Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05KATHMANDU2649 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05KATHMANDU2649 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Kathmandu |
| Created: | 2005-11-30 09:13:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PHUM KWMN PGOV NP |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
VZCZCXYZ0004 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHKT #2649 3340913 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 300913Z NOV 05 FM AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9334 INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 3712 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 3406 RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 8865 RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 1044 RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L KATHMANDU 002649 SIPDIS SIPDIS DEPT FOR SA/INS NSC FOR RICHELSOPH E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/30/2015 TAGS: PHUM, KWMN, PGOV, NP SUBJECT: SUPREME COURT: PASSPORTS TO WOMEN WITHOUT DISCRIMINATION REF: KATHMANDU 2077 Classified By: Charge Elisabeth Millard. Reasons 1.4 (b/d). Supreme Court: Issue Passports Without Discrimination --------------------------------------------- --------- 1. (U) On November 28, in a landmark decision, the Supreme Court directed the government to issue passports to women under 35 years of age, without requiring consent of their guardians. Two female petitioners challenged the Cabinet decision of 1995, which barred government authorities from issuing passports to women under 35 years of age without consent of their parents in the case of unmarried women, and husband in the case of married women. Terming the provision discriminatory against women, the Court instructed the government not to impose any such restrictions against women who wanted to obtain passports. The bench cited Article 12 (2) of the Constitution which guarantees certain fundamental rights to the people, the 1948 Universal Declaration, and the 1966 Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Activists Welcome Ruling ------------------------ 2. (SBU) A November 30 editorial in the English language daily Kathmandu Post entitled "Empowering Women" hailed the Supreme Court's decision as "highly significant" for women's rights. It explained that although the government had enacted the restriction to deter large-scale human trafficking to brothels, the concern "must be properly addressed but not by denying equal rights to women." It noted that though the ruling would ease Nepali women's fight for their rights, "it is at the social level that the fight has to be carried on and it is here that the ruling could help the crusaders convince the society to become more liberal and accept the needs of the times." Sapana Malla, head of local NGO Forum for Women and Law, told Emboff that the ruling was "very positive news." She noted that the law had been very discriminatory. Dunga Ghimire of ABC Nepal, a local women's rights NGO, was also pleased with the decision. She told Emboff "I am proud that my daughter can now apply on her own for a passport as she goes for further studies in the U.K." Comment ------- 3. (C) This Supreme Court verdict follows a ruling in September (reftel) ensuring citizenship rights to children born of single mothers. The Supreme Court is working to address long-standing societal inequalities and grievances that the Maoists have exploited in their recruiting efforts. MILLARD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04