Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BRATISLAVA926 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BRATISLAVA926 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bratislava |
| Created: | 2005-11-18 19:33:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL ETRD EU LO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 181933Z Nov 05
C O N F I D E N T I A L BRATISLAVA 000926 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/18/2015 TAGS: PREL, ETRD, EU, LO SUBJECT: SLOVAK VIEWS ON NOVEMBER 21 GAERC REF: STATE 208899 Classified By: CDA Lawrence R. Silverman for reasons 1.4 (b) ad (d). 1. (SBU) Polec Chief met with European Correspondent Lubomir Rehak November 16 to discuss points provided reftel on agenda items at the November 21 GAERC. 2. (SBU) DEFENSE ISSUES: Rehak noted that 19 states are members of both NATO and the EU, and it was in all their interests to improve cooperation. 3. (C) IRAQ: Slovakia agrees with the U.S. on Iraq policy. Rehak explained the reason that Slovakia has not forgiven the bulk of its debt to Iraq as an accounting problem. Slovakia is willing to meet the Paris Club goal of 80 percent debt reduction, but because of the way the debt is recorded, the Finance Ministry can forgive "all or nothing" of the commercial debt. The amount isn't particularly high (approximately 25 million dollars) but forgiving the total also creates problems with Slovak statistics for the OECD, as they would show an artificial increase one year and then a sharp drop-off the next. The finance ministry is not opposed to the debt forgiveness in principle, but has not found a solution to the accounting problem that will not affect election year budgets and euro aspirations. 4. (C) MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS: Rehak said the EU still has financial and security concerns about the Rafah border crossing. Nonetheless, Slovakia is planning to contribute one or two policemen to the Rafah mission. Regarding January elections, the GAERC conclusions will call on Israel to create the proper conditions for holding elections in the occupied territories including East Jerusalem. 5. (C) UKRAINE/BELARUS/RUSSIA: Rehak expressed surprise that the U.S. was critical of the recent high-level contact between Ukraine and Belarus. His impression was that there was general agreement to use Ukraine as a conduit for communicating with the Lukashenko government. Poloff mentioned the possibility of a joint U.S.-EU approach to Lukashenko. This led to a side discussion of Prime Minister Dzurinda's personal views. Dzurinda has had no contact with Lukashenko, and "does not like dictators." Rehak said Dzurinda went to Russia for the first time after six years as Prime Minister, and refuses to go to China despite repeated appeals by the Slovak ambassador in Beijing for improving trade. Rehak said Dzurinda has no "above-standard" contacts with Putin, although in Rehak's personal view Dzurinda could be closer in order to influence the Russian elite. Slovakia is a small country which Russia does not view as threatening, and although Slovaks do not have fond memories of Russian intervention in 1968, they do not have negative people-to-people relations. 6. (C) UKRAINE: Rehak emphasized that rule of law principles were critical in Ukraine. He said Slovakia has been arguing within the EU that it is unrealistic to expect radical steps at reform in Ukraine before parliamentary elections, or else the reform-minded politicians will lose the elections. Ukraine needs to indicate some progress in democratization and economic reform, but sensitive social issues can't be dealt with before the elections. Slovakia will also try to persuade EU partners to mention a "European perspective" at the December 1 EU-Ukraine summit. Many member states are completely opposed to even mentioning the possibility of membership; but in Slovakia's view the possibility of membership "someday" will be a big impetus for Ukraine to stay the course. 7. (C) BOSNIA: Rehak said Slovakia was well aware of the U.S. role in Bosnia and supports it. The GAERC conclusions will be "very good and very complex." Slovakia had problems with wording calling for national minorities' rights. Because of possible misinterpretations by the Hungarian minority here, Slovakia preferred language calling for "rights of the persons belonging to national minorities," according rights to individuals rather than groups. However, Slovakia will express its concerns with this technical issue to partners without blocking the final text. 8. (C) KOSOVO: Rehak said that Slovakia has been trying to explain to EU partners how difficult the final status talks will be for Serbia. He compared it to asking the U.S. to cede New Mexico to Mexico to show "compromise." Many EU countries are unwilling to understand how difficult it is for the Serbs; there is a lack of sympathy. Rehak said UNSC membership will be a huge challenge for Slovakia with regards to the Western Balkans, and Slovakia risks deteriorating relations with both Serbs and Albanians. 9. (C) SYRIA: Rehak was certain Slovakia will not meet with Syria on the margins of the Barcelona Summit, saying again, "Dzurinda doesn't like dictators." 10. (C) WTO: Slovakia's view is that it is not possible to open EU agricultural markets to developing countries without further liberalization of non-agricultural sectors. Rehak said Slovakia supports flexibility and a wide mandate for Mandleson to negotiate. SILVERMAN NNNN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04