Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BRASILIA2599 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BRASILIA2599 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Brasilia |
| Created: | 2005-09-29 17:56:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY |
| Tags: | KIPR ETRD IPR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BRASILIA 002599 SIPDIS DEPT FOR EB/IPE SWILSON, AMADAMO AND WHA/BSC DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USTR LYANG AND MSANDLER DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USPTO FOR JURBAN USDOC FOR 3134/USFCS/OIO/WH/EOLSON USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/WH/OLAC/MWARD NSC FOR SCRONIN SENSITIVE E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: KIPR, ETRD, IPR & Biotech SUBJECT: MPA RECOMMENDS TERMINATION OF BRAZIL'S GSP REVIEW, WITH CONDITIONS THIS CABLE IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED - PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY. 1. (SBU) Summary. According to a Business Software Alliance representative, the International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) will likely communicate to USTR on Monday October 3 the action it recommends taking on Brazil's GSP Review. In a written submission to IIPA, the Motion Picture Association (MPA) has recommended that Brazil's GSP review be terminated, conditioned on an understanding that the GoB will accomplish various copyright enforcement measures over the next six months. Topping MPA's wish list is a GoB commitment to perform raids in certain marketplaces twice a month. According to MPA Vice President for Latin American Operations, Steve Solot, a significant clamp down on well-known marketplaces could lessen the importance MPA would place on the other sought after action items. Based on a discussion with Sao Paulo Consul General September 21, representatives of the music, and business software industries appear generally to be on-board with this approach, although the BSA representative later cautioned against assuming IIPA's final position. End Summary. 2. (SBU) During an anti-piracy seminar in Brasilia on September 28, Andre de Almeida of BSA told Econoff that the International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) plans to discuss formulation of its recommendation on Brazil's GSP Review with copyright industry representatives in Brazil via teleconference on September 29. The IIPA review of Brazil's trade benefits under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) dates back to its 2001 petition in which it charged the GoB with ineffective protection of copyrights. The review has been extended three times since June 2004; the current review period ends September 30 (reftel). Almeida added that IIPA plans to send its recommendation to USTR on Monday, October 3. MPA Recommends Termination with Conditions 3. (SBU) On September 22, Steve Solot, Senior Vice President of the Motion Picture Association's (MPA) Latin American Operations, shared with post a copy of MPA's recommendation to the IIPA regarding the GSP Review. MPA has recommended that the Review be terminated, with the understanding the GoB would achieve six enforcement measures within the next six months; otherwise, MPA would urge copyright industries to resume action against Brazil. Solot identified crackdowns in certain well-known pirate marketplaces as the most important action MPA is seeking. The other five measures deal with 1) ensuring Brazilian customs provides pirated products with the same high-priority treatment as counterfeit products; 2) formulation of a strategy for centralizing imports of blank media; 3) dissemination of educational campaign materials; 4) urging inclusion of IPR courses within studies for prosecutors judges, and in police academies; and 5) stimulating creation of anti-piracy councils at state and municipal levels. The substantive text of MPA's submission to IIPA is provided in para 9. 4. (SBU) Solot confirmed for Econoff that MPA understands should the review be terminated, any "resumption" would entail industry filing a new petition. Solot explained that termination seemed the best option for ensuring the current constructive relationship between the private sector and the GOB continues. Nonetheless, he would hope the dialog surrounding a decision to terminate could be used to focus GoB attention on needed action in the marketplaces; significant progress in this area, he noted, would lessen the importance MPA would place on the other action items. While Solot acknowledged the progress the GoB has made in seizing large amounts of pirated products, particularly at the border with Paraguay, he argued that allowing small venders to sell undisturbed in the marketplaces sends a wrong signal to society-at-large. 5. (SBU) In a conversation September 16, the Executive Secretary of the CNCP, Marcio Goncalves, told Econoff that SIPDIS increased action against sale of illicit products in marketplaces was in the works. He explained that the Secretary for National Public Security (SENASP) had recently SIPDIS joined the CNCP and was tasked with mobilizing state and municipal level actions, including raids on local marketplaces; he noted that SENASP does not have direct authority over state and municipal level police forces, but holds substantial sway. On September 19, SENASP announced that it was coordinating state police actions against piracy, beginning with operations in four states; press reports followed about crackdowns in a number of markets. 