Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ANKARA7096 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ANKARA7096 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2005-12-02 14:14:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | CY PREL TU UN Cyprus |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 007096 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/02/2015 TAGS: CY, PREL, TU, UN, Cyprus SUBJECT: TURKEY PREPARING PORTS/AIRPORTS PROPOSAL FOR UN (U) Classified by CDA Nancy McEldowney, E.O. 12958, reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 1. (U) This is an action request - see paragraph 8. 2. (C) Summary: The Turkish MFA is preparing to give the UN a modestly more detailed version of FM Gul,s May proposal to open Turkish and northern Cypriot ports and airports. The Turks want the UN to broker agreement and implementation and, if successful, follow this with talks on comprehensive settlement. The MFA called in CDA December 1 to explain the proposal, and solicit USG ideas and support. This is the first glimmer that some in the MFA understand that Turkey can no longer rest on its 2004 initiative and needs to return to the "one step ahead" policy. We suggest working with the UK to help the Turks make this into something the UN can consider. End Summary. Draft Plan ---------- 3. (C) MFA Deputy U/S Apakan called in Charge December 1 to explain a draft plan representing what appears to be a modestly more detailed version of FM Gul,s May proposal to open all Turkish and Cypriot ports and airports. The plan is still in draft, the MFA did not give us a copy, and Apakan asked us to keep the proposal strictly confidential. Turkey,s UN PermRep does not yet have it, Apakan explained. On December 2, Northeastern Mediterranean Affairs DDG Bilman told us that UK Ambassador Westmacott also knows about it. 4. (C) Apakan explained the proposal as follows: -- Turkey opens its ports to ROC vessels. -- Turkey opens airports to ROC aircraft and allows ROC overflights of Turkey. -- The ROC allows ports in northern Cyprus to open under Turkish Cypriot administration, in conjunction with the UN, EU and IMO. -- The ROC allows Ercan Airport to open under Turkish Cypriot administration, in conjunction with the UN, ICAO and Eurocontrol. -- North Cyprus is included in the EU Customs Union. -- Turkish Cypriots are allowed to participate in international sports, cultural and other events. -- All steps are taken without prejudice to any of the parties, legal positions. (Comment: Meaning they neither constitute Turkish recognition of the ROC nor others' recognition of the "TRNC." End Comment.) -- By March 2006, the UNSYG calls a meeting to finalize an action plan to implement the proposal. -- If the plan is implemented, by the end of 2006, Turkish and Greek Cypriots meet under UN auspices to seek a way forward on comprehensive settlement. 5. (C) Apakan said Turkey hopes opening all ports and airports would be a "transitional phase" to comprehensive settlement. The Turkish UN PermRep will present the proposal to the UN Secretariat in a week to ten days. Apakan requested the USG's "advice and public support" for the initiative. 6. (C) CDA welcomed the MFA decision to take an initiative, but urged Apakan to think more about how to make the proposal attractive to the Greek Cypriot side, which is certain to argue the proposal only represents steps Turkey would have to take in any event for EU accession. CDA also urged Apakan to think carefully about how the plan could be sequenced. 7. (C) On December 2, MFA Northeastern Mediterranean DDG Bilman told Deputy Political Counselor that the Turkish side has little room to add more elements to the plan. He said the proposal had been drafted with input from several Turkish overseas ambassadors and with domestic input (NFI). According to Bilman, "some domestic circles" see the plan as "far-fetched." 8. (C) Comment and Action Request: This is the first glimmer we have seen, albeit modest, that some in the MFA think Turkey can no longer rest on what it did in 2004 and are ready to resume a "one step ahead" policy. We, with the UK, should encourage this approach. We request guidance from the Department about how we can respond to the MFA request for support, and suggestions about additional details needed to make this more workable and realistic. End Comment and Action Request. MCELDOWNEY
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04