Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 02HARARE2368 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 02HARARE2368 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Harare |
| Created: | 2002-10-31 06:03:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PGOV PREL PHUM ZI |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 HARARE 002368 SIPDIS NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR JENDAYI FRAZER LONDON FOR CGURNEY PARIS FOR CNEARY NAIROBI FOR PFLAUMER E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/29/2012 TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PHUM, ZI SUBJECT: MANIPULATION OF FOOD DELIVERIES: UNSC CONSIDERATION? Classified By: political section chief Matt Harrington. Reasons: 1.5 ( B) and (D). 1. (C) Summary: The MDC's Economic Affairs Secretary -- Eddie Cross -- expressed concern about the Government of Zimbabwe's manipulation of food deliveries and pressed for UN Security Council action on this as a major human rights issue. The Ambassador suggested that the food shortage and GOZ's politicization of food assistance might be an appropriate matter for UNSC consideration but thought that linking this to human rights might be a more difficult proposition. Cross told us that a team of South Africans was in town exploring options for resolution of the political crisis, and South Africa's High Commissioner subsequently confirmed this account. End Summary. Manipulation of food -------------------- 2. (C) In an October 25 meeting with the Ambassador, Eddie Cross, Economic Affairs Secretary for the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), expressed serious concern about Zimbabwe's dire food shortage and the Government of Zimbabwe's manipulation of it. He claimed that the GOZ has battened down the commercial supply of food by instituting a national system of roadblocks to inhibit movement of foodstuffs. Food cannot be transported from one place to another, even on a small scale. For instance, a bag of flour being taken by a friend of his to relatives in rural areas was confiscated by police at a roadblock, and these sorts of incidents happen regularly around the country. In addition, during the recent rural council elections and parliamentary by-election in Insiza, the ruling party campaigned with bags of maize, while stating explicitly that those districts that voted for the MDC would not be fed. The Government sells the food it procures at a limited number of distribution centers -- manned by Border Gezi militia members -- and buyers must present a ZANU-PF card and proof of residence. Those unable to produce a ZANU-PF card or who live in a district which voted for the MDC are not permitted to buy food, Cross claimed. Governor Cephas Msipa of Midlands Province does not permit the politicization of aid in his province, but all of his gubernatorial colleagues do, he continued. 3. (C) Cross declared that the denial of food to hungry people because of their political affiliation is a serious abuse of human rights and humanitarian principles. He said MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai was considering pressing the UN Security Council to consider formally the Government's manipulation of food as a serious violation of human rights. Cross suggested that perhaps Kofi Annan could send an investigative team with the mandate to gather evidence and report back to the Security Council. 4. (C) The Ambassador noted that there are numerous confirmed reports of Government-sourced food being used to buttress ZANU-PF's political fortunes. Deliveries of donor food assistance, on the other hand, seem to be working well, for the most part. He said he had attended many food distribution events conducted by WFP's implementing partners, and he was convinced that beneficiaries are identified in a fair, transparent manner. Prior to the WFP suspension of food deliveries in Insiza, the only serious problem with international food assistance occurred in the northwestern town of Binga, where local authorities have blocked deliveries by NGOs they accused of favoring the MDC. The Ambassador said we would investigate any allegations of politicization of donor food assistance, and he encouraged the MDC also to share specific concerns with WFP and the relevant NGO. The Ambassador told Cross that an independent monitoring mechanism was expected to be in place within two weeks. Cross replied that the MDC is in regular contact with the UN's humanitarian coordinator -- and UNDP Resrep -- in Zimbabwe, Victor Angelo. 5. (C) Regarding UN involvement, the Ambassador said he was not sure that another mission to Zimbabwe is the answer. Addressing the food shortage would be an appropriate matter for the UN, including lack of GOZ cooperation with international donors, but tying this to human rights would be a more difficult proposition. Perhaps the UN Security Council could ask UN agencies to report on the food situation and invite outside witnesses, the Ambassador suggested. 6. (C) In a separate conversation with political section chief, MDC MP David Coltart expressed anger at WFP's suspension of food deliveries in Insiza two weeks prior to the October 26-27 parliamentary by-election, after three metric tons were stolen by ZANU-PF supporters and distributed to beneficiaries of their choosing. Coltart said the move ensured that the only food available in the constituency for two weeks was that provided by the ruling party, which distributed food at all its campaign rallies. He said WFP should have, instead, flooded the area with food and been much more public in its criticism of the Government for failing to arrest those responsible. Coltart was worried that failure to resume deliveries in Binga -- which have been stopped since the MDC swept most seats in the recent rural council elections in late September -- while restarting them in Insiza, shortly after ZANU-PF's election victory there, will send the unmistakeable message to rural populations that voting for the ruling party is the only way of acquiring food. (Comment: We asked Coltart if he really would have been happy to have the WFP continue to deliver food in Insiza when it could not assure it would not be seized. Coltart is rightly angry at ZANU-PF's behavior in Insiza, but his criticism of WFP is misplaced since flooding Insiza with food was hardly an option for WFP when its food had been seized. His points about more public WFP criticism of ZANU-PF's food seizure and the importance of resuming food distribution in Binga have more merit. End Comment.) South Africans in Town ---------------------- 7. (C) Eddie Cross expressed concern that political tensions would soon get out of hand and that the MDC would be unable to control them. He said the South African Government (SAG) at that moment had "a team" in town trying to broker a political solution. He said the MDC had rejected the team's proposal that the party withdraw its legal challenge of the presidential election results. Cross claimed that the GOZ had sought the services of an Indian attorney to represent it in this case but that he had refused, saying it was unwinnable. Cross said the MDC believed a prerequisite to any political transition must be Mugabe's retirement. The party, he said, has told the SAG that, once Mugabe withdraws from active politics, it would agree to a transition period, supervised by SADC, that leads to a new election held under international supervision. The Ambassador replied that that approach sounded reasonable, but he cautioned that the ruling party only appears interested in a political solution that guarantees a ZANU-PF government in perpetuity. Comment ------- 8. (C) Cross's comment on a South African team took us by surprise, so we followed up with a couple of key interlocutors to learn more. Gandi Mudzingwa, Tsvangirai's special advisor, confirmed the presence of South African officials, but he said they were intelligence officers from President Mbeki's office here to test the waters for a possible Mbeki visit. They were not selling particular proposals, but were clearly probing for possible solutions to Zimbabwe's political crisis. Mudzingwa claimed they had arranged their own travel here, outside the auspices of the South African High Commission, and did not meet with GOZ representatives. In a conversation with the Ambassador, South Africa's High Commissioner, Jeremiah Ndou, acknowledged the presence of the team. He did not offer details on their identities or home agency -- and we did not press him on this -- but said they were in Harare "to see what's possible." In any case, it appears that the South Africans are considering ramping up their involvement in the search for a lasting resolution of the political crisis here. We cannot confirm whether the low-profile team members were indeed intelligence officers from Mbeki's office, but Ndou's reticence to elaborate on their efforts suggests that they could be. We would welcome Embassy Pretoria's perspective on this interesting development. 9. (C) Cross is right that ZANU-PF has manipulated the food assistance it provides in a variety of ways to buttress its support and punish the residents of areas where the MDC is strong. The delivery of international food assistance is working very smoothly, with the two major exceptions of Binga and Insiza. We believe the question of diverting food from opposition supporters -- when more than half of Zimbabwe's population is facing famine -- is an appropriate issue for discussion by the UN Security Council, but would defer to others on whether linking this matter to human rights is the most effective diplomatic approach. SULLIVAN
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04