Disclaimer: This site has been first put up 15 years ago. Since then I would probably do a couple things differently, but because I've noticed this site had been linked from news outlets, PhD theses and peer rewieved papers and because I really hate the concept of "digital dark age" I've decided to put it back up. There's no chance it can produce any harm now.
| Identifier: | 05WARSAW3447 |
|---|---|
| Wikileaks: | View 05WARSAW3447 at Wikileaks.org |
| Origin: | Embassy Warsaw |
| Created: | 2005-09-23 09:45:00 |
| Classification: | UNCLASSIFIED |
| Tags: | PHUM PREL PL OSCE |
| Redacted: | This cable was not redacted by Wikileaks. |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 WARSAW 003447 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PHUM, PREL, PL, OSCE SUBJECT: OSCE: HDIM OPENING FOCUSES ON OSCE REFORM 1. Summary: The opening session of the 2005 Human Dimension Implementation Meeting gave participants a chance to set out their views of the OSCE, against the backdrop of reform discussions ongoing in Vienna. Poland, the U.S., and Kyrgyzstan voiced strong support for OSCE's human rights work and for the need to hold States accountable for implementing their OSCE commitments. Others, including Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and to an extent CiO Slovenia, advocated "updating" OSCE standards and ensuring they are unbiased and applied equally to all countries. Kazakhstan made a clear push for their 2009 Chairmanship bid, but in doing so also exposed the approach towards the human dimension they likely would take as CiO: putting economic reforms first. The new OSCE Secretary General added to the reform debate by proposing that the OSCE once again take up the issue of culture as a confidence building measure to promote tolerance. End summary. Support for the OSCE -------------------- 2. Polish Undersecretary of State Piotr Switalski gave one of the strongest statements in support of the OSCE that we have heard in years. He said OSCE has become a "proxy target" for some participating States which are really questioning the basic standards and values that the OSCE represents. Those who fear democracy believe that those who advocate it are plotting to destabilize other countries and gain influence. The mistrust is unfounded but it is damaging the OSCE. Restructuring the OSCE or giving it a legal personality will not fix the current situation; rather, substantive issues must be addressed. There should be no "value gap," since it is not true that there are differences in democratic values among OSCE States. However, the OSCE needs to support those States that need assistance and to deal with a growing "civilization gap" as new minorities migrate into Europe. Above all, OSCE States should be willing to face the hard questions and issues: "Why is it that we sometimes refrain from raising instances of non-compliance with OSCE commitments? Why do we allow the Moscow Mechanism to be perceived as offensive? Why do States sometimes hide behind NGOs, allowing them to raise the difficult issues?" He also raised bilateral issues with Belarus, expressing Polish concerns with the treatment of the Union of Poles in Belarus. 3. U.S. Ambassador Finley gave a strong statement in support of the OSCE and in particular of its election activities. OSCE election standards and the independence of its election observations must be supported. She raised specific concerns about the human rights situation in Belarus, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Russia, and Chechnya. Belarusian OSCE CoE Director Denis Sidorenko took issue with the U.S. statement. He said that while "new democracies" have made great progress over the past few years, the "established democracies" like the U.S. have had new problems with elections, intolerance and anti- Semitism, and restrictions on media freedoms. Sidorenko therefore rejected Finley's and Switalsky's criticisms, and stressed that OSCE should focus on concrete assistance projects. 4. As if in response to the Belarusian statement, Kyrgyz Vice Ombudsman Mamaturaim Momunov gave his explicit support for Ambassador Finley's intervention and for using the HDIM to raising specific human rights concerns with individual countries. He thanked the OSCE for its assistance programs in Central Asia, adding that anti-democratic developments in neighboring countries present obstacles to reform within Kyrgyzstan. For example, Kyrgyzstan is worried about the use of torture and the prison conditions in other Central Asian States. Also, while Bishkek did everything it could to protect Uzbek refugees who fled to Kyrgyzstan after the events in Andijon, the Kyrgyz government came under significant pressure from its neighbor to return the refugees to Uzbekistan. Momounov proposed that Bishkek host a conference in December on the protection of human rights, focusing on the countries that have had regime change recently, including Ukraine and Georgia, to discuss the difficulties they face from the problems previous regimes left behind. (Note: In a later session on migration and refugees, a Kazakh representative expressed disappointment over the Kyrgyz opening statement and said she would report its contents to Kazakh authorities.) Other Opening Statements ------------------------ 5. The Russian opening statement focused on terrorism, saying it threatens democracy but that some countries use "combatting terrorism" as an excuse to violate human rights due process. Russian speaker Lebedev also said OSCE standards should be updated since today's security situation is complicated and solutions like the Orange Revolution are not effective. Azerbaijan (speaking on behalf of the GUAM) said OSCE priorities should include work on combating trafficking in persons, forced displacement, and ethnic cleansing and aggressive nationalism. Georgia added that the HDIM should be held outside of Warsaw every other year and reiterated its willingness to host it. 6. Kazakhstan's First Deputy Foreign Minister Rakhat Aliyev made a statement clearly aimed at securing his country's bid for the 2009 Chairmanship of the OSCE, but which signaled several Kazakh priorities that we would oppose. (Note: The 2009 Chairmanship decision must be made in 2006.) He stressed that States must not use the fight against terrorism as a pretext to crack down on opposition. However, he also said the OSCE should look more carefully at reform processes, since economic reform and political liberalization are separate. He said that when civil society develops too quickly in the absence of economic reform, then social destabilization results. Thus Kazakhstan supports step- by-step reforms, where economic reforms come first and define the political system. Aliyev sees "double- standards" when media and NGOs fail "to uphold OSCE standards." [Comment: While OSCE documents contain commitments for participating States, they stipulate that NGOs and the media should be free and independent. Aliyev's comment was a veiled suggestion that media and civil society should avoid stirring up instability by criticizing government leaders and policies.] Aliyev repeated Kazakhstan's offer to hold a conference on inter-religious and inter-ethnic dialogue next year. Finally, he pointed to President Nazarbayev's recent address presenting a package of political reforms, including provisions to ensure free and fair elections in December and the creation of a State Commission on democratic reforms. OSCE Reform Issues ------------------ 7. The Slovenian Chairmanship's representative, Boris Frlec, reiterated the OSCE principle that human rights are not solely an internal affair. This principle allows participating States to use peer pressure to hold each other accountable for the implementation of their OSCE commitments. He supported the recommendations in the report of the Panel of Eminent Persons to create a human dimension committee and to ensure that OSCE election observation standards are unbiased and more standardized. 8. OSCE Secretary General Marc Perrin de Brichambaut focused on how the OSCE could increase its cooperation with other international organizations, noting it could work with the newly created UN Peacebuilding Commission. He also proposed that the OSCE - perhaps working with UNESCO - consider resurrecting its focus on culture as a confidence building measure, particularly to build tolerance and combat discrimination. OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities Rolf Ekeus stressed the need for minorities' education and language use, participation in political and administrative bodies, including police, citizenship, cultural expression, and repatriation and property restitution issues. ASHE
Latest source of this page is cablebrowser-2, released 2011-10-04