Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05WARSAW3694 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05WARSAW3694 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Warsaw |
| Created: | 2005-10-26 13:06:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PGOV PINR MARR PL Polish Elections |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 WARSAW 003694 SIPDIS STATE FOR EUR/NCE AND EUR E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/21/2010 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, PINR, MARR, PL, Polish Elections SUBJECT: DEFMIN CANDIDATES TELL EUR DAS PEKALA NEW GOP WILL EXPECT MORE ASSISTANCE FROM U.S. REF: WARSAW 3493 Classified By: Polcouns Mary Curtin for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d) 1. (C) SUMMARY. In a brief October 20 visit to Warsaw, EUR DAS Mark Pekala met separately with the three leading candidates for Defense Minister in the expected coalition government of Law and Justice (PiS) and Civic Platform (PO). Although perspectives and tones differed, Bronislaw Komorowski (PO), Radek Sikorski (PiS) and Przemyslaw Gosiewski (PiS) were consistent in their message that Poland needs to receive, and be seen by the public to receive, more concrete benefit out of its "special strategic relationship" with the U.S. END SUMMARY. Komorowski: The Confident Veteran --------------------------------- 2. (C) In a 45-minute meeting with DAS Pekala, once and possibly future Defense Minister Bronislaw Komorowski emphasized that Polish-U.S. relations would be as good if not better under the new coalition government being formed by top vote-getter Law & Justice (PiS) and his own Civic Platform (PO) as they had been under the outgoing SLD government. Echoing his message to DCM several weeks earlier (reftel), he expressed concern that the current government had allowed the Polish public's traditionally strong pro-American attitudes to erode, principally through mismanagement of public expectations related to Poland's participation in Iraq. As a result, the average Pole now believed that Poland had not received enough from the U.S. (i.e. non-immigrant visa waiver and/or more commercial contracts in Iraq) in exchange for its Iraq deployment. 3. (C) Komorowski also said the Iraq mission had pushed the Polish military to its financial and material limits, "ripped apart" units to form a deployable force for Iraq, and slowed Poland's defense reform and modernization. If Poland and the U.S. were to build a strategic relationship, and not just a tactical one, more than symbols were needed. Regarding Iraq, "We don't know what obligations the current government has made, but we will meet any obligations." Komorowski added, however, that if the U.S. expected Poland to stay in Iraq while simultaneously preparing to take up its ISAF commitments in 2007, the U.S. would have to provide help. The incoming government, he said, was looking for increased cooperation on a broad range of issues, including: - further assistance in accelerating professionalization of the Polish armed forces; - broadened political cooperation with the U.S., especially on Ukraine, Russia, and other regional issues; - continued cooperation on missile defense; - a visible gesture on visas, such as eliminating the fee for student travelers; - a visit by President Bush to Poland in 2006; and - substantive visits to Washington with tangible deliverables for the incoming Foreign and Defense Ministers. 4. (C) Komorowski suggested that Poland would like to leave Iraq with a success, and inquired as to the possibility of making the Polish/MND-CS sector the first in which security was officially turned over to Iraq security forces. This could be done in a ceremonial way highlighting the success of the Iraq mission, and would make it easier politically to ensure the continuation of the Polish mission as a training or advisory force. 5. (C) DAS Pekala responded that the USG was aware of the importance to the Polish public of the visa issue, and expressed concern over the lost opportunities to connect with the next generations of Polish young people. He emphasized that the U.S. also wanted a strategic relationship, reiterating President Bush's invitation for the new Defense and Foreign ministers to visit as soon as possible. Pekala pledged that such meetings would be strategic, and expressed hope that the new Polish president or prime ministerial would visit Washington early in 2006. He stressed that any concrete discussion of military assistance should be preceded by conversations on missions, requirements and our respective capabilities. Gosiewski: The Quiet Insider ---------------------------- 6. (C) Pekala met later with Przemyslaw Gosiewski (PiS), deputy Chairman of the Defense Committee in the outgoing Sejm (parliament) and newly elected deputy floor leader for PiS. Gosiewski, who was joined by PiS defense expert Pawel Soloch and newly elected PiS Senator Radek Sikorski, welcomed the opportunity to discuss the most pressing bilateral issues, particularly: - U.S. plans in Iraq; - U.S. plans in Afghanistan; - outstanding Polish "requests" in bilateral security discussions; and - ways of further developing the "special relationship" between Poland and the U.S. 7. (C) Gosiewski asserted that the new PiS-PO government would put major emphasis on NATO and the trans-Atlantic relationship, as well as close cooperation with the U.S. in the Global War on Terrorism. He stressed the importance of "providing security for all members of NATO." He hoped that the new government would be able to form quickly, despite what he described as an "emotional" political campaign environment, estimating that new cabinet ministers would take office in "late October or early November." 8. (C) In response to Pekala's explanation of U.S. goals in Iraq, Afghanistan and Eastern Europe, Gosiewski acknowledged that a difficult political task faced those engaged in building democracy and stability in Iraq. He said that his party was particularly engaged in Ukraine, and claimed that PiS had fielded the largest group of independent observers for the Ukrainian elections. 