Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05BAGHDAD3964 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05BAGHDAD3964 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Baghdad |
| Created: | 2005-09-26 02:34:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | OPRC KMDR KPAO IZ Media Security Parliament |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BAGHDAD 003964 SIPDIS STATE FOR INR/R/MR, NEA/PPD, NEA/PPA, NEA/AGS, INR/IZ, INR/P E.0. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC, KMDR, KPAO, IZ, Media, Security, Parliament SUBJECT: DAILY IRAQI WEBSITE MONITORING - September 25, 2005 SUMMARY: Discussion on the British operation in Basra; Syrian border control; and the constitutional referendum were the major editorial themes of Iraqi, Arabic language websites on September 25, 2005. END SUMMARY. ------------------------------ TABLE OF CONTENTS ------------------------------ A. "Terrorists No One Mentions" (Iraq 4 All News, 9/25) B. "Terrorist Tourism through Damascus" (Sot Al-Iraq, 9/25) C. "Iraq and the Absent Political Consensus" (Independent Iraqi News Agency, 9/25) D. "Two British Soldiers in Basra .A Suspicious Story" (Al- Watan, 9/25) --------------------------------------- SELECTED COMMENTARIES A. "Terrorists No One Mentions" (Editorial by Al-Said Zahra - Iraq 4 All News - http://iraq4all.org/viewnews.php?id=10034 ) "Yesterday I discussed events in Basra and how two British soldiers were caught disguised in local cloths-their vehicle loaded with weapons and explosives. The incident clearly reveals the role of occupation forces in terrorist attacks in Iraq. In another comment about the incident, an American analyst has asked the question: Have the U.S. and Britain established secret terrorist organizations to carry out operations that target innocent Iraqi civilians? "We should note that these operations aim to incite sectarian differences not only in Iraq, but throughout the Middle East, serving U.S. interests by preventing the formation of a unified resistance that would include Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds, and Christians against occupation forces. Sectarian fighting also weakens international opposition to war and occupation. The idea raised by the American author (that occupation forces establish terrorist groups) is nothing new; it has been addressed openly for years, not only in Iraq, but as an American strategy throughout the world. For example, the Moscow Times published in November 2002 reports of Pentagon plans to send secret agents to penetrate terrorist organizations and order SIPDIS assassinations of U.S. targets. The New Yorker magazine last January published an investigation about the formation of terrorist groups and death squads under the supervision of Secretary [of Defense Donald] Rumsfeld. The report goes on SIPDIS to quote a Pentagon advisor: "Local citizens are recruited to join terrorists and carry out terrorist attacks, and these operations commence without the knowledge of U.S. embassies in the targeted states. "It is very likely that the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence services formed terrorist groups and death squads during the last few years, and the question remains: Where are these groups, who are these terrorists, and what operations have they carried out lately? It might be obvious in Iraq, but what about other attacks attributed to Islamic groups? It might be a long time before facts are uncovered, but there is no doubt that Al-Qaeda and other groups are American- made. They are part of a strategy aimed at creating a state of continuous fear of terrorism and creating a list of justifications for occupation campaigns targeting the Arab world." B. "Terrorist Tourism through Damascus" (Editorial by Mohammed Isa - Sot Al-Iraq - http://www.sotaliraq.com/articles-iraq/nieuws .php?id=16080 ) "Talk continues about terrorists crossing from Damascus into Iraq with Syrian indifference to the phenomenon, which I have labeled "terrorist tourism." "It is well known among Arabs, and especially Iraqis, that once you lay foot on the airport in Syria you receive a badgering of questions from policemen and intelligence officers spread throughout the airport-agents with financial and political motivations. In other words, the interrogation process starts at the airport. And it is also known that the tourist season in Syria begins when school lets out and lasts until the end of summer vacation. "In the last two and a half years, and especially following the fall of the former regime, many terrorists have admitted to crossing the Syrian border into Iraq; hundreds or even thousands said they came to Syria by air and arrived at the Damascus airport - and not during tourist season. They should easily draw the authorities' attention: In a country where tourists arriving during the tourist season are subjected to so many inquiries, how could