Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05ROME3178 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05ROME3178 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Rome |
| Created: | 2005-09-23 10:56:00 |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Tags: | PREL IT NATO |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 003178
SIPDIS
DEPT. FOR EUR/RPM AND EUR/WE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/22/2014
TAGS: PREL, IT, NATO
SUBJECT: ITALY AND NATO ENLARGEMENT: MFA NATO DESK
CONCERNED ABOUT DELAYING MEMBERSHIP PERSPECTIVE FOR
ALBANIA, MACEDONIA AND CROATIA UNTIL 2008
REF: A. STATE 167113
B. ROME 3080
C. ROME 3068
Classified By: Acting Pol M/C Jonathan Cohen for Reasons 1.4 b and d.
1. (C) Summary: Subsequent to the Rome visit of EUR P/DAS
Volker and discussions at NATO on the US two-summit strategy
to advance NATO's strategic direction (reftels), Italy's new
MFA NATO Director Gianni Bardini told PolMil officers on
September 15 that, in his personal opinion, NATO should not
delay offering membership to Macedonia, Albania, and Croatia
until 2008, if they are ready to be invited before then. He
also noted that the last enlargement round was not strictly
tied to a summit date, with the new members joining the
Alliance several months before the Istanbul Summit. (Bio
Note: Bardini's previous assignment was at the Italian
Delegation to NATO.) He stressed that this was a personal
view, as the GOI had not yet had time to develop a national
position. End Summary.
2. (C) Bardini pointed out that he three members of the NATO
Membership Action Plan (MAP), have had their applications "in
the pipeline" for a long time. Using conditions-based
criteria, Macedonia and Croatia, Bardini asserted, have made
good progress in meeting the accession requirements.
Albania, though still a bit behind, is making progress on the
legislative front and, more importantly, has demonstrated
considerable goodwill. The prospect of near-term NATO
membership is important for political reasons, he argued,
because it encourages these countries to continue making the
necessary changes as quickly as possible. He worried that
postponing a decision on membership for an additional two
years would have a negative impact on the pace of reforms.
More generally, he added, it is important to keep the
perspective of joining the Euro-Atlantic community on the
table for these three countries. Croatia will join the EU
soon, and it is a very serious candidate for NATO if progress
is made on the Gotovina issue, because conditions are very
near being met on the defense side. If Gotovina is captured
and turned over, there would be no rationale for postponing
Croatian membership.
3. (C) Bardini further said that it would be unfair to link
NATO accession of the MAP countries to membership for Ukraine
and Georgia, which are "a different basket." These
countries, he said, are at very different, less prepared
levels than the MAP 3 from both a military and political
perspective. He added that the political situation in
Ukraine is "very shaky" and NATO membership for Ukraine is a
very recent idea.
4. (C) Bardini did not appear swayed by the argument that
NATO needed to focus its energy on completing transformation
before taking on new members. Some issues, he said, such as
the ISAF/OEF merger in Afghanistan, will be resolved in the
short-term. Political decisions on other issues will take
more time, he added, but NATO needs to deal with all the
major issues, including enlargement, concurrently. Bardini
assumed the U.S. would carry the day on summit dates and the
sequence of transformation and enlargement, but urged us to
think about keeping the membership perspective for the MAP
countries attractive, truly conditions-based, and de-linked
from shortcomings in Georgia and Ukraine.
5. (C) Comment: While Bardini's views are, as he took pains
to point out, not Italian policy, as the MFA NATO Office
Director and a veteran of the Italian NATO delegation, his
opinions will carry considerable weight and merit our
attention. Post would welcome points we can use with him and
other Italian officials to demonstrate how we will keep the
2008 date from slowing progress on reforms and from souring
MAP opinion (both public and official) on NATO membership.
End Comment.
SPOGLI
NNNN
2005ROME03178 - Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04