Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 02FRANKFURT10187 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 02FRANKFURT10187 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Consulate Frankfurt |
| Created: | 2002-11-04 14:46:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | PTER PINR PGOV AG GM |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 FRANKFURT 010187 SIPDIS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED - NOT FOR INTERNET DISTRIBUTION DEPARTMENT FOR EUR/AGS DEPARTMENT FOR INR/TNC - MIKE STEINITZ DEPARTMENT FOR INR/EU - BOWMAN MILLER AND HENRY RECTOR DEPARTMENT FOR S/CT - PAUL BOYD AND STEPHANIE MOLNAR DEPARTMENT FOR DS/OP/EUR FBI FOR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS UNIT - SUE CURTIS FBI FOR COUNTERTERRORISM DIVISION - KEVIN FOUST JUSTICE FOR CRIMINAL DIVISION, OFFICE OF TERRORISM AND VIOLENT CRIMES - TERESA WALLBAUM E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PTER, PINR, PGOV, AG, GM SUBJECT: FOURTH REPORT ON ISLAMIC TERRORISM TRIAL IN FRANKFURT - THE DEFENDANTS GIVE CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS REF: A. FRANKFURT 3580 (NOTAL); B. FRANKFURT 5829; C. FRANKFURT 6207 1. (SBU) Summary: This report summarizes the events at the Frankfurt terrorism trial from July to September 2002. Four Algerian and one Moroccan (listed below) are accused of planning an attack on the Strasbourg Christmas market in December 2000 and bomb building materials were found in their Frankfurt apartments. They were arrested in December 2000 and their trial began in Frankfurt, April 2002. The defendants have claimed that their intention was to bomb an empty Jewish synagogue and not to kill anyone. The court is trying to determine a) what the intended target actually was; b) if there was any connection to other terrorists or terrorist organizations. Two London contacts, presumed to be Islamic extremists, have been mentioned: Abu Doha and Noureddine. Thus far, no firm Al Qaeda link has been found, although a witness, Sadikki, mentioned that defendant Beandali had contact with Abdul Rachman, described as "a representative of Usama Bin Laden in London." This report will focus on the testimonies of the defendants, Beandali, Boukari, Karimou, Maroni and Sabour and that of a witness, Sadikki. End summary. The Defendants and Witnesses ---------------------------- 2. (SBU) We are repeating here the names, dates of birth and known aliases of the defendants. (Some variances in spelling have been seen in different sources.) Defendants: - Aeurobui Beandali (also Deandali) DOB 12/10/1975; aka Ben Ali; aka Mustapha Mestpha Kelouili DOB 11/19/1978; aka Djilali Benali Correia DOB 7/15/1975; aka Djilali Adadi DOB 6/5/1975. (Presumed Algerian.) - Samir Karimou (also Krimou) aka Ibrahim Ahmed, DOB 12/18/1968. (Released from prison August 30, 2002. Continues to attend trial.) Moroccan. - Lamine Moroni, DOB 1/10/1970; aka Benard Pascale, DOB 7/25/1970. (Presumed Algerian.) - Fouhad Sabour, DOB 2/13/1965; aka Hassene Benaimine DOB 12/08/1967; aka Samir Bouinoual DOB 8/9/1978; aka Alain Dubois. (Born in France.) - Salim Boukhari (also Boukari), DOB 8/8/1971; aka Hicham El-Haddad, DOB 4/30 1980; aka Claude Aman, DOB 8/8/1971; aka Karim Muscat DOB 8/8/1971; aka Messaoud (also Mesud) Zamali (also Zemani) DOB 8/4/1966. (Presumed Algerian.) Witnesses: - Aknoush, in detention in France. Beandali's attorney, Diebrucks and Aknoush's attorney have been in touch. Aknoush's written statements have been considered by the Frankfurt court although Aknoush has not yet appeared for questioning. He is expected to testify in Frankfurt in the coming weeks. - Mohammed Sadikki, was in prison along with Marino and Beandali in two German prisons. Beandali asked Sadikki to deliver messages to a mosque in Frankfurt. Aeurobui Beandali: The Bomb Builder ----------------------------------- 3. (SBU) Aeurobui Beandali was the first of the defendants to testify before the court. Beandali admitted he was an expert in explosives and said it was his job to buy the bomb- building materials. He said he was specially trained in Afghanistan in religion, light weapons, heavy weapons and explosives (dates of his training are disputed but he claimed about November 1999 - August 2000). He explained that the bomb was to be placed in a large Pakistan-made steam pot, which he ordered in London. He also bought large amounts of potassium permanganate, which he said he originally