Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05QUITO2729 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05QUITO2729 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Quito |
| Created: | 2005-12-01 15:26:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | SENV EAID EFIS ECON PGOV EC |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 QUITO 002729 SIPDIS DEPT PASS TO USAID E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: SENV, EAID, EFIS, ECON, PGOV, EC SUBJECT: GALAPAGOS TOURISM GROWTH A DELICATE BALANCE 1. Summary: Plans to expand tourism opportunities on the Galapagos island of Isabella are creating new economic alternatives for local fishing communities but raising the worst fears of conservationists. On November 10-12, a well- received USAID-led ecotourism project on Isabella brought together multiple actors to explore local-based tourism opportunities. The workshop coincided with the announcement of local infrastructure projects geared toward facilitating tourism. Meanwhile, environmentalists and NGOs who decry the disorder of the tourism sector claim that tourism growth on Isabella cannot be contained and that the goal of sustainable development that the workshop seeks is unattainable. Weak government institutions and historically poor relationships among involved parties will make establishing and maintaining a balance between conservation efforts and the economic needs of the local population difficult. End Summary. ECOTOURISM PLANS UNDERWAY FOR ISABELLA -------------------------------------- 2. Held on November 10-12 in the Isabella town of Puerto Villamil, a USAID-sponsored workshop identified technical assistance and training needs to allow the Isabella community to develop local tourist services. The goal is to strike a balance between the economic necessities of the local population and conservation. In developing sustainable economic alternatives for the islanders, workshop participants hope to help the island tap into the lucrative tourism market while holding large-scale development at bay. Actors from all sectors, including GOE officials, members of the local business community, international donors, a TAME airline representative, and representatives from the tourism and conservation sectors, attended the event. 3. The workshop resulted in a number of commitments from USAID. USAID's SALTO program that implements economic opportunity projects will provide technical assistance to help create a chamber of tourism for Isabella, develop a local tourist agency, and improve the quality of local tourism services. USAID, in conjunction with the Quito Chamber of Commerce Cooperative (CCQ), also will work to expand micro-financing on the island by providing training to small businesses and establishing a branch office of CCQ in Puerto Villamil. Meanwhile, INGALA, the GOE entity responsible for controlling immigration and the introduction of invasive species to the islands, pledged to support these efforts by further developing a tourism strategy and an investment policy for the island. LOCAL GOVERNMENT FACILITATES GROWTH ----------------------------------- 4. During the workshop, Pablo Gordillo, the Mayor of Isabella, presented four infrastructure activities to support the tourism effort on Isabella. The largest of these projects is the construction of an airport terminal. Financing for the terminal, estimated at $443 million, is nearly complete. A second construction project includes the building of a small pier to facilitate water-based tourism activities. USAID is supporting this project. Two other projects -- a $1.2 million sewage system and a municipal school -- have yet to receive financing. MANY TO BENEFIT FROM TOURISM EXPANSION -------------------------------------- 5. The Puerto Villamil population, many of whom are fishermen whose traditional catches are nearly commercially extinct, considered the workshop an historic event. The community on Isabella has been seeking to benefit from the Galapagos tourism market that thus far has favored large mainland tour agencies and the other two main inhabited islands in the Galapagos, Santa Cruz and San Cristobal. The workshop, along with the accompanying infrastructure projects, was an important first step in this direction. Mainland investors who have purchased land in Isabella with the hope that tourism will take off there also are poised to benefit from the plans. 6. For a number of those present at the workshop, TAME, the national airline who has been granted permission to fly directly from the mainland to Isabella, was one of the big winners. Although quiet during the workshop, the TAME representative met actively on the side with local hotel owners. TAME reportedly made agreements with local hotels to reserve blocks of seats on flights and discussed joint internet advertising opportunities. Infrastructure development in Puerto Villamil also will expand opportunities in the Galapagos for big tourist boats, both as a point of departure for tourists arriving from the mainland and as a stop on the ships' itineraries. ENVIRONMENTALIST FEARS REALIZED ------------------------------- 7. On the other side of the coin, environmentalists and NGOs fear that the tourism sector will undermine the balance between conservation and economic development on Isabella. CEDENMA, which represents over 60 Ecuadorian environmental NGOs, responded to the workshop with a press release that decried the current development plan for Isabella, claiming that any economic benefits will be captured by tourism interests from the mainland and never reach its intended target, the local population. Past history -- from 1999 until 2003, three out of every four tourism dollars went to mainland tour agencies and not Galapagos-based businesses -- suggests they might be correct. 8. Like many environmentalists, CEDENMA also believes that the development of tourism on Isabella runs the risk of introducing non-native species, destroying the delicate ecological balance of the island, and increasing the incentives for mainland Ecuadorians to immigrate to the islands. They are concerned that GOE institutions in charge of immigration and invasive species control are too weak to manage the process effectively. 9. In addition, environmentalists point out that many of the mainland investors who have purchased land on Isabella with expectations that tourism services will be expanded are politically well-connected and can influence the policy- making process to undermine effective control of the local, small-scale tourism projects that the workshop is promoting. This is consistent with ongoing conservationists' fears that once again, plans to develop local economic alternatives not only will damage the delicate environmental balance on the islands, they also will end up benefiting large, mainland- based interests and bypass entirely the population that the plans were intended to help. 10. Participants at the November 10-12 workshop sought to address some of these concerns. For example, they discussed oversight plans to limit big boat access to Puerto Villamil, noting that the Galapagos National Park (GNP)has the final say on itinerary changes for boats. With respect to the airport, they point out that the infrastructure project only focuses on the terminal building, not runway expansion. COMMENT ------- 11. The goal of sustainable economic development through tourism on Isabella will be difficult to attain. The mainland tourism sector will use its political and economic power to take full advantage of the situation. In addition, the conservationist sector historically has had little engagement with the local municipalities, the fishermen or the mainland tourism sector, making productive dialogue difficult. Moreover, weak institutions undermine the GOE's ability to take the lead on development in the Galapagos, allowing for unilateral decisions by those with economic and political clout. Finally, there is an inherent contradiction in all development plans for Galapagos. While improving the lives of residents of the islands must be at the core of any such plans, doing so will create even greater incentives for immigration, the most serious threat to the fragile ecosystems. BROWN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04