terrorists arriving in large numbers escape suspicion? "The Iraqi Foreign Minister has said that Syrians lack the political will to stop terrorists crossing the border. They need to be seen resisting Zionist and American plots in the region. The reality of the situation is that while all Arab states have established relations with Israel, the hollow Syrian regime insists on playing the leading role in international terrorism. The regime draws Syrians' attention away from their interests claiming the supremacy of the broader national interest as justification. "But the interests of Syrians actually reside in the stability of Iraq, the defeat of terrorism, and the success of the referendum. The Syrian regime should realize the necessity of apprehending Saddam loyalists who sent car bombs to Syria under the previous regime. How could such criminals turn into heroes today, and how could Syrians allow them to continue their actions after being their victims in the past? We ask these questions and await the answers." C. "Iraq and the Absent Political Consensus" (Independent Iraqi News Agency - http://www.normal.iraq- ina.com/showarticles.php?id=1405 ) "The situation in Iraq remains serious with regard to both security and politics. On the security side, many parts of Iraq continue to suffer violence in the form of terror, resistance, criminal violence, and military operations. "It is obvious that security conditions are difficult to control despite the measures that occupation and Iraqi security forces have adopted. And it is clear that security in Iraq is strongly linked to political stability, which also appears to be deteriorating amid significant disagreements over the draft constitution. Deteriorating security conditions coincide with political disagreements and failures to reach balanced solutions. The situation is likely to get worse if political disagreement continues. "The true solution for all of Iraq's crises resides in politics. It begins with Iraqi consensus over the country's future and the occupation forces' announcement of a timetable for troop withdrawals from Iraq. It begins when Iraqis are responsible for their own affairs and are pushed toward the absent consensus." D. "Two British Soldiers in Basra .A Suspicious Story" (Editorial by Abdul Aziz Al Mahmoud - Al-Watan - http://www.al- watan.com/data/20050925/index.asp?content=aze ez ) "The story about the two British soldiers broke on September 19th when an Iraqi police unit established a barrier in the relatively calm city of Basra for fear of possible attacks. The policemen, during a search of vehicles, saw a white car with two suspicious occupants. When the policemen attempted to check them, they started to shoot, killing one officer and wounding the other. Then they fled the scene. Policemen on patrol arrested them, at which point they identified themselves for fear of being killed. Once the officers took them to begin the investigation, tanks broke into the station and destroyed it. "The two officers were working in a special British unit, formerly called SAS. That name later changed to SRR, which is one of the special task units that conducts sabotage operations behind enemy lines. The appearance of the two soldiers, dressed in Arab costumes, and in possession of explosives, makes the situation suspicious. "Iraq is crowded with different intelligence elements. It serves the interests of occupation forces to maintain divisions between Sunnis and Shiites that guarantee the flames of resistance will not spread to predominantly Shiite regions. "One who listened to the British military spokesman can hear the contradictions in British statements: the first revealed his ignorance of the situation; the second stated there were clashes between the British forces and angry citizens; finally it was stated that the Iraqi police handed over the prisoners to an armed militia opposed to the occupation. This piece of news was circulated to media outlets; consequently, many have been misled. "I could not believe this lie, just like so many other lies that invaded our media outlets recently. It is obvious that these two officers were on a secret mission to plant bombs. The evidence is the amount of explosives found in their possession. Fearing disclosure of the whole operation, British commanders ordered troops to break into the station and free the two prisoners without asking permission from commanders in London. The evidence is in the army's contradictory statements. "An official source in the Major Crimes Directorate in Baghdad stated that the two men were working for Mossad and that they confessed during interrogation. Some Arab media outlets coyly published this piece of news in their internal pages. Iraqis should be aware of the conspiracies plotted against them by people whose success depends on continued Sunni-Shiite division." KHALILZAD
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04