US embassy cable - 05PARIS8246

Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.

FRENCH REACTION TO E.O. 13382 DESIGNATIONS

Identifier: 05PARIS8246
Wikileaks: View 05PARIS8246 at Wikileaks.org
Origin: Embassy Paris
Created: 2005-12-05 17:18:00
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Tags: PREL PTER PARM KTFN FR
Redacted: This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 008246 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EUR/WE, EB/ESC/TFS FOR JEAN CLARK 
S/CT FOR TODD KUSHNER 
INL/C/CP FOR STEVEN PETERSON 
TREASURY FOR ADAM SZUBIN /OFAC FOR PAUL LURIE 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/05/2015 
TAGS: PREL, PTER, PARM, KTFN, FR 
SUBJECT: FRENCH REACTION TO E.O. 13382 DESIGNATIONS 
 
REF: SECSTATE 214780 
 
Classified By: Econ Counselor Ken Merten for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 
 
 1. (C)  We delivered ref points to the Asset-Freezing 
Directorate in the Ministry of Economy.  We spoke with 
Vincent Guitton, Head of the Services, Investment and IPR 
Division in the Ministry of Economy, who took note of the 
information but expressed skepticism that France could do 
anything about it, as France lacks any authority to block 
assets on WMD trafficking grounds. 
 
2. (C)  We requested information, per reftel, about laws and 
regulations that France has to combat WMD proliferation 
financing or enabling it to freeze assets of suspected WMD 
proliferators.  We noted France,s proposed new 
anti-terrorist legislation (due to become law in about a 
month), which will in its relevant part grant explicit 
national authority to freeze terrorist assets.  We asked 
whether France could use that new law to freeze assets of WMD 
traffickers.  Guitton said probably not, as the law is very 
specifically written for anti-terrorism activities.  We asked 
whether the proposed law could be amended to cover WMD 
traffickers, but Guitton said it is too late in the French 
process.  The French government has broad powers to propose 
legislation, but proposed laws go through a rigid review 
process that normally precludes significant amendments 
between introduction and passage.  A new law would be 
required, which would take several months at the least.  We 
noted that the proposed new law envisions implementation by 
administrative decree, and asked if the decree could be 
written in a way to include WMD traffickers.   Guitton 
thought that might be possible.  Although the legal basis is 
shakier, one could make an argument that since WMD could be 
used for terrorists, ends, asset freezing would be 
justifiable.  Guitton promised to review the possibility with 
the Ministry,s legal staff. 
Please visit Paris' Classified Website at: 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/paris/index.c fm 
 
Stapleton 

Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04