Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05DUBLIN1334 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05DUBLIN1334 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Dublin |
| Created: | 2005-10-27 15:51:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PARM KNNP IN EI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L DUBLIN 001334
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/31/2015
TAGS: PREL, PARM, KNNP, IN, EI
SUBJECT: IRELAND STILL NON-COMMITTAL ON U.S.-INDIA NUCLEAR
COOPERATION
REF: A. STATE 190856
B. DUBLIN 1152
Classified By: Political-Economic Counselor Mary E. Daly; Reasons 1.4 (
B) and (D).
1. (C) On October 26, Post delivered ref A demarche to
Therese Healy, Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) First
Secretary for Disarmament and Nonproliferation, who was an
SIPDIS
Irish delegate at the October 19-20 NSG Consultative Group
(CG) meeting in Vienna. Healy noted that the Irish
Government had not yet taken a position on proposed
U.S.-India civil nuclear cooperation, notwithstanding welcome
presentations on the initiative from the U.S. delegation at
the CG meeting. She explained that Ireland would defer
taking a position pending a U.S. proposal on the sequencing
of steps envisaged in the initiative, encompassing, most
importantly, the measures by which India would separate its
military and civilian nuclear facilities. She hoped the
proposal would be forthcoming at a CG meeting to be scheduled
possibly in March, ahead of the May/June Plenary.
2. (C) Healy observed that Ireland currently fell somewhere
between, on one hand, France/UK, which supported the
initiative, and, on the other, Austria/Sweden, which had
serious reservations. The Irish Government's principal
concern remained the initiative's potential impact on the NPT
and NSG guidelines (ref B). She added that, absent fuller
details on sequencing, there had not been an opportunity for
discussion among Member State representatives at the CG
meeting on a possible common EU position. Healy also
highlighted other NSG members' hopes that India would take
steps beyond the proposed initiative, such as halting the
production of fissile material and acceding to the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
KENNY
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04