Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05MINSK1383 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05MINSK1383 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Minsk |
| Created: | 2005-11-15 11:10:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | ECON EINV PGOV WTRO BO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
VZCZCXRO7282 RR RUEHDA RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN RUEHROV RUEHVK RUEHYG DE RUEHSK #1383/01 3191110 ZNR UUUUU ZZH R 151110Z NOV 05 FM AMEMBASSY MINSK TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3324 INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0274 RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 0747 RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE RUFOADA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MINSK 001383 SIPDIS SENSITIVE SIPDIS PASS USTR FOR ALLGEIER AND DWOSKIN EB/OT FOR CRAFT USDOC FOR ITA/JACOBS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: ECON, EINV, PGOV, WTRO, BO SUBJECT: Re-Nationalization of Industry Continues Ref: Minsk 955 1. (SBU) Summary: Reftel describes how the GOB has been using the Golden Share to nationalize a number of companies. Over the summer the GOB invoked the Golden Share to take temporary control of several firms. The GOB then ordered these companies to issue large numbers of severely undervalued shares and grant all the new shares to the GOB, thereby gaining a majority stake in each. In the past month the GOB has streamlined this process by getting several companies to give a majority stake to the GOB without the Golden Share being invoked. The GOB has taken control of several companies in the past month through this mechanism. Even though the GOB has found new means to further nationalize the economy while avoiding the infamous Golden Share, on October 19 Lukashenko signed a decree strengthening the government's powers under the Golden Share. End summary. The New, Improved Golden Share ------------------------------ 2. (SBU) On October 19, Lukashenko signed decree 486, strengthening the GOB's authority under the Golden Share. The decree states that henceforth any decisions made by the GOB after it has invoked the Golden Share are, "indisputable and not subject to appeal... irrespective of the established procedure of approving decisions." In other words, whatever the GOB says, goes, even if it violates the Golden Share law. 3. (SBU) The GOB created the Golden Share law in 1997 to allow the state to take over management of companies in certain circumstances. In 2004, Lukashenko issued a decree allowing the GOB to take over temporary management of any company in which the GOB at any time in the past owned even one share. Although the law states the Golden Share can only be used in certain circumstances (such as after a company fails to pay wages for three months, or is operating at a loss for six months), in practice the GOB has used the Golden Share to nationalize a number of companies who do not have such problems. The GOB uses the Golden Share to take over temporary management of the company, then orders the company to issue vast amounts of highly undervalued shares, and to give those shares to the GOB. Coercion as Effective as the Golden Share ----------------------------------------- 4. (SBU) The GOB has found ways to gain control of companies without using the Golden Share. On September 22, Lukashenko signed Presidential Decree 442, giving the GOB majority ownership of the Minsk Porcelain Plant. Previously, the state owned 9% of the plant, with the other 91% owned by 1,680 individuals (most likely plant employees). The decree ordered the plant to give 2,267,888 shares to the GOB and another 350,995 shares to Minsk city authorities. This gave the GOB 95% ownership of the company. These new shares were valued at BYR 500 [USD 23 cents] each. In exchange for these shares, the GOB agreed to reschedule the plant's debt and give the plant BYR 1.39 billion [USD 646,500] from the state budget to modernize. In his decree Lukashenko also ordered the plant to produce 2.7 million pieces of porcelain in 2005. 5. (SBU) On October 6, the GOB announced it was raising its stake in Kovry Bresta (Brest Carpets) from 0.003% to 99.73% in exchange for relief of BYR 15.694 billion [USD 7.3 million] in debt the company owed the GOB. The GOB forced the company to issue new shares worth BYR 130 [USD six cents]; previously its shares were worth BYR 80,000 [USD 37] and the company was owned by its 2,400 employees. 6. (SBU) On October 12, the GOB convinced shareholders at the Svetlogorsk paper mill to issue 1,447,525 new shares, valued at BYR 12,000 each [USD 5.58], and to surrender these new shares to the GOB. This raised the GOB's share in the paper mill from 47.23% to 75.95%. In exchange, the GOB promised to invest in modernizing the mill. This new emission of shares reduced the stake of the mill's other owners: Russian companies Damino Associates, Bushnell Co. and Iton Association had their shares drop from 14.04% to 6.4%, 13.92% to 6.3% and 11.61% to 5.3%, respectively. Individual shareholders saw their stake drop from 12.4% to 5.66%. MINSK 00001383 002 OF 002 7. (SBU) On October 20, Presidential Decree 482 gave Belarus' fourth largest bank, Belinvestbank, the status of an "investment bank" and ordered the bank to issue BYR 50 billion [USD 23.25 million] worth of new shares and give them to the GOB. The decree also instructed the GOB to give the bank USD 10 million a year for the next six years, and directed the bank to loan at least an additional USD 100 million to state investment projects during the same period. Before this decree, various GOB entities owned 84% of the bank, with the National Bank of Belarus owning 41.7%, and the Ministry of Economy and Belarusian State University each also owing major portions. After the BYR 50 billion in new shares, the GOB will own 92%. 8. (SBU) In January 2005, the GOB used the Golden Share to take temporary control of the company Mozyr Refinery Plus (MNPZ). MNPZ was created in 1995 when the Mozyr Oil Refinery was privatized. It has never been state owned, and therefore the Golden Share could not be legally used against MNPZ. MNPZ consists of 2,235 current refinery employees and 700 retirees, and owns 12.252% of the Mozyr Refinery (the GOB owns 42.757% and Russia's Slavneft owns 42.581%). After the GOB invoked the Golden Share against MNPZ, it tried to transfer 98% of the company to government ownership, claiming MNPZ owed the GOB USD 4.7 million. MNPZ asked permission to sell 4% of its shares, worth an estimated USD 5 million, to cover this debt, but the GOB (which manages the company since it used the Golden Share) refused. MNPZ members have repeatedly challenged the use of the Golden Share in court, claiming it was used illegally since the GOB never owned a single share of the company. In each case the court has refused to hear the case. If the GOB succeeds in taking over the company, it will control a majority of the Mozyr refinery. Golden Share Scares Away Investment ----------------------------------- 9. (SBU) On October 27, Econoff met with Frank ter Borg, Economic and Commercial Counselor for the Dutch Embassy in Warsaw (with jurisdiction over Belarus). Borg explained that recently an unnamed Dutch company had wanted to invest up to Euro 20 million in a production facility in Belarus. However, as the facility would have been built on land that was once a state-owned collective farm, the company asked the Belarusian MFA if that meant the Golden Share could be used to take control of the facility. The MFA never responded, so Borg said the Dutch firm decided not to invest in Belarus. Comment ------- 10. (SBU) Comment: The GOB continues to use the Golden Share and similar means to re-nationalize the few parts of the Belarusian economy that were privatized. In the immediate term this aggressive policy is boosting state revenues and promoting state social policies, such as full employment. However, such practices will further weaken the Belarusian economy by expanding the share of the economy ruled by state command, scaring off needed investment, and complicating Belarusian efforts to join the WTO. KROL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04