Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05PARIS8397 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05PARIS8397 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Paris |
| Created: | 2005-12-12 13:51:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR FR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 008397 SIPDIS DEPT FOR INR/R/MR; IIP/RW; IIP/RNY; BBG/VOA; IIP/WEU; AF/PA; EUR/WE /P/SP; D/C (MCCOO); EUR/PA; INR/P; INR/EUC; PM; OSC ISA FOR ILN; NEA; WHITE HOUSE FOR NSC/WEUROPE; DOC FOR ITA/EUR/FR AND PASS USTR/PA; USINCEUR FOR PAO; NATO/PA; MOSCOW/PA; ROME/PA; USVIENNA FOR USDEL OSCE. E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, FR SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION REPORT - WTO Ministerial in Hong Kong Iraq Climate Change Conference PARIS - Monday, December 12, 2005 (A) SUBJECTS COVERED IN TODAY'S REPORT: WTO Ministerial in Hong Kong Iraq Climate Change Conference B) SUMMARY OF COVERAGE: Ambassador Stapleton signs an op ed in Saturday's Le Figaro entitled: "We Need France in a New Agreement on Trade." "The U.S., the EU and other trade partners share a common goal to strengthen multilateral trade and economic growth. France, which has rightly reaffirmed the importance of multilateralism, needs to share in this new cycle. for the sake of world prosperity." The WTO and the Hong Kong Ministerial are today's major front page and editorial stories. For Le Figaro as well as Liberation, failure is in the cards. An op-ed in Liberation points an accusing finger at France and its agricultural demands: "What will France get? Our image will be tarnished even more and we will be made to pay for this later, in other negotiations." (See Part C) Liberation interviews WTO Secretary General Pascal Lamy: "We have a 55% chance of SIPDIS succeeding in Hong Kong. The fundamental issue that divides WTO members is whether agriculture is an economic activity like all others or whether outside factors make it different." A poll in Liberation shows that 52 percent of the French fear globalization. The Kyoto protocol and the end of the Montreal conference are also a major story. Liberation titles its report: "To keep from being isolated, the U.S. promises to negotiate, but makes no promises." Le Figaro announces on its front page: "The U.S. Does Not Bend in Montreal." Le Monde quotes former President Clinton on its front page: "I Like Kyoto." (See Part C) The tenth anniversary of the Dayton accords elicits several op- eds. In Le Figaro, former FM Michel Barnier pens an opinion piece stressing that "the Balkans are definitely in Europe" while in Liberation writer Sylvie Matton denounces the Dayton- Paris accords as "`inept,' like all peace treaties signed `under gunfire.'" She faults Richard Halbrooke and points to "the collective responsibility of western and UN officials" in the genocide of Srebreniza. Le Figaro reports on the U.S. efforts to train the Iraqi army in a story by correspondent Adrien Jaulmes writing from Camp India. A report in Le Journal du Dimanche on the French hostage Bernard Planche underscores his "taste for American- sounding acronyms." According to Le Journal du Dimanche, his humanitarian company, Aaccess, has a namesake in Cleveland, "but its activities are not related to Iraq and no one in this Arab-American association appears to know Planche." Le Journal du Dimanche also reports on Kurdistan, "autonomous and far from the war, where Christians and Muslims live in peaceful cohabitation and where the economy is picking up." The article is entitled "When Peace Reigns in Iraq." Gilles Delafon titles his political column "Iraq: for Better or Worse." (See Part C) Communist l'Humanite carries a picture of Angela Davies on its front page and a two-page interview inside in connection with her latest book, `Abolition Democracy,' and her trip to France this week. She discusses the Bush administration and the Patriot Act. A side bar notes the L.A. Times article on Saturday about a Bill to amend the legislation conferring automatic U.S. citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. In domestic news, a poll in Le Journal du Dimanche shows that 36% of respondents pick Interior Minister Sarkozy as their favorite UMP candidate for the 2007 presidential election, 19 percent pick Villepin, and only one percent picks Chirac. (C) SUPPORTING TEXT/BLOCK QUOTES: WTO Ministerial in Hong Kong "Threats on Free Trade" Nicolas Barre in right-of-center Le Figaro (12/12/): "The chances of moving free trade along in Hong Kong are practically nil. This failure is doubly worrisome. The objectives of the Doha Round were set just after 9/11 and the aim was to lift the poorest nations from extreme poverty. The urgency resided in fighting resentment through progress. Hence the name `development cycle.' Failure in Hong Kong would also be terrible news for developed nations. Those who raise the specter of free trade have short memories. They have forgotten the motto of `trade rather than war' that was used