Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05OTTAWA3069 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05OTTAWA3069 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Ottawa |
| Created: | 2005-10-13 19:10:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | PBTS PGOV PREL PINS CA |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available. 131910Z Oct 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 OTTAWA 003069 SIPDIS STATE FOR WHA/EX, WHA/CAN WHITE HOUSE FOR HOMELAND SECURITY COUNCIL (Townsend) DHS OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (Marmaud) FEMA (Office of the Director) E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PBTS, PGOV, PREL, PINS, CA SUBJECT: Hurricane Katrina and Canadian Response; Lessons Learned 1. Summary: Operational linkages between DHS and Canada's Public Safety Ministry (PSEPC) worked reasonably well as Canada responded to provide relief in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. But, to make those connections even more effective, Canada would like to have a DHS Liaison Officer stationed at the Canadian operations center in Ottawa, and would like the PSEPC Liaison Officer now assigned to DHS HQ to be inside the DHS Operations Center. PSEPC feels also that other linkages need to be strengthened (such as in emergency response policy and planning) with DHS. To ensure that Canada-U.S. disaster management and response is as robust as possible, Embassy and GoC officials agreed it is time to reinvigorate the "Consultative Group on Comprehensive Civil Emergency Planning and Management" as mandated by the 1986 Canada-U.S. Agreement on Cooperation in Comprehensive Civil Emergency Planning and Management. Embassy plans on following up by hosting a bilateral meeting in Ottawa before the end of the year with DHS, Northcom, State, their Canadian counterparts, and other interested agencies, to advance this agenda. End summary. 2. James Young, Canada's Special Advisor to the Deputy Minister at Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada (PSEPC) and Ross Hynes, the Director of the Secretariat for the Stabilization and Reconstruction Task Force at Foreign Affairs Canada (FAC) joined the DCM for lunch on Friday, October 6, along with several other Embassy, PSEPC and FAC staff members for a discussion of Canada's assistance to the United States in response to Hurricane Katrina (see para 16 for participant list). All present agreed that the Canadian response was timely and generous, and that the deep links between the two countries allowed for multiple channels of communication and action. Bob Lesser, the Director General of Operations for PSEPC and Craig Oldham, the Director of PSEPC's Government Operations Center noted that the PSEPC operational link with the DHS Homeland Security Center worked well; especially so because PSEPC has recently posted an employee to DHS HQ. --------------------- PSEPC and DHS Liaison --------------------- 3. Young and Lesser mentioned that PSEPC sees great value in having its liaison officer at DHS HQ placed within the DHS Homeland Security Operations Center in order to gain greater situational awareness. This would create an even more effective link between PSEPC and DHS during emergencies and disasters. Currently the Liaison Officer has an office separate from the Ops Center. Lesser and Oldham noted that the issue of security clearances is a barrier to their Liaison Officer gaining full access to the DHS Center; but that models exist (for example at NORAD and NATO) to overcome this barrier. (Comment - This came up during several visits last year by senior DHS officials, such as Admiral Loy who indicated he would try to work through the clearance issues. With so much information and intelligence already available to GOC through other channels it strikes us as odd that we continue to have this restriction as we work to improve seamless coordination on border security and emergency response.) Lesser also mentioned that PSEPC is keenly interested in having DHS station a DHS Liaison Officer within the PSEPC Government Operations Center in Ottawa. 4. Oldham described the role of Canada's Government Operations Center as providing a strategic coordination function for the national response. That is, it provides a central node to identify, track, and - ideally - to coordinate federal, provincial and local response. Another department such as National Defence or Transport Canada, depending upon that organization's technical expertise and equipment, may lead the actual operational response. Oldham added, however, that because Provinces have broad jurisdiction in emergency response, command and control of disaster management is not as clear as it would be in a unitary state such as the UK or France. 5. Although operational coordination between DHS and PSEPC was smooth, largely because of the PSEPC Liaison Officer's presence at DHS HQ, Lesser, Oldham and Young noted that at the policy coordination level for emergency management there remains some confusion about where and how the two organizations should connect. For example PSEPC's emergency planning predecessor, the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection and Emergency Preparedness (OCIPEP) had a strong connection with FEMA. The shifting status of FEMA within DHS and the absorption of OCIPEP into PSEPC has attenuated somewhat those pre-existing linkages. PSEPC believes that it is critical to invigorate linkages between the emergency planning and response policy communities in these two new departments. --------------------------------------------- --------------- --------- Coordination with Provinces; Provincial and Private Aid Contributions --------------------------------------------- --------------- --------- 6. With respect to the differing jurisdictions that have a role to play, PSEPC's James Young offered his view that Katrina and other recent emergencies underscore that the role of governments is changing. Issues don't cascade smoothly from the municipal to provincial (or state) to federal level as they once did. He emphasized that it is important now to get all levels of government involved at an earlier stage. Young, who has a background in medicine, illustrated his point by noting that in the case of an influenza pandemic, even though the primary response will be provincial, there will need to be a consistent response nationwide which will require very early and close coordination between the federal, provincial, and local governments. 