Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ANKARA6300 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ANKARA6300 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ankara |
| Created: | 2005-10-18 07:30:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | PGOV PHUM PREL TU OSCE |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ANKARA 006300 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/SE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV, PHUM, PREL, TU, OSCE SUBJECT: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT PRESIDENT DISCUSSES JUDICIAL REFORM, SECULARISM WITH CDA 1. (U) Summary: Tulay Tugcu, newly elected president of Turkey's Constitutional Court, told Charge during an October 7 meeting that she is proposing a constitutional amendment that would allow individual citizens to apply directly to the Court. Tugcu defended the headscarf ban in universities as a necessary measure to resist "pressure" from Turkish Muslims who want to break down the barrier between religion and state. End Summary. --------------------------- Tugcu Proposes Court Reform --------------------------- 2. (U) Tugcu told Charge that during her term as court president, which will end in 2007 when she turns 65 and will be required to retire, she will advocate a constitutional reform that would enable Turkish citizens to apply directly to have their cases reviewed by the Constitutional Court. Currently, only lower courts can direct cases to the Constitutional Court. Allowing individuals to apply directly -- as U.S. citizens can apply to the Supreme Court -- would reduce the number of applications from Turkey to the European Court of Human Rights, and enable Turkey to resolve more cases within its own system, she said. 3. (U) In order to handle the extra caseload, Tugcu said, the Constitutional Court would have to be divided into two panels. Currently, there are 11 sitting justices and four alternates. The alternates could be made full judges, allowing for the establishment of two separate panels. The full court could meet for certain types of cases, such as those involving the potential closing of political parties. 4. (U) Tugcu noted that the ruling AK Party (AKP) has proposed increasing the number of Constitutional Court judges to 21, including seven who would be elected by Parliament. Currently, the national president appoints all Constitutional Court members, the majority of whom are chosen from among candidates nominated by other high courts and the Higher Education Council. Tugcu said Constitutional Court members oppose the AKP plan, which they believe would politicize the court, but have been restrained in their comments because they recognize that many countries do elect high court members. 5. (SBU) The CDA said she realizes that many Turkish judges are angry about the proposal for electing court members. But the idea of electing judges is accepted in many countries around the world. The question is how to conduct the elections in order to ensure that the best people are selected. Tugcu said part of the answer is to establish required qualifications for candidates. The quality of the court would suffer if political parties elected as judges party members who failed to get elected to Parliament. Tugcu said PM Erdogan and Justice Minister Cicek have assured Court members that they will consider justices' views on the issue. -------------------------------------- Headscarf Ban a Response to "Pressure" -------------------------------------- 6. (SBU) Charge asked Tugcu to describe the court's role in the area of religious freedom. Tugcu averred that under Turkish secularism, everyone is free to believe that they want. However, if you represent the state, you cannot use your office to display religious symbols or engage in religious expression. For example, if PM Erdogan became president, there would be no problem with his wife, Emine, wearing an Islamic headscarf at home in the presidential palace. But she would not be permitted to wear it while she is representing the state. 7. (U) In a university environment, Tugcu continued, where young people study and socialize in close proximity, the use of the Islamic headcovering creates religious conflict. When students return home they can wear what they please. Tugcu noted that she has a daughter living in the U.S., and she understands that the U.S. practice is different. However, in the U.S., she said, the state does not face the same pressure from the religious community that the Turkish state must confront. In the U.S., the religious community is not driven by its beliefs to try to impose its will on the state. In Turkey, by contrast, the dominant religion of Islam has "certain rules" that compel many pious Turks to try to break down the barrier between religion and state. The headscarf ban, unnecessary in the U.S., is part of the Turkish state's efforts to resist this pressure. MCELDOWNEY
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04