Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05OTTAWA3400 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05OTTAWA3400 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ottawa |
| Created: | 2005-11-15 20:14:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL KNNP IR IZ |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 06 OTTAWA 003400 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/03/2015 TAGS: PREL, KNNP, IR, IZ SUBJECT: US-EU TROIKA CONSULTATIONS ON MIDDLE EAST REF: (A) OTTAWA 3283 (NOTAL) Classified By: POL M/C BRIAN FLORA. REASON 1.4 (B) AND (D). 1. (C) SUMMARY. On October 26 in Ottawa, NEA DAS Gordon Gray and a U.S. delegation exchanged views with EU Troika officials on developments in Iran and countries in the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership. Tri-lateral consultations with the EU and Canada on Iran are reported reftel. END SUMMARY. 2. (SBU) U.S. Participants: - Gordon Gray, NEA DAS - Jason Bruder, Iran desk officer - Roopa Rangaswamy, nuclear nonproliferation officer (ISN/RA) - Patricia Kim-Scott, Embassy polmil officer (notetaker) EU Commission Participants: - Julian Evans, UK Deputy High Commissioner for the Presidency - Peter Bainbridge, UK FCO - Patrick Laurent, European Commission - Bjorn Larsson, European Council Secretariat - Chris Kendall, EC Representative Ottawa - Martin Gaertner, Austrian Permanent Mission to the EU IRAN ---- 3. (C) UK Deputy H/C Evans briefly summarized the morning discussion about Iran (reftel/NOTAL), noting that the EU generally was on the same page as Canada. EU shared perceptions about what it could (and could not) do vis-a-vis Iran. As Chair of the IAEA Board of Governors, Canada was obliged to take a tougher line on Iran's nuclear activities but had been very supportive of EU efforts. 4. (C) Laurent stated that Western efforts to publicly isolate Iran merely served to whip up nationalistic fervor. The key to changing Iran's nuclear ambitions lay in the internal dynamics of the country. Evans said the challenge was getting Iran to engage constructively, as they seemed to be in permanent "transmit mode." 5. (C) Gray said the U.S. goal was to modify Iran's behavior. We want to avoid creating the impression that our policy differences with Iran are the result of U.S.-Iranian disagreements. India's IAEA vote helped shake the perception that these are first versus third world issues. U.S. PERSPECTIVE ON REFORM IN ARAB COUNTRIES -------------------------------------------- 6. (C) Drawing on his recent posting in Cairo, Gray shared insights into the progress of political reform in Egypt. The upcoming parliamentary elections would be a good indicator of the government's commitment to democratic reform; civil society was gaining confidence. Assistance from the West was still needed, particularly in areas such as electoral monitoring, and he encouraged EU involvement. 7. (C) Regarding Palestinian elections, Gray said Hamas participation was a key issue; it was difficult to envision a democratic process that included militias. Such groups would have to decide between engaging in the political process and continuing armed conflict. That being said, Hamas was unlikely to disarm by the January 26, election. 8. (C) Gray welcomed EU participation in and financial support for the Forum for the Future conference in Bahrain, November 11-12. He noted that cooperation among the U.S., EU and G-8 countries had been very good. 9. (C) As in the rest of the region, there were positive signs that democracy was taking root in Lebanon. Despite the legacy of civil war and the Syrian occupation, Lebanon seemed to be moving in the right direction in that the Lebanese had greater freedom to determine their future. EU COMMENTS ----------- 10. (C) Representing the incoming Austrian presidency, Gaertner said the EU broadly shared the U.S. view of developments in the region and thanked Gray for his on-the-ground perspective of progress in Egypt. At the same time, in ten years of trying to bring reform to the Mediterranean Arab world (the Barcelona process) it was dismaying to observe the continuing insistence of some governments on "non-interference in internal affairs." EU Presidency thinking on this was evolving, Gaertner said. Every country in the region had unique experiences and challenges in undertaking reform. Some cases turned out better than expected, such as Turkey. Europe's Christian democrat tradition was a model that could be adapted to a Muslim country to help steer reform. The risk of following "our" own agenda, he said, was another Algeria. 11. (C) In dealing with Islam, it was important to maintain a dialogue between civilizations in order to convey a vision of Islam in a pluralistic world. Conferences that promoted Christian-Islamic dialogue and dialogue among Jews, Christians and Muslims were an important tool to illustrate the benefits of "co-existence." 12. (C) The EU's efforts to promote economic reforms had produced mixed results. While countries in the MED dialogue complained about the lack of foreign direct investment (FDI) from Europe, they had failed to create the conditions on the ground to facilitate FDI. 13. (C) Alluding to the EU-Canadian discussion of Syria/Lebanon the previous day, Evans noted that while there was no "smoking gun" evidence in the Mehlis report on the Hariri assassination, there were interesting implications. The next move was up to Syria, he said. Evans flagged EU concern for Yemen as one of the poorest countries in the Middle East. The EU had held some discussions on drug trafficking and economic/social reforms but with mixed results. EURO-MEDITERRANEAN PARTNERSHIP ------------------------------ 14. (C) Peter Bainbridge provided a briefing on the Euro-Mediterranean partnership (Barcelona Process), the EU's main tool for outreach to the near Middle East and North Africa. In the ten years since the launch of the Barcelona Process, bilateral agreements had been made with a majority of the countries in the region to implement work plans in a number of areas, including education, economic reform, governance and migration. Nonetheless, illiteracy rates remained high, especially among women. The EU hoped to establish a governance fund from which monies would be allocated as Mediterranean countries met their targets; the approach might spur healthy competition among contenders. The Euro-Med electoral observer system had proved a useful tool to engage civil society. Bainbridge noted that in all its approaches, the EU increasingly sought to promote its image as a "player, not a payer." 