7. The unparalleled relationship between Canada and the U.S., with its hundreds of millions of border crossings each year, coupled with a completely integrated energy infrastructure (a prime CIP asset) and the proximity of major Canadian cities to the U.S. border (approximately 80 percent of the Canadian population lives within 100 miles of the United States border), suggest that to be as robust as possible emergency preparedness planning must fully include the Canada-U.S. dimension. For example one avenue of aid contribution could be the ability of provinces to provide resources (perhaps first responder units) to "backfill" for northern states that send their own resources to help other states in need. That is, Canadian resources could be seen as a force multiplier that allows rapid response from U.S. states to afflicted regions, and vice versa. 8. On a related note, Craig Oldham cautioned, that there needs to be consideration of resources and redundancy by the provincial and federal governments. For example when Vancouver's Heavy Urban Search and Rescue (HUSAR) Team went to Louisiana, as they did for Katrina, it was necessary to identify who could respond to an emergency in Vancouver while the HUSAR team was absent. 9. Emboffs described also the phenomenon of private sector offers of aid and asked how those were tracked by PSEPC. Lesser and Oldham noted that they had a long list of private offers which they had forwarded to DHS, but that they were not always certain which offers had been acted upon. All agreed that there were many cases of private aid efforts that were not communicated or coordinated through the federal government. In one instance, for example, the Embassy was aware of chartered aircraft carrying Canadian volunteer Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT) to the affected Gulf States. The effort was arranged and managed solely via informal routes within the Canadian and American EMT community. There may be a need to more explicitly recognize this type of interaction in joint Canada - United States emergency planning. ------------------------- View from Foreign Affairs ------------------------- 10. Ross Hynes mentioned that although nominally Foreign Affairs had the lead in coordinating the Canadian response to Katrina, that the role was shared because of the existing PSEPC-DHS links; there were no turf issues at the operational level. Whether communication went through PSEPC- DHS or FAC-State channels was immaterial as far as they were concerned. Tobi Nussbaum, Director of the U.S. Relations Division at FAC, added that there was another level of communication as well, i.e. between Canadian military and foreign affairs officers at NORAD/Northcom and Canadian authorities at FAC and Department of National Defence (DND). 11. Hynes told us that the GOC will be compiling an internal lessons-learned on the Katrina response, and invited U.S. participation in that exercise. They plan to address, inter alia, an inventory of challenges such as: consular access; channels of aid offers; the FEMA-PSEPC link; and approval process for use of DND assets. --------------------------------------------- --------------- ----- Next steps: Establish U.S.- Canada Group under the 1986 Agreement --------------------------------------------- --------------- ----- 12. The DCM summed up by saying it would indeed be useful to create an index of issues from the lessons learned and subsequently have Canadian and American officials work together to prepare a full lessons learned report as suggested by Ross Hynes. 13. Both the Canadian and American participants at the luncheon agreed that the 1986 bilateral agreement on "cooperation in comprehensive civil emergency planning and management" allows for a broad array of actions and should still be an effective strategic blueprint and broad-brush guide for Canada and the United States to provide assistance in case of disasters. 14. But to address specific planning, and to address some of the gaps identified in the Katrina response, it may be time to reinvigorate the Consultative Group on Comprehensive Civil Emergency Planning and Management as mandated in Article I of the Agreement. The Consultative Group, which is described (in Annex I of the Agreement) as being responsible for supervising Canada-United States comprehensive civil emergency planning and management, for both peacetime and times of hostilities, is tasked with, inter alia: recommending to the two governments actions to be taken regarding studies, the exchange of information, and the development and coordination of plans and recommendations; encouraging and facilitating planning and development of mutual cooperation for comprehensive civil emergency management by provinces, states and municipalities; and the group may invite other federal, regional, provincial, state or local authorities and representatives of the private sector to meetings of the working groups, as appropriate, with the prior consent of both Parties. Thus it seems the ideal forum and body to address the bilateral assistance questions raised during the Katrina response. 15. To precipitate an invigorated Consultative Group on Comprehensive Civil Emergency Planning and Management the Embassy plans on hosting a bilateral meeting in Ottawa before the end of the year with participation from DHS, from Department of Defense (in particular from Northern Command) from State, along with their Canadian counterparts, and other interested agencies. Embassy will be in contact with Washington agencies in the next few weeks to identify appropriate participants. ------------ Participants ------------ 16. US Embassy: DCM John Dickson, Political Minister- Counselor Brian Flora, DHS Attach John Considine, Economic Officer Lucy Abbott, Economic Specialist Bud Locklear. GoC: James Young, Special Advisor to the Deputy Minister PSEPC; Bob Lesser, DG Operations, PSEPC; Craig Oldham, Director Operations Center, PSEPC; Ross Hynes, Director, Secretariat for the Stabilization and Reconstruction Task Force, FAC; Tobias (Toby) Nussbaum, Director, U.S. Relations Division, FAC. Wilkins
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04