6. (SBU) Looking at the additional actions being sought by MPA, Solot thought it should not be difficult to get Brazilian customs to issue explicit instructions to agents to give the same treatment for pirated products (copyright) as counterfeit products (trademark) (action 2). He expressed some doubt about the practicality of a strategy to centralize all imports of blank media in a single port (action 3) and admitted that it was not an idea that had been presented previously to the CNCP and that MPA's recommendation included input "from a number of staff." On action item 4, Solot said the ball was actually in the private sector's court - he understood that public sector funds had been set aside to fund an education campaign, but the CNCP was waiting for the private sector to develop the content. The action item (5) that calls for CNCP to urge inclusion of IPR in the studies of prosecutors, judges, and police is already included in the CNCP's 99-point national action plan. MPA's final action item for the GoB is to create state and municipal anti-piracy councils, more or less mirroring the national council. Only Rio and Porto Alegre currently have such councils, although additional states have already moved to establish specialized departments within their police forces to combat piracy. Solot said creation of such councils typically depends heavily on private sector involvement and they would expect to play a large role in development of future councils. Where Do Other Copyright Industries Stand? 7. (SBU) According to Solot, initially copyright industry representatives in film, music and business software had planned to formulate a joint recommendation for IIPA. However, Solot said BSA sent its own recommendation to IIPA the week of September 12, calling for an extension of the review. Nonetheless, in a meeting with Sao Paulo Consul General on September 21, representatives from all three sectors seemed to support the general approach - termination with conditions. All noted that the GoB reaction to another extension would be extremely negative, creating a potentially counterproductive environment. 8. (U) Post will review GoB actions to date to combat piracy and provide input for Washington agencies' consideration septel. Text of MPA's Recommendation 9. (SBU) "The MPA local recommendation is based not only on evaluation of specific enforcement efforts undertaken by the GOB, and specifically the National Anti-Piracy Council (CNCP), since its creation in late 2004, but also on political factors and the important role of MPA's local Anti-Piracy Program Manager as a private- sector member of that Council. The recommendation is also based on the successful enforcement activities undertaken in Brazil, achieved directly or indirectly due to the work of the CNCP, as documented in the monthly reports prepared by Carlos Alberto de Camargo. The MPA local recommendation is a result of evaluation by Carlos Alberto de Camargo, Marcio Goncalves and the undersigned, and has been approved by our MPAA DC office. The local MPA recommendation is an attempt to conciliate political and enforcement factors by recommending termination of the investigation with the understanding that the following 6 items (considered "deliverable") must be achieved within the next six months (by March 30, 2006), or MPA will recommend resumption of the investigation and corresponding possible loss of benefits for Brazilian exports: 1) Maintain continued enforcement actions at least twice a month, based on recommendations from private sector, in each of the well-known pirate markets as follows: - Sao Paulo: Stand Center, 25 de Marco, Galeria Page, Santa Ifigenia, Lapa e Santo Amaro; - Rio de Janeiro: Uruguaiana - Brasilia: Feira do Paraguay - Pernambuco: Feira de Caruaru - Campinas: Camelodromo. 2) Provide specific instructions from the CNCP to customs authorities on the Paraguay border to ensure that commercialization of pirate products receive the same high-priority treatment as contraband of cigarettes, arms and drugs. 3) In conjunction with private-sector representatives, CNCP to design a strategy to centralize all imports of blank media such as CDR and DVDR in a single port of entry, such as Santos. 4) CNCP to ensure that educational campaigns developed in conjunction with the private-sector are disseminated as public service announcements by television networks and other media. 5) CNCP to urge the inclusion of intellectual property rights and piracy as mandatory subjects of study for prosecutors, judges and in police academies. 6) CNCP to stimulate the creation of state and municipal anti-piracy councils in priority capitals and states of Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Bahia, Distrito Federal, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Sul and Parana (Municipalities - Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte, Salvador, Fortaleza, Belem, Campinas, Ribeirao Preto) with a minimum of three such State council and three municipal councils initiated by end- 2005, based on models currently in existence in Rio Grande do Sul." CHICOLA
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04