15. (C) Bainbridge echoed Gray's assessment of positive change in Lebanon and the opportunity that is now before the Lebanese people. The European Neighborhood Policy Action Plan included incentives for undertaking reforms that hopefully would encourage the Lebanese government. MAGHREB REGION -------------- 16. (C) Laurent said that the "Basra Process" involving the countries of the Maghreb region was on track. He gave good marks to Morocco and Jordan, and a "relatively good" for Tunisia, noting that it was not up to par on human rights and governance. In Lebanon, there was a "resurgence" of difficulties in governance. Hopefully, the progress of Morocco and Jordan would serve as an accelerator in the region. 17. (C) The EU thought that Egypt was "playing" the Basra Process to avoid being driven to reforms; this manipulation put a damper on the speed of reforms. At the same time, however, Laurent agreed with Gray that the creation of "political space" in Egypt needed to be encouraged. The U.S. and EU differed in their respective approaches, Laurent observed, with the U.S. emphasizing change through civil society and the EU seeking to work both the government and civil society simultaneously. The EU had found that the Arab world was open to importing "technical" knowledge but remained closed to advances in human rights, particularly women's rights. 18. (C) Gray welcomed the EU's engagement of civil society in Egypt. The Egyptian diplomatic corps, for example, was "old school" and often out of touch with the leanings of its own government. As in the case of dealings with Iran, it was important to de-associate calls for reform from government efforts to label these as U.S. or U.K.-driven. It was important to diversify the voices calling for reform not only in Egypt, but the region as a whole. YEMEN ----- 19. (C) Gray said the USG shared EU concerns about Yemen. The Yemeni government aspired to taking the bilateral relationship to the next level, but the USG saw impediments, including a lack of consistency in its commitment to reform. While Yemeni cooperation on counter-terrorism was "not bad," it could be improved. The same was true of cooperation on eradication of SA/LW, where minimal progress had been achieved only after a great investment of time and effort. Yemen had a talent for calculating the minimum it needed to do in order to "skate." 20. (C) Laurent expressed the EU's disappointment in light of expectations regarding Yemen, at one time the only Arab country with a "germination" of democracy. Now the country was so fragile it risked becoming a failed state. It was not liked by the rest of the Arab world; in fact, the GCC countries "despised" Yemen. The EU planned to enhance its classic development assistance program to improve governance. IRAQ ---- 21. (C) Evans praised the positive referendum on Iraq's new constitution as the best result that could have been hoped for. Iraqi citizens were pleased about their autonomy and were now talking about ensuring that it would last. Canada had been a big help in this process, and Elections Canada director Pierre Kingsley was already working on the next round of elections. Financial assistance for Iraq remained crucial. The EU was a major donor, having contributed 200 million Euros to reconstruction and another 30 million Euros for parliamentary elections. Gray welcomed the EU's contributions to Iraq. 22. (C) Laurent expressed a less positive view of Iraq following his recent visit to Baghdad to advance the European Commission's eventual offices within the premises of the UK mission. Though matters were moving apace on the financial plan, bilateral activities had been delayed. It was regrettable that the security situation was not better. While the constitution had been voted, a number of political leaders were concerned that Iraq was too weak in the center. This imbalance contained the seeds of future discontent. The constitution had failed to achieve full inclusion of the Sunnis and thus polarized the country. Europe was worried about the increased degree of violence. In Iraq, everything was linked, from the political process to the constitution. There were conflicting signals on the Iraqi forces' ability to take their destiny into their own hands. The infiltration of the civil police by insurgents was disconcerting. Laurent sought U.S confirmation that some Iraqi army units were being reconfigured along sectarian lines. Gray said he was unaware that this was the case and would look into it. 23. (C) Gray noted the interconnection between security, political progress, and reconstruction. Training the Iraqi army was a critical element. Gray agreed that improving the security situation on the ground was crucial to reconstruction efforts. Being able to address the basic quality of life issues such as access to potable water, housing and schooling, would make a difference. 24. (C) At the same time, even the most optimistic observers could not have predicted the degree of progress achieved to date. The run-up to the October 15 vote was encouraging, with the number of predicted attacks off by two thirds. Roughly fifty per cent of the electorate turned out for the elections in January. Gray recommended to his EU interlocutors Secretary Rice's testimony of October 19 which both SIPDIS supporters and detractors had said provided a clear and articulate vision of the Administration's policy in Iraq. 25. (C) Evans agreed that statistics demonstrated impressive progress in Iraq. The picture on reconstruction was much better than one might be led to believe from the media. 26. (U) This cable has been cleared by DAS Gray. Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa WILKINS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04