wanted to use for an attack in Algeria. Beandali claimed surprise that the target might be in France and said he did not want to kill Europeans. Target: Christmas Market or Synagogue? -------------------------------------- 4. (SBU) Beandali claimed that Salim Boukhari, another defendant and member of the group, was receiving orders from London to attack a target in France. According to Beandali, Boukhari reassured Beandali that the target would be an empty synagogue in Strasbourg. Beandali ordered Boukhari and Sabour to drive to Strasbourg and film the synagogue both inside and outside so he could build the right size bomb for the target. When the completed videotape showed the Christmas Market area instead of the synagogue, Beandali said he became very angry and ordered Boukhari and Sabour to try again a second time in Strasbourg, this time with a city map. They were arrested before they could make a second trip. (Note: The videotape was shown in court on August 27, 2002 and clearly showed the Strasbourg Christmas market and surrounding area, panning the market and stalls several times. Audio comments were heard on the tape referring to "the enemies of God." There was no synagogue on the videotape. End Note.) Who is Noureddine and What Was His Role? ---------------------------------------- 5. (SBU) Beandali said he had started to wonder if Boukari's plan to attack an empty synagogue was actually true when the videotape showed the Christmas market area near the cathedral. Beandali said that when he learned that a man named Noureddine in London was behind the plan, he found it even more unlikely that the target was only an empty building. "A guy like Noureddine certainly had something more spectacular in mind, something where people could be hurt." Beandali said he met Noureddine in Afghanistan and noted he did not follow Islamic washing rites. He described Noureddine as an Algerian with a French passport living in London. He also claimed that Noureddine was an undercover agent of French intelligence and that Noureddine had told Beandali that the French secret service had offered him money to inform on Algerians living in London and Afghanistan. Beandali also said that Noureddine was flown out of the Balkans by the French government. Noureddine was also interested in a man named Hischam, Beandali claimed was wanted by the FBI. Beandali said he helped Hischam escape from Afghanistan to London, then to Germany and Spain. Eventually, Hischam was arrested in Algeria and Beandali believes Noureddine turned Hischam into authorities. Comment on Beandali's Statements -------------------------------- 6. (SBU) Comment: Beandali and Boukhari are in a mutual blame game to show that the other is a) the leader of the group; or b) in touch with a London contact giving the orders for the group. Beandali accuses Boukhari of being the leader and knowing the "real" plan (i.e. to bomb the Christmas market and kill people). Beandali claims that Boukhari hid this plan from Beandali. So who is the leader, Beandali, Boukhari, or someone in London? Maroni, in one of his rare statements, describes Beandali as the one giving the orders for the group. Regarding the target, Beandali is the only one of the five defendants who openly questioned the claim of the others that the plan was to attack an empty synagogue. The videotape showing only the Christmas market in Strasbourg is compelling evidence. By claiming he played no part in selecting the "real target," Beandali seeks to protect himself against charges of attempted murder. Salim Boukhari -------------- 7. (SBU) The defendant Salim Boukhari appears to have been somewhat of a geographic outsider to the Frankfurt cell, with stronger connections to London. He lived in London starting about 1995 and married there twice. After his divorce in 1998, he stayed one or two months with Noureddine in London. Boukhari said he originally wanted to donate money to the Algerian freedom struggle but instead used it to go to Afghanistan (September 1999 - early 2000, but dates unclear) where he trained in light and heavy weapons, electronics and religion. He moved to Germany in mid- November 2000. Boukhari Tries to Implicate Beandali in Knowledge of Target --------------------------------------------- -------------- 8. (SBU) Boukhari refused to answer questions from the prosecution and only responded to those from the judges. Boukhari's statements were often confusing and