an April 2005 law that created a maximum euro 10,000 fine for the purchase or possession of counterfeit items, has helped increase public awareness of IPR. At the same time, enforcement with no public outreach risks creating a backlash. Unless Italians understand the seriousness of IPR theft (especially organized-crime involvement) they will tend to oppose crackdowns on consumers and street vendors. Many Italians tend to sympathize with the immigrant vendors and see the sale of fake bags and pirated music as a relatively harmless way for these immigrants to earn a living and allow budget tourists to return home with affordable gifts. --Need for Both Soft-Sell and Hard-Sell Approaches: Much of the debate centered on what themes IPR public outreach should emphasize. A public communications expert pointedly criticized the anti- piracy ads shown in Italian movie theaters. Ordinary consumers, he said, tend to dismiss the menacing images (accompanied by loud heavy-metal music) of people in handcuffs. Others argued that, while the "law-and-order" message is important, public service campaigns also need to explain why IPR is necessary for Italy's economic and cultural well-being. --Importance of Student Outreach: There was near- unanimous agreement on the importance of student outreach. Italian officials expressed great interest in the Department of Justice's "Activate Your Mind" project, a student education program the DOJ is conducting in cooperation with Street Law and Court TV. Many were impressed that Attorney General Gonzales had himself spoken at U.S. public schools to discourage Internet piracy. --More Private/Public Sector Cooperation: Industry and the GOI should make a greater effort to coordinate activities by creating alliances among the media, labor unions, chambers of commerce, consumer associations, and local governments to promote IPR protection. The deputy commander of Florence's municipal police briefed the workshop on police efforts to inform both tourists and locals about Italy's IPR laws and the danger of heavy fines. Florence police have enlisted local merchants to distribute flyers explaining the law and have posted notices on buses and in taxis. Florence police, she said, make a point of conducting systematic and highly visible raids against street vendors as a complement to this outreach. [Comment: We believe the Florence campaign is bearing fruit. Econoffs have seen a decrease in street vending in the city over the past year. Predictably, however, city police are loathe to apply what many view as excessively high fines for purchase and possession of counterfeited goods. Thus, unless the level of the penalty is reduced, it is unlikely that city police will increase enforcement activities. Alternative sentencing, such as community service, is not an option in Italy. End comment.] ---------------------------------- Ministry of Culture Takes the Lead ---------------------------------- 10. In concluding the event, Culture Ministry Director General Paolo Carini indicated that the Ministry would take the lead for IPR public outreach and cooperate further with the U.S. Embassy to develop ideas. He also indicated a desire to work with Italy's Education Ministry to promote IPR legality in schools and universities. He also stated his office will try to obtain more budgetary resources for IPR campaigns. ------- Comment ------- 11. This workshop revealed the need for better coordination within the GOI, and among industry associations, on IPR public education. Copyright industry groups in Italy, which largely represent the interests of American multinationals, have resources to spend on public education; but government agencies by-and-large are reluctant to cooperate closely with business. The Ministry of Culture is a good candidate to spearhead IPR outreach programs because it is the lead agency with responsibility for copyright enforcement. The Ministry also has authority over Italy's royalty collection society, SIAE, which generates large amounts of cash for the GOI via a surcharge on the sale of books, music, movies, and software. We hope that, in the future, SIAE will devote more of these funds to promoting respect for IPR among the general public. Recent leadership changes at SIAE leave us optimistic that this agency will become more active in anti-piracy efforts here. End comment. Spogli
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04