Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05YEREVAN1958 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05YEREVAN1958 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Yerevan |
| Created: | 2005-11-04 12:58:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PHUM PGOV AM |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 041258Z Nov 05
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 001958 SIPDIS DEPT FOR EUR/CACEN, DRL E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/04/2015 TAGS: PHUM, PGOV, AM SUBJECT: CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTIONS: JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES CONVICTED REF: A) YEREVAN 477 B) 04 YEREVAN 2545 Classified By: A/DCM Robin Phillips for reasons 1.4 (b,d). ------- SUMMARY ------- 1. (C) On November 4, a local-level court in Sevan convicted (and sentenced to three years imprisonment) four Jehovah's Witnesses (Armenian citizens) on charges of "absence without leave from a military unit or place of service." The court initially charged the Jehovah's Witnesses with "desertion by agreement," an act the men's attorney, Richard Daniel, told us is equivalent to mutiny and punishable by up to eight years imprisonment. The defendants maintained in court that they opted for alternative service, instead of imprisonment for draft evasion, assuming that the service would be independent of the military. European Association of Jehovah's Christian Witnesses Representative Paul Gillies called the convictions -- under military articles of the Armenian Criminal Code -- confirmation that the GOAM is not differentiating military and alternative civilian services. Gillies said he is in Armenia to document the cases for a complaint his association plans to file on behalf of Armenian conscientious objectors at the European Court of Human Rights. Fifteen other Jehovah's Witnesses are currently slated for prosecution under similar charges in early November. End Summary. --------------------------------------------- ----------- COURT CONVICTS JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES FOR ABANDONING DUTIES --------------------------------------------- ----------- 2. (SBU) On November 4, the Gegharkunik District Court of First Instance in Sevan convicted four Jehovah's Witnesses -- Artur Chilingarov, Gagik Davtyan, Vagarshak Margaryan and Boris Melkumyan -- on charges of "absence without leave by prior agreement," under Article 361(5) of the Armenian Criminal Code. The conviction carried a three year prison sentence. The court initially charged the Jehovah's Witnesses with "desertion by agreement," an act equivalent to mutiny and punishable by up to 8 years imprisonment, according to European Association of Jehovah's Christian Witnesses (EAJCW) Representative Paul Gillies and attorney Richard Daniel, who represented the men in court. --------------------------------------------- ------------- JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES CLAIM HARSH CONDITIONS, PHYSICAL ABUSE --------------------------------------------- ------------- 3. (SBU) According to EAJCW attorney Richard Daniel, nineteen-year-old Boris Melkumyan testified that military police frequently patrolled the Sevan-area psychiatric hospital where he and the three other Jehovah's Witnesses on trial worked. Melkumyan alleged that the hospital director Gagik Karabetyan, ordered him -- along with Chilingarov, Davtyan, and Margaryan -- to shovel snow "with their bare hands," to perform nursing duties for which they were untrained, and to remove a dead body from the women's section of the hospital. During the five months he worked at the hospital, Melkumyan claimed he was not permitted to leave the compound, and that Karabetyan frequently locked him -- and his fellow conscientious objectors -- out of their barracks, forcing them to stay outside overnight in harsh conditions. Gillies said that on May 18, when Karabetyan locked them out of their rooms again, the men left the hospital compound and notified military authorities that they would not return because the service "offended the Bible-based conscience of the young men." --------------------------------------------- ----------- ARMENIAN CRIMINAL CODE TOUGHER ON DESERTION THAN EVASION --------------------------------------------- ----------- 4. (C) Before the GOAM adopted the Law on Alternative Military Services in November 2004, most conscientious objectors opted to evade conscription. Under the Armenian Criminal Code, the punishment for evasion is one to two years imprisonment, about the length of military service for Armenian conscripts. With the passage of an alternative services law -- a law Gillies, Daniel and the four men convicted by the Sevan court say the GOAM is improperly administering -- many conscientious objectors accepted conscription, "believing they would serve in true civilian capacities." When forced to work under military supervision Gillies maintains, "the men were forced by conviction" to desert their service. Under the Armenian Criminal Code, the penalties for desertion -- anywhere from three to eight years -- are generally much higher than the penalties for draft evasion, generally one to two years. ------------------------------- COMMENT: MORE CASES ON THE WAY ------------------------------- 5. (C) From their perspectives, Chilingarov, Davtyan, Margaryan, and Melkumyan would have been better off rejecting alternative service (which carries a stiffer penalty for desertion) and opting instead to evade conscription all together. The Sevan convictions -- under military articles of the Armenian Criminal Code -- call into doubt the GOAM's commitment to establishing true alternative civilian services. Currently 24 Jehovah's Witnesses are serving prison sentences in Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh, with fifteen defendants in similar cases awaiting trials set for early November. Gillies and Daniel both told us that they are in Armenia to document a complaint against the GOAM they plan to file in the European Court of Human Rights. EVANS
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04