9. (C) Gosiewski stated that the new GOP would need to learn quickly about U.S. plans in Iraq, so as to formulate appropriate and complementary Polish plans. Unfortunately, the outgoing SLD-led government had left a very small budget for Iraq operations. Iraq would therefore be one of the first major political issues debated, and the Polish public would be following Iraq issues closely in November and December. For this reason, the GOP would need "convincing arguments" beyond just "coalition solidarity" to persuade the public. In return for Poland's contribution in Iraq, the U.S. would have to provide concrete signals of its support, including "military support" and possible U.S. basing in Poland. Gosiewski asked explicitly what the U.S. would offer in order to help the new government build support for an extended deployment in Iraq. He also noted that the "special relationship" with the U.S. had caused problems for Poland with some other EU members, and even "with our prospective coalition partner, PO." (COMMENT: He did not elaborate on this somewhat cryptic reference to PO. END COMMENT.) 10. (C) Pekala replied that the first step should be to establish the operational needs on the ground in Iraq. The U.S. had suspended discussions with the GOP during the Polish election season, particularly given that the outgoing government had explicitly left the final decision on Iraq to its successor. Now it was time to renew the discussion at both expert and senior levels. The U.S. was prepared for discussions in Warsaw, in Washington and at NATO in Brussels. Once the new government was formed, the U.S. was also ready to hold the next round of the Strategic Dialogue, which would no doubt cover such issues as Iraq, Afghanistan, defense reform, missile defense and military cooperation and assistance. Sikorski: The Well-Connected Outsider -------------------------------------- 11. (C) DAS Pekala's discussion over drinks with Radek Sikorski was shorter and more focused, as Sikorski had been present (though had not spoken once) at the Gosiewski meeting. Sikorski began by noting President Bush's public statement during his October 12 meeting with President Kwasniewski that he would welcome an early visit to Washington by the new Polish FM and DefMin. Acknowledging that his own name had "been bandied about" for the DefMin job, Sikorski said that he wanted to use his recent experience living and working in the U.S. (at the American Enterprise Institute) to play a "very positive role" in U.S.-Polish relations. He therefore was interested in learning what the "real limits" were on U.S. assistance to Poland. 12. (C) In reply, Pekala explained that the U.S. budget was under strain from Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma. He also warned Sikorski that Poland could not realistically expect military assistance in the coming years to match the $100 million package in 2005 under the Coalition Solidarity Fund or the $66 million in 2004 designated for the upcoming purchase of C-130 aircraft. Rather, the levels in 2006 and beyond would more likely return to near the baseline of $30-35 million. To this Sikorski responded in a serious tone that if the U.S. could not sustain $100 million assistance annually, "that would be a serious problem." 13. (C) Sikorski suggested exploring "creative solutions" to find indirect ways of assisting Poland's defense transformation, such as working through the Polish-Ukrainian battalion or "stretching out the F-16 payments." He also suggested concluding a "new bilateral agreement" (of undefined nature) between Poland and the U.S. to shore up public opinion, and suggested regional consultations on elaborating some form of "good cop/bad cop" approach to Belarus. Sikorski also said that, if he were indeed chosen as DefMin, he would make his first foreign trip to Ukraine to signal solidarity. Since he had spent the last few years in the U.S., it might not be appropriate in his case to go to Washington first. A Consistent Theme ------------------ 14. (C) COMMENT. There seems little doubt that one of the three senior politicians whom Pekala met will become the next Polish Defense Minister. Komorowski appears the obvious choice - PO has put him forward as its candidate for the Sejm Speaker, arguably the third-ranking job in government, but PiS has so far resisted the nomination, calling Komorowski too partisan. Sikorski's name has been mentioned almost as often, but PiS-PO coalition discussion to date have allotted the Defense Ministry to PO. Also, Sikorski's support base is not clear. He does not have obvious ties to President-elect Lech Kaczynski or his twin brother Jarek, the party leader, but he clearly enjoys a close relationship with PM-designate Marcinkiewicz. One possible job for Sikorski would be National Security Adviser, heading what Lech Kaczynski intends to be a much stronger Polish NSC. Finally, though Gosiewski is sometimes mentioned as a possible DefMin, he is much more the inside party man and has very close ties to Lech Kaczynski. Should current PiS floor leader Ludwik Dorn receive a cabinet post as expected, Gosiewski could well end up heading the PiS caucus, and he could equally well become Chairman of the Defense Committee of the Sejm. 15. (C) Regardless of which man takes the job, however, the main message is the same. The new Polish government will value the U.S. partnership and trans-Atlantic relationship above all, but it will also expect to gain more direct benefit from these ties. An October 20 luncheon that Ambassador Ashe hosted in honor of Foreign Minister Rotfeld was notable for its collegiality; the only mildly discordant note was set by newly appointed Polish Ambassador to the U.S. Janusz Reiter, who took Pekala aside and went on at some length on this same theme of "Poland wants to see more out of this relationship." It echoed again at a DCM-hosted dinner for DAS Pekala with a select group of journalists and think tank leaders. Poland is a loyal ally and will stand by the U.S., but we can expect to be reminded regularly and at a senior level over the next few years that loyalty is a two-way street - which requires concrete examples of its benefits to both sides. END COMMENT. 16. (U) DAS Pekala cleared this message. ASHE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04