Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05PARIS8256 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05PARIS8256 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Paris |
| Created: | 2005-12-06 12:12:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR FR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 008256 SIPDIS DEPT FOR INR/R/MR; IIP/RW; IIP/RNY; BBG/VOA; IIP/WEU; AF/PA; EUR/WE /P/SP; D/C (MCCOO); EUR/PA; INR/P; INR/EUC; PM; OSC ISA FOR ILN; NEA; WHITE HOUSE FOR NSC/WEUROPE; DOC FOR ITA/EUR/FR AND PASS USTR/PA; USINCEUR FOR PAO; NATO/PA; MOSCOW/PA; ROME/PA; USVIENNA FOR USDEL OSCE. E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, FR SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION REPORT - Secretary Rice to Europe - Allegations About CIA Rendition Flights European Defense PARIS - Tuesday, December 06, 2005 (A) SUBJECTS COVERED IN TODAY'S REPORT: Secretary Rice to Europe - Allegations About CIA Rendition SIPDIS Flights European Defense B) SUMMARY OF COVERAGE: Economic stories dominate today's front pages with 8.3 billion euros worth of Airbus contacts signed with China. Catholic La Croix devotes its lead and several articles to China's economic strategy in connection with the Airbus transfer of technology agreement. Political considerations in the Villepin- Sarkozy match are also front-page news in Le Figaro and Liberation as the UMP considers primaries to select the presidential candidate for 2007, a first in France. A poll in Liberation shows that after the recent suburban violence, Villepin is ahead of Sarkozy, with 53 percent of respondents behind him as opposed to Sarkozy with only 49 percent. Secretary Rice's trip to Europe is announced in Le Monde's SIPDIS front page: "Condi Rice Under Pressure in Europe" and Le Figaro's inside report carries extensive quotes from her explanations prior to her departure. Liberation headlines "CIA Secret Prisons: Rice Explains." "Before leaving for Europe, SIPDIS Rice decided not to apologize, but read instead a firm statement to explain that the U.S. was using `every legal weapon to fight terrorism.'" La Croix heads its report "Human Rights - CIA Rendition Flights Shake Europe." For France Soir "Condi Shows No Regrets." A regional editorialist comments: "The Europeans are much less outraged than they pretend to be: they fear, without saying it, that the U.S. might lose `its' war." (See Part C) La Croix interviews former CIA agent Robert Baer who contends: "The fact that the U.S. is not denying the information is confirmation enough for me. NATO bases were used for the transfer of prisoners. The CIA does not need the permission of local governments to use NATO bases. Certain European nations have looked the other way. After 9/11 and the arrests made in Afghanistan, no one had the political maturity to think about the long term consequences, such as violation of the Geneva Conventions or the impact on transatlantic relationships." All news outlets report on the kidnapped Frenchman in Baghdad and Liberation comments: "The recent increase in kidnappings appears to be related to the impending legislative elections in Iraq." Le Figaro reports on Defense Minister Alliot-Marie's weekend visit to the Gulf and her "support for a European defense" in a region where "U.S. military presence is strong." "What she intimated in essence is that nowhere should there be `private hunting grounds' in matters of security." (See Part C) (C) SUPPORTING TEXT/BLOCK QUOTES: Secretary Rice to Europe - Allegations About CIA Rendition SIPDIS Flights "The Forgotten CIA Flights" Jean-Claude Kieffer in regional Les Dernieres Nouvelles d'Alsace (12/06): "Cooperating with Washington in the fight against terrorism is natural for European capitals. But for Europe to serve, unknowingly, as an airport hub for `activities' related to the war in Iraq, is not. Even Washington's unconditional allies were `surprised' by the comings and goings of CIA planes that landed in NATO countries with God only knows what human cargo. Secretary of State Rice must provide some sort of explanation during her European tour. She will remain evasive, because for the Americans the war against terrorism has merged with the war in Iraq. And as Rice suggested, when faced with an implacable enemy, we need to free ourselves from certain rules in order to `save lives.' The Europeans are much less outraged than they pretend to be: they fear, without saying it, that the U.S. might lose `its' war." "Condi Under Pressure in Europe" Eric Lesser in left-of-center Le Monde (12/06): "The trip is shaping up as a difficult one because European leaders are expecting the Secretary to clarify things about CIA `secret prisons'. While several European nations have asked for clarification, the State Department is working on a written answer to the questions raised by Jack Straw. We must not expect a `mea culpa.' In fact Secretary Rice will probably ask European nations to `play things down' and to `shoulder their responsibilities.' Secretary Rice expects to have a difficult trip but she will reaffirm that the U.S. respects every nation's sovereignty. While she claims to want to improve relations with Europe, Rice has no intention of questioning practices considered to be `unorthodox.'" "Condi With No Regrets" Maxime Weigert in right-of-center France Soir (12/06): "Angela Merkel will probably not raise the question of rendition flights because the German government refuses to put pressure on an ally in whom `it trusts completely.' Yet tension is at its highest. Europe wants an explanation. and clarification about illegal practices that might have been committed in several European countries. including France. The situation is fast becoming embarrassing for Washington. Before leaving, Secretary Rice practiced her line of defense. She did not deny SIPDIS the existence of CIA flights nor did she apologize for them. She did however mention the `difficult choices' facing democracies and asked `whether governments wanted to work with the U.S. to protect their own countries from future terrorist acts.' Rice is reversing the situation and using fear as an alibi when she says `that renditions save lives.' In short, the U.S. is being benevolent. But with such arguments, why did the U.S. not ask for permission to land?" "Rice Asks Europe to Shoulder Its Responsibilities" Philippe Gelie in right-of-center Le Figaro (12/06): "Before departing, Secretary Rice dealt with the criticism over rendition flights. She did not acknowledge the existence of CIA `black sites' but she defended the question of `renditions' as legal practices used by European governments themselves, such as France in the Carlos case. Secretary Rice is forcing European nations to choose sides. This will be the extent of the `clarification' to the questions raised by the Europeans. Washington claims `it can do no more' and suggests European publics should be `more realistic' about what needs to be done when dealing with enemies such as Al-Qaeda." "CIA Secret Prisons: Rice to Explain" Pascal Riche in left-of-center Liberation (12/06): "A controversy is awaiting Secretary Rice as she gets off the plane in Europe. After a prolonged silence, Secretary Rice decided to speak up yesterday just before getting on the plane, but not to apologize. On the contrary, she read a firm statement. to remind European governments cooperating with Washington in the fight against terrorism to shoulder their responsibilities. `Renditions' have been practiced `for decades by the U.S. and other countries.' Rice emphasized that `renditions' saved lives in Europe. She did not explicitly confirm the existence of secret prisons in Eastern Europe and invited governments to share in her discretion. As a line of defense Washington is sticking to its guns. As a European diplomat said, `our American counterparts were taken by surprise by the magnitude of the reaction in the media and are asking us, in essence, to stop bothering them with this and shoulder our responsibilities.'" European Defense "France Praises EU Defense In Bahrain" Arnaud Girard in right-of-center Le Figaro (12/06): "Over the weekend, France's Defense Minister spoke in favor of re- enforcing the strategic relationship with a region where American military presence is strong. Even where geo-strategic and energy ambitions are high, Alliot-Marie insisted that there should be no `private hunting grounds' in matters of security.. She called for a strong strategic relationship between Europe and Arab nations in the Gulf. Speaking about a `new phase,' she suggested the need for a dialogue from pole to pole and the need for a regional security architecture, giving the OSCE as an example. In Qatar Alliot-Marie was more comfortable than in Bahrain because of the privileged relationship it has with France, which allows Qatar to reduce its strategic dependency on the U.S." STAPLETON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04