inconsistent. Boukhari said that he intended to return to London in December 2000 and it was uncertain whether he would be present at the time of the attack. Boukhari admits he was the point of contact for Nourredine in London. Boukhari claims, however, that Nourreddine did not give orders or designate a target but gave "only ideas." Boukhari's statements showed frequent inconsistencies in describing Beandali's role and advance knowledge of the target. First Boukhari insisted Beandali knew about the bombing plans as early as November, 2000. Beandali vigorously denied this. Then Boukhari changed this to say, "Beandali knew about a phone call with Nourredine (in November)." Again, Beandali denied it, and seemed to want to distance himself from Noureddine, whom he apparently distrusted as an informant (see para 5). Was Boukhari the Leader? He Admits Contact with London --------------------------------------------- ---------- 9. (SBU) Boukhari contradicted Beandali on a question about the use of the Baden Baden apartment. Beandali said the apartment was intended as a kind of "storage place" for the materials for the bomb that was to be built in Frankfurt. Boukhari said he had intented actually to build the bomb in Baden Baden. Aknoush, a witness in detention in Paris, stated that Boukhari was in contact with Abu Doha in London. Boukhari said he had spoken with Abu Doha but only on the subject of renting rooms in Baden Baden. Aknoush also said that Boukhari was the assigned leader of the Frankfurt cell. Sabour and Maroni: Maroni says Beandali was the Leader, Sabour says Beandali was in Touch with London --------------------------------------------- ---------- 10. (SBU) Fouhad Sabour's statement came haltingly and was sometimes inconsistent with previous statements by the other defendants. Sabour's role in the plot is unclear. Boukhari, in his statements, denied that Sabour had any detailed knowledge of the advance planning of the bombing. It seems Sabour was assigned some duties to help in carrying out the attack together with Boukhari or Beandali. Sabour admitted having accompanied Boukhari on their trip to Strasbourg to videotape the target. Sabour also stated that Beandali was assigned to participate in the attack together with him. In response to the question of who planned the attack, Sabour delivered yet another version: the plan to attack the synagogue in Strasbourg was entirely the decision of the Frankfurt group. But Sabour also mentioned that Beandali was in frequent phone contact with London. "Beandali phoned London," was among Sabour's favorite phrases. (Comment: Sabour seemed to regard Beandali as head of the cell, though he did not specifically say so. End Comment.) Maroni confirmed Sabour's statements and also indicated he viewed Beandali as the group's leader. Lamine Maroni has not yet formally testified, though he announced he would do so in the near future. Busid Karimou Released, Continues to Attend Trial --------------------------------------------- ---- 11. (SBU) Busid Karimou was released from detention on August 30, 2002. The court could not find any evidence he was involved in the preparations for the bomb attack, thus he was only charged with membership in a terrorist organization. This carries a one-to-ten year sentence. Since Karimou has already served 17 months in detention and the court apparently felt he would not get more than a two- year sentence, he was released. (Note: It is common practice in the German legal system to release a well- behaved prisoner after two-thirds of his sentence is over. Further justification is required to keep Karimou for his full length of sentence. End Note.) Born in Morocco, Karimou went to Germany in February 1999, but later moved to London. From there he went to Afghanistan for training, a fact that he denied in his previous statements. He returned to London after only three months of training and from there moved to Frankfurt in July 2000. Apparently his apartment there was used as a meeting point for the group. Karimou refused to acknowledge any prior knowledge of the attack. Witness Mohammed Sadikki Claims Beandali had Al Qaeda Contact in London: Abdul Rachman --------------------------------------------- -------- 12. (SBU) Mohammed Sadikki, who was not very impressive in recalling details, was an inmate along with Maroni and Beandali in two German prisons. His statement revealed the rather lax conditions regarding contact