Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BANGKOK6564 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BANGKOK6564 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Bangkok |
| Created: | 2005-10-17 08:44:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | EAGR ECON ETRD KIPR WTO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS BANGKOK 006564 SIPDIS STATE FOR EB/IPE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: EAGR, ECON, ETRD, KIPR, WTO SUBJECT: THAILAND AND GI IN THE WTO REF: SECSTATE 180474 1. On October 17, Emboff met with Deputy Director General Wiboonlasana Ruamraksa of the Department of Intellectual Property, and Trademark Office Director Pajchima Thanasanti and presented talking points on upcoming WTO agriculture negotiations and geographical indications (GI) as requested in reftel. 2. DDG Wiboonlasana stated that while the EU proposal was not perfect, Thailand supported Article 23 extension for GIs in the WTO, and favored a multilateral registration system for GIs. Wiboonlasana explained that the cost of registration of Thai GIs abroad was expensive and Thailand would therefore be supportive of a system that would reduce costs. She was less concerned with the costs to Thailand that could result from the EU's more expansive proposal as Thailand did not to her knowledge produce any of the items that the EU wished to protect under geographical indications. 3. Wiboonlasana indicated that Thailand did not support inclusion of geographical indications in agriculture negotiations and agreed with the U.S. position that GIs should be considered in the TRIPS Council. However, she encouraged flexibility by the U.S. in TRIPS negotiations and warned that a lack of progress in TRIPS on GIs would inevitably hamper agriculture negotiations. BOYCE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04