Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BRASILIA2729 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BRASILIA2729 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Brasilia |
| Created: | 2005-10-13 15:56:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | KIPR ETRD ECON IPR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 002729 SIPDIS SENSITIVE DEPT FOR EB/IPE, WHA/EPSC AND WHA/BSC DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USTR FOR MSULLIVAN, JMENDENHALL USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/WH/OLAC/JANDERSEN/ADRISCOLL/MWAR D USDOC FOR 3134/ITA/USCS/OIO/WH/RD/DDEVITO/DANDERSEN/EOL SON NSC FOR SCRONIN AID FOR LAC/AA DHHS FOR STEIGER E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: KIPR, ETRD, ECON, IPR & Biotech SUBJECT: ABBOTT AND GOB REACH DEAL TO AVOID COMPULSORY LICENSE REF: BRASILIA 2157 (NOTAL) 1. SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED -- PLEASE TREAT ACCORDINGLY 2. (U) Summary. On October 10, Abbott Laboratories and Brazil's Ministry of Health reached an agreement on pricing and supply of the AIDS treatment drug Kaletra, ending seven-months of intense negotiations under the threat of compulsory licensing (see reftel). Now that talks with Abbott have concluded, the MoH will likely turn its attention to pending negotiations with Merck, Sharp & Dohme and Gilead Sciences over their AIDS anti-retrovirals. While the negotiated resolution with Abbott does not guarantee a positive outcome for these firms, it provides some grounds for optimism. End Summary. 3. (U) An October 11 press release from Brazil's Ministry of Health confirmed Abbott's communication to the USG the previous day that it had reached an accord with the GoB on its AIDS treatment drug Kaletra. The MoH claimed victory in reaching an agreement that would help guarantee the continued viability of Brazil's universal access AIDS treatment program by substantially reducing drug costs; according to the Ministry, the agreement will provide savings of $339 million between 2006 and 2011. 4. (U) Post did not receive details of the deal from Abbott, but the MoH release claimed the company had agreed to drop the per unit price for Kaletra from the current $1.17 to $0.63, beginning in March 2006. The change-over would begin in February when the MoH would purchase 9 million capsules at the current price and an additional 2.8 million at the reduced price. Thereafter, all sales would be at the $0.63 price, without any link to volume. In comparison, a short-lived, informal deal struck on July 8 by Abbott with the then outgoing Minister of Health had envisioned fixed GoB annual expenditures for the drug, only producing a reduction in per unit price over time -- the MoH had projected an average per unit price of $0.81 for the 2006-2010 period. Subsequently the MoH had pressed for a price of $0.41 per unit. 5. (U) As part of the October 10 agreement, the MoH said Abbott had agreed to donate $3 million worth of medicine or inputs. The MoH also claims it will enjoy some advantage in acquiring the new formulation of Kaletra, Meltex, that is currently undergoing FDA approval. 6. (SBU) Although letters threatening compulsory licensing were also sent in March 2005 to Merck, Sharp & Dohme and Gilead Sciences regarding their anti-retrovirals Efavirenz and Tenofovir, respectively, the MoH has only held discussions with Abbott since June. Now that those talks have concluded, the MoH is expected to turn its attention to these other two companies. While the shape and outcome of those negotiations will depend on the particular business considerations of each firm, there is reason to be hopeful that a negotiated resolution is possible, given that in its talks with Abbott, the MoH did not succumb to intense pressure from international NGOs and domestic political forces to issue a compulsory license. 7. (SBU) Per our October 13 conversation with Gilead, company representatives are currently weighing how to move forward with the MoH. It is unclear whether recent negative comments by Health Minister Felipe about Gilead's pricing of Tenofovir referred to pricing under the company's current contract or to its late May offer to the GoB - to which, to date, the MoH has not provided an official response. Meanwhile, we are trying to get in touch with the local Merck representative to get a better idea of that company's next steps. Danilovich
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04