Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05THEHAGUE2845 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05THEHAGUE2845 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy The Hague |
| Created: | 2005-10-20 13:07:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL PHUM PGOV KDEM EAID BO NL EUN |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L THE HAGUE 002845 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/18/2015 TAGS: PREL, PHUM, PGOV, KDEM, EAID, BO, NL, EUN SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/BELARUS: DUTCH SUPPORT CIVIL SOCIETY IN BELARUS REF: STATE 188900 Classified By: ACTING DCM ANDREW J. SCHOFER FOR REASONS 1.4(B) AND (D). 1. (C) SUMMARY: The Dutch support promoting civil society in Belarus and are prepared to pursue this objective bilaterally. At the same time, they do not want to appear out of step from an EU consensus, and in general prefer constructive engagement over isolation. The Dutch recognize that relations with Russia will be a factor in determining the "robustness" of European approaches. END SUMMARY. 2. (C) On October 13, POLCOUNS discussed reftel points on promoting democracy and civil society in Belarus with Pim Dumore, Director of the Dutch MFA's Office of Political Affairs. Dumore stressed that the Dutch are very supportive of promoting civil society in Belarus, but cautioned that the Dutch and other Europeans were not comfortable with overly "robust" programs aimed at changing the regime. Dumore expressed frustration with the European approach since, in his view, only Lukashenko's departure from power would give the Belarusian people a real chance to determine their own future. 3. (C) POLCOUNS asked how active the Dutch were prepared to be in Belarus bilaterally, as opposed to working through the EU. Dumore responded that the Dutch were one of relatively few EU countries with the ability and will to provide assistance directly to NGO's inside Belarus. In his last job, as Dutch Ambassadaor to Vilnius, Dumore had been personally involved in such efforts, some of which involved working through Polish or Lithuanian organization. As far as possible, however, the Dutch would prefer not to be out of step with the EU. Dumore noted that EU relations with Russia would naturally be a factor in determining EU policies toward Belarus. 4. (C) On October 17, the Charge briefly raised Belarus in a meeting with Dutch MFA POLDIR Hugo Siblesz. Siblesz shared Dumore's view that the EU had become "deadlocked" over how to handle Belarus. None of the various approaches tried so far had been successful in moderating Lukashenko's behavior, he added. Noting that Russian President Putin would visit the Netherlands in early November, Siblesz said Belarus would probably be on the agenda, but made clear he did not expect any breakthroughs. 5. (C) Charge also raised reftel points with Renee Jones-Bos, MFA Director-General for Regional and Consular Affairs, on October 20. Jones-Bos, a former Dutch Ambassador for Human Rights Affairs, confirmed that the Dutch actively supported promoting civil society in Belarus. She noted that the Dutch had good relations with several NGO's in Belarus and provided support through the Dutch Embassy in Warsaw. She added, however, that the Dutch and other Europeans preferred a policy of constructive engagement with Belarus to one of isolation. BLAKEMAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04