Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BRATISLAVA959 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BRATISLAVA959 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bratislava |
| Created: | 2005-12-06 15:12:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL ECON EU LO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 061512Z Dec 05
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRATISLAVA 000959 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/05/2015 TAGS: PREL, ECON, EU, LO SUBJECT: EU BUDGET, ENLARGEMENT TOR PRIORITIES FOR SLOVAKIA REF: STATE 217518 Classified By: DCM Lawrence R. Silverman for reasons 1.4 b and d. 1. (C) Pol-Econ chief presented reftel points to Zuzana Dutkova, Division of European Affairs at the Slovak Republic. Dutkova did not comment on the points. Rather, she said Slovakia's absolute priority is to get an EU budget passed. Slovakia has been willing to compromise, even to the point of angering some of its V-4 neighbors, because it sees the passage of the budget and the mechanism for disbursing funds as more important than preserving the total amounts now proposed for the new member states. They also want to work with UK PM Blair (with whom they largely agree on budgetary issues), rather than publicly criticize him. 2. (C) Milan Jezovica, foreign policy advisor to Prime Minister Dzurinda, told the DCM December 5 that the Slovaks have indeed taken a more pragmatic view of the issue, based on wanting Tony Blair to succeed. Jezovica said the EU needs to get the budget passed, and Slovakia is skeptical the Austrians could do it under their presidency. He related that at the meeting with Blair in Budapest last week, the Czechs and Hungarians put up a fight and then backed off; the Poles did not relent. (Comment: We note that the Czechs appear to have accepted Blair's 12/5 compromise, but the Poles and Hungarians continue to oppose.) The Slovaks are opposed to the Polish approach and stance. Dzurinda did not want to make a scene at the press conference on Friday, so he did not show a public difference with the Poles. However, the Slovaks say that, unlike their V-4 neighbors, they do not want to cut off their nose to spite their face. Joszef Berenyi, MFA State Secretary in charge of EU affairs, provided an analogy to the DCM (and the press): If someone offers you 10,000 euros to row across the Danube, do you take the risk, not really knowing whether you'll survive or get paid even if you do? Or do you cross the river via the bridge for 10,000 euros, knowing that when you get to the other side, the guy is only going to pay you 9000? You should cross via the bridge and take the 9000, because you're much more likely to be able to collect. 3. (C) Jezovica said that, unlike his counterparts, Dzurinda had decided to focus on accessibility to the funds, rather than fixating on the amounts (which Slovakia predicted would be cut in any case). Berenyi, who is also a Blair fan, was more specific. The Slovaks asked for non-monetary concessions from Blair and the EU in exchange for going along with some cuts: -- Raising the maximum proportion of each project that could be financed with EU funds from the current 75% to 85%, at the discretion of the recipient country; -- Allowing funding to be used for housing, something now prohibited by the EU. This would help the GOS fund the housing for Kia-related employees in Zilina; -- Lengthening the time period of grants from 2 to 3 or 4 years. Berenyi said the funds remaining after 2 years have to be repaid if they have not been spent yet; and -- A refund of VAT, which would be particularly valuable to the regions and towns. 4. (C) On December 1 we learned that Slovakia had refused join other new member states in signing a letter to Blair. Jezovica clarified this decision within the GOS. Originally, the V-4 (including Slovakia) agreed to do a relatively mild open letter on the issue as an op-ed piece, but the Financial Times, after getting more information via leaks from some governments, no longer considered the open letter newsworthy. When this failed, the ten new member states put together a sharper private letter, reportedly at Polish and Czech urging. The Slovaks declined to sign this letter, not wanting to "slap Blair in the face before hearing from him" in Budapest, according to Jezovica. He added that the Slovaks had tried to calm down the Poles before the Budapest meeting, but the Poles and Czechs "seem to see us as traitors" on this issue. Enlargement a Top Priority --------------------------- 5. (C) Regarding the agenda for the December 12 GAERC, Dutkova said enlargement was a priority for Slovakia. Some members, such as France, want to link the enlargement process to ratification of the constitutional treaty and the budget. However, for Slovakia enlargement is a separate, important issue for the EU to deal with. The GOS sees potential EU membership as an indispensable motivating tool for reform in the Balkans and Ukraine, particularly. Dutkova called Prime Minister Dzurinda's November statement in Germany, when he spoke about the EU taking a pause from enlargement, an "unhappy interpretation." That statement was not representative of Slovakia's policy. VALLEE NNNN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04