Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05PARIS6600 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05PARIS6600 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Paris |
| Created: | 2005-09-27 11:07:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR FR |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARIS 006600 SIPDIS DEPT FOR INR/R/MR; IIP/RW; IIP/RNY; BBG/VOA; IIP/WEU; AF/PA; EUR/WE /P/SP; D/C (MCCOO); EUR/PA; INR/P; INR/EUC; PM; OSC ISA FOR ILN; NEA; WHITE HOUSE FOR NSC/WEUROPE; DOC FOR ITA/EUR/FR AND PASS USTR/PA; USINCEUR FOR PAO; NATO/PA; MOSCOW/PA; ROME/PA; USVIENNA FOR USDEL OSCE. E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, FR SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION REPORT - GWOT - Abu Gharaib - Guantanamo PARIS - Tuesday, September 27, 2005 (A) SUBJECTS COVERED IN TODAY'S REPORT: GWOT - Abu Gharaib - Guantanamo B) SUMMARY OF COVERAGE: Domestic political and economic news dominate most front pages, with emphasis on Interior Minister Sarkozy's televised interview last evening announcing his new anti-terrorist measures, and the arrest of a group of Islamic radicals who were allegedly preparing several attacks in Paris. Le Figaro headlines "Islamists Planned Attack on Paris Metro," while France Soir titles: "Sarko Tracks Terrorists." Liberation devotes its editorial to the new anti-terrorist measures and warns against laws that can undermine civil liberties. Gerard Dupuy suggests the legislation should be revised within three years "like the Patriot Act." The liberation of prisoners from Abu Gharaib is reported in Le Figaro while Le Monde devotes its editorial to "American Tortures." (See Part C) Sharon's re-election at the head of the Likud is reported in Liberation, which calls his short victory over Netanyahu a "breath of fresh air for the Prime Minister which saves the party. Obviously, the renewed violence in Gaza did not affect Sharon's position. His quick and firm reaction. probably served to show the voters that when it comes to Israel's security, Sharon does not fool around." (C) SUPPORTING TEXT/BLOCK QUOTES: GWOT - Abu Gharaib - Guantanamo "American Tortures" Left-of-center Le Monde in its unsigned editorial (09/27): "As thousands marched in protest in Washington. the Human Rights Watch published a damning report for the U.S. Army on torture methods and degrading treatment of prisoners implemented in the name of the `war against terror.' This report is important for two reasons: it destroys the myth that the torture methods used in the Abu Gharaib prison were isolated incidents. It also makes testimonials from American soldiers available. The methods revealed are not new. They are used in Iraqi prisons, in Afghanistan and in Guantanamo. They have been proven to be systematic methods used by the U.S. . The American administration has not brought forward a satisfactory response to the fact that its army violates the laws of war. It was successful, in U.S. public opinion, as far as Abu Gharaib is concerned, in demonstrating that the perpetrators were not answering to direct orders. Will America accept this version implicating `lost soldiers.?' The peace movement in the U.S. is not fighting this battle, having chosen instead to save the lives of its boys. By authorizing its Army to use methods which international law qualifies as `severe violations of the laws of war' such as `torture' and `inhuman treatment,' the U.S. is placing itself outside the law and does a disservice to that which it claims to be defending: liberty, justice and democracy. Each time an Iraqi or an Afghan is abused and killed, or tortured, it is a defeat for America and all those who defend the values it pretends to be defending, simply because America is a democracy. But more pragmatically, the use of torture is one less opportunity for Washington to win its wars, because for every prisoner who is abused, for every picture from Abu Gharaib and Guantanamo, there are ten combatants who rise against the U.S." "The Americans Set Free Prisoners from Abu Gharaib" Adrien Jaulmes in right-of-center Le Figaro (09/27): "These liberations could be construed as measures with limited impact by the Iraqis who still think of Abu Gharaib as a symbol of American military brutality. For the Human Rights Watch Abu Gharaib is only the tip of the iceberg of a more generalized system of torture perpetrated elsewhere in Iraq, such as in Faludjah by the 82nd battalion. This attempt to pacify Sunni public opinion is probably coming too late . for the October 15 vote on the Iraqi Constitution. According to another NGO, International Crisis Group, the risk of civil war and of an Iraqi breakdown is to be feared if the Americans do not quickly take into account the demands of the Sunni community." "Secrecy" Gerard Dupuy in left-of-center Liberation (09/27): "The fight against terrorism is both a sacred cause and a secret mission and it is therefore allergic to ordinary explanations. Still the effectiveness of anti-terrorism measures cannot undermine civil liberties. The threat of terrorism is that threat of which everyone is speaking, but there is that other threat on the guardrails protecting democratic values. This is why the legislation drafted (in France) should include a clause requiring the law to be revisited in three years, like the Patriot Act." STAPLETON
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04