between prisoners. In both Kassel and Weiterstadt prison he easily established contact with Maroni and Beandali, who both tried to win him over for their group. They also asked Sadikki to deliver messages to contacts after his release. Maroni told Sadikki that Maroni knew secrets he had not told police. Maroni also admitted having participated in a number of terrorist operations in the U.K. According to Sadikki, Beandali asked Sadikki to deliver a message to a mosque in Frankfurt and talked of the need to fight Christians and Jews. Beandali mentioned a synagogue in Lille, France as a potential target. Beandali also said that his group planned further attacks in Germany, France and Spain. Beandali never mentioned the Strasbourg Christmas market to Sadikki, but Beandali said he would like to turn Rome, the cradle of Christianity, into ashes. 13. (SBU) Sadikki verified Beandali's role as bomb expert and indicated that Beandali and other members of the group coordinated their testimonies in prison before the trial started. Sadikki mentioned Usama Bin Laden twice. Beandali asked Sadikki to contact a man named Abdul Rachman in London after his release. Beandali described Rachman as "Usama bin Laden's representative" in London, who had also promised to take hostages to force the release of the members of the Frankfurt cell from prison. Beandali told Sadikki that the camp in Afghanistan at which he was trained was run by Usama bin Laden. Sadikki said the Frankfurt group had 38 million Deutsche marks at their disposal (which caused the other defendants to laugh). Sadikki also said that the group used forged and stolen credit cards. Comment: Beandali Against the Rest ---------------------------------- 14. (SBU) Several rounds of testimony have not resolved key questions of the prosecution: What was the structure of the group? Who was the leader? Was there an external (i.e. London-based) leader, who gave instructions? Whose idea was the bombing plan and what exactly was its goal? Did the group intend to kill people at the Christmas market or did they "only" want to bomb an empty synagogue? This question is crucial for deciding their sentence. What has indeed changed over the previous weeks is the strategy of the defendants and the defense. After first appearing to be a concerted effort by the defendants, the trial now looks more like a game of "Beandali against the rest." Boukari, Maroni and Sabour (who apparently dislikes Beandali) state that Beandali was the group's leader. It is relatively clear that Beandali and Boukari are the key responsible figures, though their exact roles are still shadowy. 15. (SBU) Comment Continued: Another trend we noted in recent trial sessions is that Beandali's lawyer, Diebrucks, has developed into a leading voice for the defense. He has played a very proactive role. This was shown, for instance in the meeting between Diebrucks and the lawyer for Aknoush, another key witness now in detention in France. (Note: To add to the confusion, some journalists observing the trial believe Aknoush may have been the leader of the Frankfurt group. End Note.) Comment Cont: Beandali's Statements May Help Prosecution --------------------------------------------- ----------- 16. (SBU) Comment Continued: Despite the confusing allegations by others, Beandali's statements were the most consistent. Beandali claimed that Boukari planned the attack and that he himself was "just the bomb builder." Beandali's is the only one who, in his statements, has cast doubt on the synagogue as the actual target. His strategy may be to save his skin by discrediting the other defendants, which would also explain the opposition he faces from the other accused. Beandali's early cooperation with the court could also work to his advantage. In addition to the strong evidence of the videotape, the prosecution has found in Beandali's statements support for their case that the target was the Christmas market -- and human victims. After a rough start, the prosecution seems to be gaining ground, though they still have a long way to go to make their case. The story of an attack on a synagogue has been used consistently by all other defendants and witnesses testifying thus far. Aknoush's future testimony, and eventually Maroni's, may result in better evidence for the prosecution. End comment. 16. (U) This message has been coordinated with Embassy Berlin. BODDE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04