after the Second World War against protectionism. Since then, free trade has progressed while wars have regressed. There is no need to prove the beneficial aspects of open markets. Yet, failure is on the horizon. For the U.S., the EU is the perfect fall guy with its agricultural subsidies, which are hampering an agreement on industrial goods and services. The Europeans for their part point a finger at emerging agricultural nations and at the U.S., which has everything to gain from the EU subsidies' system being dismantled. But it matters little who the guilty party is in the end. If Hong Kong fails, everybody loses." "Words and Actions" Jean-Michel Helvig in left-of-center Liberation (12/12): "Globalization frightens everyone: everyone else's gains is seen as a threat. If one adds electoral posturing by a minority with a majority impact, it is not surprising to hear everyone talking about failure in Hong Kong. The structural mechanisms of economic inequalities have been exposed and have emphasized the gap between words and actions of wealthy nations. The weaker elements in this battle are not totally powerless: they have a certain capacity for harm. Progress will be impossible unless everyone adapts." "A Commercial Three-Card Monty" Francoise Crouigneau in right-of-center Les Echos (12/12): "Hong Kong was supposed to crown five years of negotiations. Instead, and at best, it will look like a game of commercial three-card Monty with global dimensions. Everyone hopes to avoid the worst: a wake for the Doha Round. Once again all eyes are on agriculture. The U.S. has made tempting promises to reduce its subsidies in order to shift attention on the EU. but without any guarantees that they will be adopted in Congress. France meanwhile needs to keep its eyes on negotiations within negotiations: alongside Hong Kong, there is the CAP and the British rebate. The foursome, U.S., EU, Brazil and India, is the dominant force. But China is not far behind, ready to align with whoever serves best its own national interests. One thing is certain: no one will gain from a disagreement in Hong Kong. Failure in Hong Kong would weaken even more the multilateral dynamic, which is already suffering from too many bilateral agreements, and deprive the WTO of its credibility. The anti-globalization movement should be aware that by shouting `sink the WTO' it is shooting itself in the foot. The WTO, while needing to reform, remains the only institution able to regulate international trade." Iraq "For Better or Worse" Gilles Delafon in right-of-center Le Journal du Dimanche (12/12): "On Thursday, Iraq will be facing one of the most important political tests of its history. The elections will determine its future but could also, paradoxically, trigger the civil war everyone fears. The stakes are enormous. So much so that it is triggering a confrontation between Iraq, Iran and the U.S. Serving as background to this confrontation is control for the world's largest oil reserves, which are located in Shiite dominated regions near Iran. Security issues make up the major theme of the elections: suicide attacks are on the rise and half a dozen foreigners have been kidnapped in the past few days. The new Iraqi army is accused of torturing its Sunni prisoners and Shiite candidates are being assassinated. Logically, the elections should be won by the Islamic pro-Iranian Shiites. The danger lurking is that Baghdad will fall into the hands of Tehran's Ayatollahs, thus upsetting America's plans. But there is a chance that the Islamic Shiites will not succeed, because other alliances, such as an alliance between the Kurds, disappointed Shiites and secular Sunnis could form. The problem is that such an alliance could trigger a different type of unrest. On Thursday, the Iraqis will hold the key to their future, for better or worse." Climate Change Conference "The U.S. Stays on the Outside" Caroline Malet in right-of-center Le Figaro (12/12): "The surprise end to the Montreal Conference came with the U.S. giving its green light to the final text. It is a fact that former President Clinton's address was like a thorn in the U.S. representatives' side which served to isolate the U.S. a little bit more. Clinton deconstructed the Bush administration's logic, and came after two previous attacks, from the Canadian Prime Minister and from President Chirac. Montreal leaves the door ajar for the U.S. to step in." "Criticism of the U.S. by the U.S." Herve Kempf in left-of-center Le Monde (12/12): "The Bush administration continues to play its role of bad boy in the climate change negotiations. But this attitude, which has been isolating Washington, is increasingly being criticized inside the U.S. A stunning illustration was given by former President Clinton, who tore down each of the Bush administration's arguments. With this address, former President Clinton sets himself up as the leader of an American movement to fight climate change." STAPLETON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04