US embassy cable - 05KATHMANDU2649

Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.

SUPREME COURT: PASSPORTS TO WOMEN WITHOUT DISCRIMINATION

Identifier: 05KATHMANDU2649
Wikileaks: View 05KATHMANDU2649 at Wikileaks.org
Origin: Embassy Kathmandu
Created: 2005-11-30 09:13:00
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Tags: PHUM KWMN PGOV NP
Redacted: This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks.
VZCZCXYZ0004
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHKT #2649 3340913
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 300913Z NOV 05
FM AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9334
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 3712
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 3406
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 8865
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 1044
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L KATHMANDU 002649 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR SA/INS 
NSC FOR RICHELSOPH 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/30/2015 
TAGS: PHUM, KWMN, PGOV, NP 
SUBJECT: SUPREME COURT: PASSPORTS TO WOMEN WITHOUT 
DISCRIMINATION 
 
REF: KATHMANDU 2077 
 
Classified By: Charge Elisabeth Millard. Reasons 1.4 (b/d). 
 
Supreme Court:  Issue Passports Without Discrimination 
--------------------------------------------- --------- 
 
1. (U) On November 28, in a landmark decision, the Supreme 
Court directed the government to issue passports to women 
under 35 years of age, without requiring consent of their 
guardians.  Two female petitioners challenged the Cabinet 
decision of 1995, which barred government authorities from 
issuing passports to women under 35 years of age without 
consent of their parents in the case of unmarried women, and 
husband in the case of married women.  Terming the provision 
discriminatory against women, the Court instructed the 
government not to impose any such restrictions against women 
who wanted to obtain passports.  The bench cited Article 12 
(2) of the Constitution which guarantees certain fundamental 
rights to the people, the 1948 Universal Declaration, and the 
1966 Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 
 
Activists Welcome Ruling 
------------------------ 
 
2. (SBU) A November 30 editorial in the English language 
daily Kathmandu Post entitled "Empowering Women" hailed the 
Supreme Court's decision as "highly significant" for women's 
rights.  It explained that although the government had 
enacted the restriction to deter large-scale human 
trafficking to brothels, the concern "must be properly 
addressed but not by denying equal rights to women."  It 
noted that though the ruling would ease Nepali women's fight 
for their rights, "it is at the social level that the fight 
has to be carried on and it is here that the ruling could 
help the crusaders convince the society to become more 
liberal and accept the needs of the times."  Sapana Malla, 
head of local NGO Forum for Women and Law, told Emboff that 
the ruling was "very positive news."  She noted that the law 
had been very discriminatory.  Dunga Ghimire of ABC Nepal, a 
local women's rights NGO, was also pleased with the decision. 
 She told Emboff "I am proud that my daughter can now apply 
on her own for a passport as she goes for further studies in 
the U.K." 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
3.  (C) This Supreme Court verdict follows a ruling in 
September (reftel) ensuring citizenship rights to children 
born of single mothers.  The Supreme Court is working to 
address long-standing societal inequalities and grievances 
that the Maoists have exploited in their recruiting efforts. 
MILLARD 

Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04