Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05TELAVIV6580 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05TELAVIV6580 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Tel Aviv |
| Created: | 2005-11-21 12:08:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV PREL KWBG PTER IS ELECTIONS 2006 GOI INTERNAL COUNTERTERRORISM GOI EXTERNAL ISRAELI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TEL AVIV 006580 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/18/2015 TAGS: PGOV, PREL, KWBG, PTER, IS, ELECTIONS 2006, GOI INTERNAL, COUNTERTERRORISM, GOI EXTERNAL, ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN AFFAIRS SUBJECT: LIVNI PONDERS LIKUD INTERNAL POLITICS AND HAMAS' PARTICIPATION IN PLC VOTE REF: TEL AVIV 6357 Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Gene A. Cretz for Reasons 1.4 (b ) and (d) 1, (C) Summary: Minister of Justice Tzipi Livni told Deputy Assistance Secretary Robert Danin on November 18 that Prime Minister Sharon was playing his cards very close to his vest and that nobody knew if he planned to establish a new centrist party. She acknowledged that Likud's core ideology was no longer clear, and asserted that the common denominator among members of the Likud leadership now is moderation, though openly promoting moderate positions is politically risky. She suggested that if Sharon established a new party, newly elected Labor Party Chairman Peretz would find it easier to form a coalition with it. Livni, however, questioned whether there would be sufficient time for a new party to prepare for elections and whether it could survive in the long-term. An ideological discussion must take place within Likud, whether or not Sharon leaves, she said. Livni asserted that, while Peretz's victory over Shimon Peres has made the differences between Likud and Labor more pronounced, Israeli voters see integrity and leadership abilities in their candidates as more important. In the upcoming elections, she suggested that Likud would try to define itself as a better representative of "authentic Jewish values." Livni also expressed considerable concern about the upcoming Palestinian Legislative elections and the prospects of Hamas and other terrorist organizations participation. End Summary. ------------------------ Will Sharon Leave Likud? ------------------------ 2. (C) In her November 18 meeting with DAS Danin, Minister of Justice Livni volunteered that she does not know for certain whether the divisions within the Likud would ultimately prompt PM Sharon to leave Likud and establish a new centrist party. (Note: On November 21 Sharon announced he was leaving Likud. See septel.) She suggested that the Labor Party, under its newly elected Chairman Amir Peretz, may be open to establishing a coalition with a new centrist party. The National Religious Party (NRP) and Shinui may also be potential coalition partners. 3. (C) Livni said it was also unclear if a new party would have sufficient time to prepare for the next elections, which could occur as early as March 2006. She advised that organizing financing could also be another obstacle, as the GOI funds parties based on their representation in the Knesset. A new party would have no Knesset members. Livni, however, added that if Likud MKs move to the new party, their seats could be counted in favor of a proportionate funding allocation to the new party. She said that if 14-15 seats shift to the new party, associated funding could flow to that party without anything even being known about its platform. 4. (C) In response to DAS Danin's observation that newly-formed Israeli centrist parties historically do well in their first election but then quickly fade in subsequent years, Livni acknowledged that this was a legitimate concern for Likud members contemplating a break, particularly those hoping for a longer-term political future. Sharon could lead them to victory, but who leads the party later "is not Sharon's concern." The question for others is "what happens the day after?" In Israeli politics, the integrity and leadership abilities of the candidate attract more votes than any given political platform, said Livni, somewhat hopefully. She did not suggest who might best fill Sharon's shoes in the future. -------------------------- What Does Likud Stand For? -------------------------- 5. (C) Livni advised that, whether Sharon leaves Likud or not, there will be an ideological debate within the party. In response to Danin's question on what Likud stands for, Livni shrugged and said she had recently asked Likud members of the Knesset the same question but the replies fell short. She suggested that an assertion that Peretz is on the extreme left and Likud is not, says little about the party. She joked that in the past any Likud platform position had to start with the word "no," such as "no establishment of a Palestinian State." However, "this is not a vision," according to Livni. 6. (C) Livni asserted that the party membership had to decide if it could accept a leader who would "take them to a different place." She explained that, although some refuse to accept change, moderation is the common denominator within Likud. For example, most members accept that the land must be divided to secure peace with the Palestinians and security for Israel. However, in the current environment, many moderates refrain from participating in debates "for political reasons," choosing to remain silent. 7. (C) Livni suggested that a huge difference between Likud and Labor on core issues need not exist because voters will elect the candidate they feel provides the best future leadership in proceeding along the right path. With Peretz's victory, the distinctions between Likud and Labor are better defined but, at the end of the day, little attention is paid to the differences in positions. Livni said that over time Labor went from a socialist party to one, under Barak, promoting free market initiatives. She added, however, that Peretz may take Labor back to a more socialist orientation. 9. (C) A possible outcome of a Likud internal debate, according to Livni, will probably include presenting the party as the one that best represents the interests of Israel as a "Jewish and democratic state." Internal values and integrity should be given the same attention as foreign affairs, she said. ----- Hamas ----- 10. (C) Livni raised the issue of the upcoming Palestinian Legislative Elections and Hamas, participation. She said that she and other Israelis could not understand America,s position, which she suggested indicated that it was alright for armed terrorist groups to run as legitimate political parties. Danin explained the difficulty of this issue from a policy perspective, explaining that we consider Hamas to be a terrorist organization, but that we believed that the Palestinians must produce a solution within their political context. Livni suggested that it would be much easier for the Palestinians to take strong positions on Hamas if the international community were to stake out a strong position now, rather than wait until after the elections. Livni said that if anything, President Abbas will be in a weaker position to take on Hamas, since they and other groups, such as Islamic Jihad, will be validated and legitimated by their participation in the elections. 11. (C) COMMENT: Livni comes from a long-time Likud famly, and was raised on the Revisionist ideology that claimed all of the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean as Israel,s birthright. While she has been one of the first to recognize the need for Likud to abandon this core ideology, she is still struggling to define what will replace it. Having strongly supported Prime Minister Sharon,s disengagement initiative, she likely has no place to go other than with him to his new centrist party. Though she, like other Likud stalwarts now in their fifties, recognizes that she may be consigning herself to long-term political oblivion by doing so if the new party fails to outlast Sharon. Her repeated concerns about the international community,s approach to Hamas, participation in PLC elections, is echoed by many other officials close to Sharon, who worry that the U.S. may be softening its overall position in the global war on terror. ********************************************* ******************** Visit Embassy Tel Aviv's Classified Website: http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/nea/telaviv You can also access this site through the State Department's Classified SIPRNET website. ********************************************* ******************** JONES
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04